Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 10:2 (2020) ► pp.228249
Acock, A. C.
(2014) A Gentle Introduction to Stata (4th ed.). Texas: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Balogh, J., Zurif, E., Prather, P., Swinney, D., & Finkel, L.
(1998) Gap-filling and end-of-sentence effects in real-time language processing: Implications for modeling sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 61(2), 169–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A.
(1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 511, 1173–1182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., Singmann, H., et al.
(2015) Package‘lme4’. Available at: [URL]
Belfi, A. M., Vessel, E. A., & Starr, G. G.
(2018) Individual ratings of vividness predict aesthetic appeal in poetry. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(3), 341–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belyk, M., & Brown, S.
(2013) Perception of affective and linguistic prosody: an ALE meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(9), 1395–1403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clifton, C., Carlson, K., & Frazier, L.
(2006) Tracking the what and why of speakers’ choices: Prosodic boundaries and the length of constituents. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 854–861. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J.
(1996) Inferring character from texts: Attribution theory and foregrounding theory. Poetics, 23(5), 335–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & Van Donselaar, W.
(1997) Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and speech, 40(2), 141–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, P.
(2008) Syntax and pathways. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 33(4), 265–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frota, S.
(2014) The intonational phonology of European Portuguese. Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 6–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujisaki, H.
(1997) Prosody, models, and spontaneous speech. In Y. Sagisaka, N. Campbell, & N. Higuchi (Eds.) Computing prosody (pp. 27–42). New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, J. F.
(2004) Foregrounding and its effect on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 193–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D.
(1996) Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgements. Poetics, 23(5), 363–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) The genre-specific hypothesis of reading: Reading poetry and encyclopedic items. Poetics, 26(2), 63–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P., & Ladd, D. R.
(2008) Prosodic description: An introduction for fieldworkers. Language Documentation & Conservation, 2(2), 244–274.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M.
(2015) Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 91, 186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., Lüdtke, J., Aryani, A., Meyer-Sickendieck, B., & Conrad, M.
(2016) Mood-empathic and aesthetic responses in poetry reception. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1), 87–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keidel, J. L., Davis, P. M., Gonzalez-Diaz, V., Martin, C. D., & Thierry, G.
(2013) How Shakespeare tempests the brain: Neuroimaging insights. Cortex, 49(4), 913–919. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knoop, C. A., Wagner, V., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W.
(2016) Mapping the aesthetic space of literature “from below”. Poetics, 561, 35–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kraxenberger, M., & Menninghaus, W.
(2016b) Mimological reveries? Disconfirming the hypothesis of phono-emotional iconicity in poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 1779. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Affinity for poetry and aesthetic appreciation of joyful and sad poems. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 2051. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kraxenberger, M., Menninghaus, W., Roth, A., & Scharinger, M.
(2018) Prosody-based sound-emotion associations in poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 91, 1284–1284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D.
(2004) A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. N.
(1985) Stylistics. In T. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse and literature: New approaches to the analysis of literary genres (pp 39–57). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ludlow, L., & Klein, K.
(2014) Suppressor variables: the difference between ‘is’ versus ‘acting as’. Journal of Statistics Education, 22(2), null. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S.
(2007) Mediation Analysis. Annual review of psychology, 581, 593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M.
(2000) Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect. Prevention science: the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 1(4), 173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Männel, C., Schipke, C. S., & Friederici, A. D.
(2013) The role of pause as a prosodic boundary marker: Language ERP studies in German 3-and 6-year-olds. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 51, 86–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obermeier, C., Kotz, S. A., Jessen, S., Raettig, T., von Koppenfels, M., & Menninghaus, W.
(2016) Aesthetic appreciation of poetry correlates with ease of processing in event-related potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(2), 362–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pandey, S., & Elliott, W.
(2010) Suppressor Variables in Social Work Research: Ways to Identify in Multiple Regression Models. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1(1), 28–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, B. R., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L.
(2014) Adult age differences in wrap-up during sentence comprehension: Evidence from ex-Gaussian distributional analyses of reading time. Psychology and Aging, 29(2), 213–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pessoa, F.
(1934) Mensagem (Prólogo e anotações de Pedro Sinde). Porto: Porto Editora.Google Scholar
de Pijper, J. R., & Sanderman, A. A.
(1994) On the perceptual strength of prosodic boundaries and its relation to suprasegmental cues. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(4), 2037–2047. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R core team
(2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P.
(2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E.
(2011) Mediation analysis in social psychology: current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva, S., Dias, C., & Castro, S. L.
(2019) Domain-specific expectations in music segmentation. Brain Sciences, 9(7), 169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siomopoulos, G.
(1977) Poetry as affective communication. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 46(3), 499–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N.
(1999) Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(1), 137–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D.
(1999) Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2(2), 191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stowe, L. A., Kaan, E., Sabourin, L., & Taylor, R. C.
(2018) The sentence wrap-up dogma. Cognition, 1761, 232–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terken, J., & Hermes, D.
(2000) The Perception of prosodic prominence. In M. Horne (Ed.), Prosody: Theory and Experiment (141, pp. 89–129).Google Scholar
Thierry, G., Martin, C. D., Gonzalez-Diaz, V., Rezaie, R., Roberts, N., & Davis, P. M.
(2008) Event-related potential characterization of the Shakespearean functional shift in narrative sentence structure. NeuroImage, 40(2), 923–931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tursunov, A., Kwon, S., & Pang, H. S.
(2019) Discriminating emotions in the valence dimension from speech using timbre features. Applied Sciences, 9(12), 2470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullrich, S., Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M.
(2017) On the relation between the general affective meaning and the basic sublexical, lexical, and inter-lexical features of poetic texts – a case study using 57 poems of H. M. Enzensberger. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 2073. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Heuven, V. J. J. P.
(1994) Introducing prosodic phonetics. In: C. Odé, & V. J. J. P. van Heuven (Eds.), Phonetic studies of Indonesian prosody (pp. 1–26). Leiden: Faculteit der Letteren.Google Scholar
Wassiliwizky, E., Koelsch, S., Wagner, V., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W.
(2017) The emotional power of poetry: Neural circuitry, psychophysiology and compositional principles. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(8), 1229–1240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, X., Shen, X., Li, W., & Yang, Y.
(2014) How listeners weight acoustic cues to intonational phrase boundaries. PloS One, 9(7), e102166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar