Cover not available
Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 12:1/2 (2022) ► pp.49–82

Style of creative nonfiction

A multidimensional analysis of literary essays

ORCID logo | Northern Arizona University
The study examines author style within underlying patterns of variation in nonfiction essays. The study employs corpus linguistic methodology, building on research on style in fiction (Biber & Finegan, 1994; Biber, 2008b; Egbert, 2012), applies a multidimensional analysis to a corpus of nonfiction essays written by modern authors, a previously unexplored domain, and identifies four unique but interrelated dimensions of variation based on linguistic co-occurrence: Interactive vs. Informational Style, Abstract Expository vs. Concrete Descriptive Style, Immediate vs. Removed Style, and Hypothetical Style. Authors’ works are then plotted along these dimensions, revealing stylistic tendencies with relation to the observed patterns of variation. The study also observes that considerable within-author variation along a given dimension results from differences in situational characteristics of individual texts rather than simply idiosyncratic preferences for certain language. The study contributes to the field of corpus stylistics and has practical implications for creative writing, literary analysis, and translation.
Keywords: style variation, corpus stylistics, nonfiction essays, multidimensional analysis
Article outline
  • Methodology
    • Corpus
    • Linguistic features
    • Factor analysis
  • Results and discussion
    • Dimensions of variation in creative nonfiction essays
      • Dimension 1. Interactive vs. Informational Style
      • Dimension 2. Abstract Expository vs. Concrete Descriptive Style
      • Dimension 3. Immediate vs. Removed Style
      • Dimension 4. Hypothetical Style
    • Author differences along the dimensions
      • Authors along Dimension 1: Interactive vs. Informational Style
      • Authors along Dimension 2: Abstract Expository vs. Concrete Descriptive Style
      • Authors along Dimension 3: Immediate vs. Removed Style
  • Conclusion
    • Limitations and future directions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 29 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.22002.gra
References (54)
References
Asimov, I. (1980). On Style, Introduction to Who Done It? (I. Asimov & A. Laurance, Eds.). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008b). Using corpus-based analysis to study fictional style: a multidimensional analysis of variation among and within novels. Invited plenary lecture. International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature. University of Memphis.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1994). Multi-dimensional analyses of authors’ styles: some case studies from the eighteenth century. Research in Humanities Computing, 31, 3–17.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English (LGSWE). Longman.Google Scholar
Borich, B. J. (2013). What is creative nonfiction? An introduction. Barrie Jean Borich. [URL]
Brown, J. D. (2009). Choosing the right type of rotation in PCA and EFA. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13 (3), 20–25.Google Scholar
Burrows, J. (1987). Computation into Criticism: A Study of Jane Austen’s Novels. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity. The art of common talk. Routledge.Google Scholar
(2007). Response to special issue of Applied Linguistics devoted to language creativity in everyday contexts. Applied Linguistics, 28 (4), 597–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, I., & Grieve, J. (2019). Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account: A linguistic analysis of tweets posted between 2009 and 2018. PLoS ONE 14(9): e0222062. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connor-Linton, J. (2014). Author’s style and world view: A comparison about American nuclear arms policy. In D. Biber & S. Conrad (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional studies (pp. 84–93). Routledge.Google Scholar
Cowart, D. & Wymer, T. L. (1981). Dictionary of Literary Biography. Gale Research.Google Scholar
Dubrow, H. (2006). The interplay of narrative and lyric: Competition, cooperation, and the case of the anticipatory amalgam. Narrative, 4(3), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J. (2012). Style in nineteenth century fiction. A multidimensional analysis. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(2), 167–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glatch, S. (2020, September 8). Creative nonfiction: What it is and how to write it. [URL]. [URL]
Glennon, L. (2016). Phillip Lopate celebrates the personal essay. Columbia Magazine. [URL]
Goetzman, A. (2015, May 29). ‘Secret shapes’ form backbone of essays in ‘The World Is on Fire’. Minn Post. [URL]
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. (1982). Isaac Asimov: The Foundations of Science Fiction. Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Gutkind, L. (2007). The Best Creative Nonfiction. W.W.Norton.Google Scholar
Haider, T. (2021). Metrical tagging in the wild: Building and annotating poetry corpora with rhythmic features. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics. [URL]. DOI logo
Hardy, D. E., & Durian, D. (2000). The stylistics of syntactic complements: Grammar and seeing in Flannery O’Connor’s fiction. Style, 34 1, 92–116.Google Scholar
Hartsock, J. (2016). Literary Journalism and the Aesthetics of Experience. University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, J., Jacobs, A., & Piper, A. (2021). Computational Stylistics. In: D. Kuiken, & A. Jacobs (Eds.). Handbook of Empirical Literary Studies, (pp.451–486). De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higgleton, E. (2003). Chambers Pocket Dictionary. (G. Davidson, E. Higgleton, H. Sargeant, A. Seaton, Eds.). Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Hoover, D. (2007). Corpus stylistics, stylometry, and the styles of Henry James. Style, 41 ( 2 ), 174–203.Google Scholar
Huang, Y., & Ren, W. (2020). A novel multidimensional analysis of writing styles of editorials from China Daily and The New York Times. Lingua, 2351, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. (2018). (Neuro-)cognitive poetics and computational stylistics. Scientific Study of Literature, 8 (1), 165–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A., & Kinder, A. (2022). Computational analyses of the topics, sentiments, literariness, creativity and beauty of texts in a large Corpus of English Literature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A., & Willems, R. (2017). The fictive brain: Neurocognitive correlates of engagement in literature. Review of General Psychology, 22 (2), 147–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39 1, 31–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knoop, C., Wagner, V., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W. (2016). Mapping the aesthetic space of literature “from below”. Poetics, 56 1, 35–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langer, S. K. (1953). Feeling and Form. Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N., & Short, M. H. (2007). Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M. (2013). Corpus Stylistics and Dickens’s Fiction. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M., & McIntyre, D. (2011). A case for corpus stylistics. Ian Fleming’s Casino Royale . English Text Construction, 4 ( 2 ), 204–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Kuehnast, M., & Jacobsen, T. (2015). Towards a psychological construct of being moved. PLoS ONE, 10 (6). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2017). The Distancing–embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40 1, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, M. (2019, December 19). Remembering Michael Steinberg (1940–2019). Talking Writing. [URL]
Olusova, L. M. (2015). Stylistic features and ideological elements in Chimamanda Adichie’s Purple Hibiscus and Chinua Achebe’s Anthills of the Savannah . International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 3 ( 4 ), 1–8.Google Scholar
Root, R. (2008). The Nonfictionist’s Guide: On Reading and Writing Creative Nonfiction. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Salgaro, M., Wagner, V., & Menninghaus, W. (2021). A good, a bad, and an evil character: Who renders a novel most enjoyable? Poetics, 87 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scholastica, W. N. (2014). A stylistic approach to Chimamanda Adichie’s work: A case study of Americanah . (Publication No 11295/77137) [Master’s Thesis, University of Nairobi]. UoN Digital Repository Home.
Seguin, R. (2020). Form, Voice, and Utopia in David Foster Wallace. Criticism, 62 ( 2 ), 219–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shindler, I., Hosoya, G., Menninghaus, W., Beermann, U., Wagner, V., Eid, M., Scherer, K. R. (2017). Measuring aesthetic emotions: A review of the literature and a new assessment tool. PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0178899. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalan, C. (1989). The pragmastylistics of hypothetical discourse. In L. Hickey (Ed.), The Pragmatics of Style (pp.87–105). Routledge.Google Scholar
Silverman, S. W. (2008, September). The meandering river: An overview of the subgenres of creative nonfiction. Association of Writers and Writing Programs. [URL]
Singer, M. & Walker, N. (Eds.). (2013). Bending Genre. Essays on Creative Nonfiction. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (2005). Conrad in the computer: examples of quantitative stylistic methods. Language and Literature. 14 ( 1 ), 5–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1927). Symbolism: Its Meaning and Effect. Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

N. Labi, Adamson
2024. Learning Appreciation By Innovation (L.A.B.I.) Model: BANKING ON THE ATMs OF SPEECH WRITING. Strategic Financial Reviews 1:1 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.