What’s your problem? And how might we deepen it?
Literary studies need not always incorporate evolution but should always be at least compatible with the most powerful theory for explaining life. Evolution can open up new questions (like: why are we art-making, storytelling, versifying animals?), suggest new principles (like: always take into consideration the costs and benefits of creating or engaging in literary works), and offer new explanations of the life art represents and the effects it elicits (in sociality or emotion, say). These insights need not be restricted to human universals – evolutionary anthropology and evolutionary personality psychology investigate societal and individual differences – and can help explain at multiple levels, the global, the local, the individual, the work or the detail. Evolutionary considerations should not be required a priori but incorporated on a case-by-case basis, where they can almost always add explanatory depth.
Keywords: literature, literary Darwinism, evolution, evocriticism, attention, cost-benefit model, problem-solution model, cognition, empirical study of literature, habituation, pattern
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Jonsson, Emelie
2021.
Darwinism in Literature. In
The Early Evolutionary Imagination,
► pp. 69 ff.

Carroll, Joseph
2015.
Evolutionary Literary Study. In
The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology,
► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.