Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 4:1 (2014) ► pp.324
References
Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J.C.J
(2012) Getting Real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the Functional Role of the P600 in Language Comprehension. Brain Research, 14461, 127–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engelberts, L
(2008) Echte slechte mensen. Amsterdam: De Harmonie.Google Scholar
Fisher, M.H., Carminati, M.N., Stabler, J., & Roberts, A
(2003) Eye movements during poetry and prose reading. 13th European Conference on Eye Movements (Dundee, Scotland; 20-24 August).
Golomb, H
(1979) Enjambment in poetry: Language and verse in interaction. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institue for Poetics and Semiotics.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D
(1996). Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgments. Poetics, 231, 363–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Reading poetry: An empirical investigation of Formalist, Stylistic and Conventionalist claims. Poetics Today, 191, 565–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) What we know about reading poetry. Theoretical positions and empirical research. In D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 107–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartman, C.O
(1980) Free verse. An essay on prosody. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hoeks, J.C.J., & Brouwer, H
(2014) Electrophysiological Research on Conversation and Discourse Processing. In: Holtgraves, T. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. 365–386.Google Scholar
Hoeks, J.C.J., Hendriks, P., Vonk, W., Brown, C.M., & Hagoort, P
(2006) Processing the NP- versus S-coordination ambiguity. Thematic information does not completely eliminate processing difficulty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59 (9), 1581–1599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffstaedter, P
(1987) Poetic Text Processing and its empirical investigation. Poetics, 161, 75–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A
(1980) A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 871, 329–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Komrij, G
(2010) De 21ste eeuw in 185 gedichten. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.Google Scholar
Koops van ’t Jagt, R
(2011) Een lege plek om te blijven. Een eyetrackingonderzoek naar de online verwerking van regelverdeling en enjambement in poëzie [An empty place to stay. An eye tracking investigation into the on-line processing of lineation and enjambment in poetry]. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Groningen.
Peer, W. van
(1986) Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Rayner, K
(1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124 (3), 372–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reuven, T
(1998) Poetic rhythm: structure and performance; an empirical study in cognitive poetics. Berne: Lang.Google Scholar
Steinhauer, K. & Friederici, A.D
(2001) Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: the closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30 (3), 267–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R.A
(1991) Some parameters of literary and news comprehension. Poetics, 201, 139–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 201, 930–933. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Blohm, Stefan, Stefano Versace, Sanja Methner, Valentin Wagner, Matthias Schlesewsky & Winfried Menninghaus
2022. Reading Poetry and Prose: Eye Movements and Acoustic Evidence. Discourse Processes 59:3  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Bruhn, Mark J.
2018. Citation analysis. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Carrol, Gareth, Kathy Conklin, Josephine Guy & Rebekah Scott
2015. Processing punctuation and word changes in different editions of prose fiction. Scientific Study of Literature 5:2  pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
Castiglione, Davide
2017. Difficult poetry processing: Reading times and the narrativity hypothesis. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:2  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Castiglione, Davide
2019. Processing Baseline: The Easy Poem. In Difficulty in Poetry,  pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Castiglione, Davide
2019. Transient Difficulty: Utterances Towards Obscurity. In Difficulty in Poetry,  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Hilberink-Schulpen, Béryl, Ulrike Nederstigt, Frank van Meurs & Emmie van Alem
2016. Does the use of a foreign language influence attention and genre-specific viewing patterns for job advertisements? An eye-tracking study. Information Processing & Management 52:6  pp. 1018 ff. DOI logo
Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota, Anna Czypionka, Wojciech Witkowski & Joanna Błaszczak
2018. The time course of processing perfective and imperfective aspect in Polish. Acta Linguistica Academica 65:2-3  pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Montoro, Rocío
2015. The Year’s Work in stylistics 2014. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 24:4  pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Nishihara, Takayuki
2016. Chapter 8. Of learning and poetics. In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 24],  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.