Cover not available
Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp.150–177

Lost in an iPad

Narrative engagement on paper and tablet

| Department of Archivistics, Library and Information Studies, Oslo & Akershus University College, Norway / 2The Reading Centre, University of Stavanger, Norway
| Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Canada
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of reading medium and a paratext manipulation on aspects of narrative engagement. In a 2 (medium: booklet vs. iPad) by 2 (paratext: fiction vs. nonfiction) between-subjects factorial design, the study combined state oriented measures of narrative engagement and a newly developed measure of interface interference. Results indicated that, independently of prior experience with reading on electronic media, readers in the iPad condition reported dislocation within the text and awkwardness in handling their medium. Also, iPad readers who believed they were reading nonfiction were less likely to report narrative coherence and transportation, while booklet readers who believed they were reading nonfiction were, if anything, more likely to report narrative coherence. Finally, booklet (but not iPad) readers were more likely to report a close association between transportation and empathy. Implications of these findings for cognitive and emotional engagement with textual narratives on paper and tablet are discussed.
Keywords: media effects, new media, emotion, paratext, reading, narrative
Published online: 30 March 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man
References (88)
Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(1), 18–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altmann, U., Bohrn, I.C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A.M. (2012). Fact versus fiction: How paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience (Advance Access published September 29, 2012). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Appel, M., & Malečkar, B. (2012). The influence of paratext on narrative persuasion: Fact, fiction, or fake? Human Communication Research, 38(4), 459–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baccino, T. (2004). La lecture electronique. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Baccino, T., & Pynte, J. (1994). Spatial coding and discourse models during text reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 91, 143–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bal, P.M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PloS one, 8(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedetto, S., Drai-Zerbib, V., Pedrotti, M., Tissier, G., & Baccino, T. (2013). E-readers and visual fatigue. PloS one, 8(12), e83676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 261, 321–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradford, J.W. (2012). A case study examining the reading and study habits of gifted readers in the context of deep reading. Doctoral thesis, Kennesaw State University, GA, USA. Retrieved from [URL]
Braun, I.K., & Cupchik, G. (2001). Phenomenological and quantitative analyses of absorption in literary passages. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19(1), 85–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cataldo, M.G., & Oakhill, J. (2000). Why are poor comprehenders inefficient searchers? An investigation into the effects of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 791–799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cipielewski, J., & Stanovich, K.E. (1992). Predicting growth in reading ability from children’s exposure to print. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54(1), 74–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derntl, B., Finkelmeyer, A., Eickhoff, S., Kellermann, T., Falkenberg, D.I., Schneider, F., & Habel, U. (2010). Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities: Neural correlates and gender differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(1), 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., Zoeterman, S., & Peterson, J.B. (2009). On being moved by art: How reading fiction transforms the self. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 24–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyson, M.C., & Haselgrove, M. (2000). The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eklundh, K.S. (1992). Problems in achieving a global perspective of the text in computer-based writing. Instructional Science, 21(1), 73–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eveland, W.P., Jr., & Dunwoody, S. (2002). An investigation of elaboration and selective scanning as mediators of learning from the Web versus print. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 34–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feagin, S.L. (1996). Reading with feeling: The aesthetics of appreciation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Gerlach, J., & Buxmann, P. (2011). Investigating the acceptance of electronic books: The impact of haptic dissonance on innovation adoption. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).Google Scholar
Gerrig, R.J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M.C. Green, J.J. Strange, & T.C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315–341). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, J.F. (2004). Foregrounding and its effect on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 193–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helsper, E.J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, N.N. (2009). Literature and the brain. Cambridge, Mass.: PsyArt Foundation.Google Scholar
Jeong, H. (2012). A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, 301, 390–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D.R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamil, M.L., Pearson, P.D., Moje, E.B. & Afflerbach, P.P. (Eds.) (2011). Handbook of Reading Research. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D.C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. & Kim, J. (2013). Reading from an LCD monitor versus paper: Teenagers’ reading performance. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology (IJRSET), 21, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, F., Pleimling, D., Hosemann, J., Füssel, S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2013). Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PloS one, 8(2), e56178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Campbell, P., & Sopčák, P. (2012). The experiencing questionnaire: Locating exceptional reading moments. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(2), 243–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., & Oliver, M.B. (2013). Aesthetic engagement during moments of suffering. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(2), 294–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Digital reading: An overview. Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science Vol. 5(1).Google Scholar
Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford review of education, 38(1), 9–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Digital learning and participation among youth: Critical reflections on future research priorities. International Journal of Learning, 2(2–3), 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A. (2006). New narrative pleasures? A cognitive-phenomenological study of the experience of reading digital narrative fictions. Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology [NTNU], Trondheim, Norway. Retrieved from [URL]
. (2008). Hypertext fiction reading: Haptics and immersion. Journal of research in reading, 31(4), 404–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., Robinet, P., Olivier, G., & Velay, J.-L. (in prep.). Where in the book and when in the story? Comparing comprehension when reading a mystery story in print and on Kindle.
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B.R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper vs. computer screens: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 581, 61–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manguel, A. (1996). A history of reading. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Mar, R.A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J.B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J.B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 341, 407–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margolin, S.J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M.J., & Kegler, J.L. (2013). E‐readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 271, 512–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, R.A., & Just, M.A. (2009). The role of the Theory-of-Mind cortical network in the comprehension of narratives. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 157–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D.S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Beyond text theory: Understanding literary response. Discourse Processes, 17(3), 337–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28(2), 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mol, S.E., & Bus, A.G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuland, S.B. (1994). How we die: Reflections of life’s final chapter. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
O’Regan, J.K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 939–973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K. (2011a). Fiction and its study as gateways to the mind. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(1), 153–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011b). Such stuff as dreams. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K., Mar, R.A., & Djikic, M. (2012). The Psychology of fiction: Present and future. In I. Jaén & J.J. Simon (Eds.), Cognitive literary studies: Current themes and new directions. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Paris, S.G., Wasik, B.A., & Turner, J.C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research Vol. II (pp. 609–640). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Pattuelli, M.C., & Rabina, D. (2010). Forms, effects, function: LIS students’ attitudes towards portable e-book readers. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 62(3), 228–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piolat, A., Roussey, J.-Y., & Thunin, O. (1997). Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(4), 565–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 91, 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reniers, R.L.E.P., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N.M., & Völlm, B.A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, E. 2011. The phenomenology of on-screen reading: University students’ lived experience of digitised text. British Journal of Educational Technology, 421, 515–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothkopf, E. (1971). Incidental memory for location of information in text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 101, 608–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarry, E. (2001). Dreaming by the book. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sellen, A.J., & Harper, R.H. (2003). The myth of the paperless office. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P., Bergamin, P. & Groner, R. (2011). Comparing reading processes on e-ink displays and print. Displays, 32(5), 268–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegenthaler, E., Schmid, L., Wyss, M., & Wurtz, P. (2012). LCD vs. e-ink: An analysis of the reading behaviour. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(5), 1–7.Google Scholar
Spunt, R.P., & Lieberman, M.D. (2011). An integrative model of the neural systems supporting the comprehension of observed emotional behavior. Neuroimage, 591, 3050–3059. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K.E. (1993). Does reading make you smarter? Literacy and the development of verbal intelligence. In W.R. Hayne (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 241) (pp. 133–180): JAI. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., & Barzillai, M. (2009). The importance of deep reading. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 32–37.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., Ullman-Shade, C., & Gottwald, S. (2012). The emerging, evolving reading brain in a digital culture: Implications for new readers, children with reading difficulties, and children without schools. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11(3), 230–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wästlund, E. (2007). Experimental studies of human-computer interaction: Working memory and mental workload in complex cognition. Doctoral thesis, Department of Psychology, Gothenburg University, Sweden. Retrieved from [URL]
Wästlund, E, Reinikka, H, Norlander, T, & Archer, T (2005). Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 211, 377–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zechmeister, E.B., & McKillip, J. (1972). Recall of place on the page. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(5), 446–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, D. (1991). Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 135–167.Google Scholar
Zunshine, L. (2006). Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R.A. (1993). Aspects of literary comprehension: A cognitive approach. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R.A., & Radvansky, G.A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (96)

Cited by 96 other publications

Antonini, Alessio, Sam Brooker & Lovro Škopljanac
2024. Spontaneous transmedia co-location: Integration in memory. Memory, Mind & Media 3 DOI logo
Dotan, Shahar & Tami Katzir
2024. The effect of modality on reading comprehension of struggling and typical readers in the second and third grades. Journal of Research in Reading 47:3 ► pp. 292 ff. DOI logo
Green, Melanie C. & Markus Appel
2024. Narrative transportation: How stories shape how we see ourselves and the world [Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 70], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hakemulder, Frank & Anne Mangen
2024. Literary Reading on Paper and Screens: Associations Between Reading Habits and Preferences and Experiencing Meaningfulness. Reading Research Quarterly 59:1 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Hranchak, Tetiana, Nicholas Dease & Irene Lopatovska
2024. Mobile phone use among Ukrainian and US students: a library perspective. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication 73:1/2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Jeske, Ingrid C.
2024. Kindgerechte Serious Games für den Grundschulunterricht – Überlegungen zur Wahl einer geeigneten App. In Serious Games und Gamification in der schulischen Bildung, ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Nery, Isabel
2024. Neurosciences of Communication: A Multidisciplinary Approach. In Our Brain and the News, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Nery, Isabel
2024. Discussion: The Psychophysiological Impact of Journalism. In Our Brain and the News, ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Russell, Eric-John
2024. Certainty in an Uncertain World: Toward A Critical Theory of Opinion. Critical Sociology 50:4-5 ► pp. 691 ff. DOI logo
Spjeldnæs, Kari & Faltin Karlsen
2024. How digital devices transform literary reading: The impact of e-books, audiobooks and online life on reading habits. New Media & Society 26:8 ► pp. 4808 ff. DOI logo
Syal, Samira, Marcia Davis, Xiaodong Zhang, Jason Schoeneberger, Samantha Spinney, Douglas J. Mac Iver & Martha Mac Iver
2024. A Person-Centered Approach to Understanding Adolescents’ Reading Motivation and Its Relation to Reading Outcomes. Reading Psychology 45:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Huimin, Boon Giin Lee, Dave Towey, Kaiyi Chen, Yichu Fang, Runzhou Zhang & Matthew Pike
2024. 2024 IEEE 48th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), ► pp. 611 ff. DOI logo
van de Ven, Inge
2024. Attentional modulation in literary reading: A theoretical‐empirical framework. Orbis Litterarum 79:2 ► pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Jianfeng, Dongfang Jiao, Yuting Cai, Songyang Guo, Yuyun Chen, Chengmin Li & Hongchun Yang
2024. Personalized social reading: The effect of text markers and font size on the reading experience. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 103 ► pp. 103626 ff. DOI logo
Brüggemann, Thomas, Ulrich Ludewig, Ramona Lorenz & Nele McElvany
2023. Effects of mode and medium in reading comprehension tests on cognitive load. Computers & Education 192 ► pp. 104649 ff. DOI logo
Fang, Lan & Li Xiangming
2023. Promoting Young Adolescents’ Reading Performance: Evidence from Narrative Transportation on Multimodality Readings. Computers in the Schools 40:3 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Jennes, Iris, Elias Blanckaert & Wendy Van den Broeck
2023. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences, ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Kokkola, Lydia
2023. Directions of Desire: Reading the Adolescent Body. International Research in Children's Literature 16:1 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Kwok, Alex Pak Ki, Mian Yan, Zhe Hao Xu, Jing Yun Lin, Run Da Chen & Shi Long Wen
2023. Effects of line length, number of lines, line spacing, and font size on reading performance of Chinese text in virtual reality environment. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 96 ► pp. 103469 ff. DOI logo
Balling, Gitte & Lisbet Vestergaard
2022. Børns læselyst - en analyse af de seneste 20 års kulturpolitiske argumenter og strategier i Danmark. Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift 25:3 ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Bon, Esmeralda V. & Michael Burke
2022. Devices, Settings and Distractions: A Study into How Students Read Literature. In Pedagogical Stylistics in the 21st Century, ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Bresó-Grancha, Noemí, María José Jorques-Infante & Carmen Moret-Tatay
2022. Reading digital- versus print-easy texts: a study with university students who prefer digital sources. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 35:1 DOI logo
Clinton-Lisell, Virginia
2022. Reading medium and interest: effects and interactions. Educational Psychology 42:2 ► pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Frean, Jennifer
2022. Comprehension across disciplines: A practical framework for reading research. Literacy 56:4 ► pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Jian, Yu-Cin
2022. Reading in print versus digital media uses different cognitive strategies: evidence from eye movements during science-text reading. Reading and Writing 35:7 ► pp. 1549 ff. DOI logo
Kovacevic, Nikola, Maheshya Weerasinghe & Jordan Aiko Deja
2022. Companion Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, ► pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Kuhn, Axel, Annika Schwabe, Hajo Boomgarden, Lukas Brandl, Günther Stocker, Gerhard Lauer, Ina Brendel-Kepser & Marion Krause-Wolters
2022. Who gets lost? How digital academic reading impacts equal opportunity in higher education. New Media & Society ► pp. 146144482110723 ff. DOI logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka, Markéta Supa & Martin Nekola
2022. Children’s perspectives on being absorbed when reading fiction: A Q methodology study. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Liu, Wei, Heng Huang, Atif Saleem & Zhongping Zhao
2022. The effects of university students’ fragmented reading on cognitive development in the new media age: evidence from Chinese higher education. PeerJ 10 ► pp. e13861 ff. DOI logo
Mastrobattista, Ludovica & Javier Merchán-Sánchez-Jara
2022. Identificación y análisis de factores de desapego de la lectura digital en el entorno académico: una revisión crítica de la bibliografía. El Profesional de la información DOI logo
Petrová, Zuzana
2022. Medium-specific aspects of digital reading and their impact on reading comprehension. Human Affairs 32:2 ► pp. 134 ff. DOI logo
Strouse, Gabrielle A., Steven R. Chesnut, Lisa A. Newland, Daniel J. Mourlam, Danielle Hertel & Brandon Nutting
2022. Preschoolers’ electrodermal activity and story comprehension during print and digital shared reading. Computers & Education 183 ► pp. 104506 ff. DOI logo
Toroujeni, Seyyed Morteza Hashemi
2022. Computerized testing in reading comprehension skill: investigating score interchangeability, item review, age and gender stereotypes, ICT literacy and computer attitudes. Education and Information Technologies 27:2 ► pp. 1771 ff. DOI logo
Trasmundi, Sarah Bro, Juan Toro & Anne Mangen
2022. Human Pacemakers and Experiential Reading. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Andersen, Tore Rye, Stefan Kjerkegaard & Birgitte Stougaard Pedersen
2021. Introduction. Poetics Today 42:2 ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Fortunati, Leopoldina & John O’Sullivan
2021. Reading and writing news: Why consumption and production modes matter. Journalism 22:9 ► pp. 2421 ff. DOI logo
Gaillard, Stefan, Zoril A. Oláh, Stephan Venmans & Michael Burke
2021. Countering the Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Underpinnings Behind Susceptibility to Fake News: A Review of Current Literature With Special Focus on the Role of Age and Digital Literacy. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
Inie, Nanna, Louise Barkhuus & Claus Brabrand
2021. Interacting with academic readings — A comparison of paper and laptop. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 4:1 ► pp. 100226 ff. DOI logo
Jeong, You Jin & Gahgene Gweon
2021. Advantages of Print Reading over Screen Reading: A Comparison of Visual Patterns, Reading Performance, and Reading Attitudes across Paper, Computers, and Tablets. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 37:17 ► pp. 1674 ff. DOI logo
Kosch, Lukas, Günther Stocker, Annika Schwabe & Hajo G. Boomgaarden
2021. Reading fiction with an e-book or in print. Scientific Study of Literature 11:2 ► pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Rosa, Lotta-Sofia La & Aku-Ville Lehtimäki
2021. Absorbing narratives and Motivation to Read. Scientific Study of Literature 11:1 ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
Stougaard Pedersen, Birgitte, Maria Engberg, Iben Have, Ayoe Quist Henkel, Sarah Mygind & Helle Bundgaard Svendsen
2021. To Move, to Touch, to Listen: Multisensory Aspects of the Digital Reading Condition. Poetics Today 42:2 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Bailey, Gavin, Deepak Ranjan Sahoo & Matt Jones
2020. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, ► pp. 885 ff. DOI logo
Böhme, Richard & Meike Munser-Kiefer
2020. Lernunterstützung mit digitalen Unterrichtsmaterialien. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung ► pp. 427 ff. DOI logo
Guerberof-Arenas, Ana & Antonio Toral
2020. The impact of post-editing and machine translation on creativity and reading experience. Translation Spaces 9:2 ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Guerberof-Arenas, Ana & Antonio Toral
2024. To be or not to be. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 36:2 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Haddock, Geoffrey, Colin Foad, Victoria Saul, Will Brown & Rose Thompson
2020. The medium can influence the message: Print‐based versus digital reading influences how people process different types of written information. British Journal of Psychology 111:3 ► pp. 443 ff. DOI logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka, Theresa Schilhab & Michael Burke
2020. m-Reading: Fiction reading from mobile phones. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 26:2 ► pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Schwabe, Annika, Lukas Brandl, Hajo G. Boomgaarden & Günther Stocker
2020. Literatur am Bildschirm. Orbis Litterarum 75:5 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Schwabe, Annika, Lukas Brandl, Hajo G. Boomgaarden & Günther Stocker
2021. Experiencing literature on the e‐reader: the effects of reading narrative texts on screen. Journal of Research in Reading 44:2 ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Soto-Sanfiel, María-Teresa & Ariadna Angulo-Brunet
2020. How European adolescents get engaged with films?: Psychometric properties of the narrative engagement scale. El profesional de la información DOI logo
Vanhees, Claudio, Mathea Simons & Vanessa Joosen
2020. Desirability of Multimedia Hyperlinks in Fiction to Foster Pupil Reading Motivation and Immersion. In Recent Tools for Computer- and Mobile-Assisted Foreign Language Learning [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Vanhees, Claudio, Mathea Simons & Vanessa Joosen
2023. Hyperlink desirability in adolescent fiction: location and absorption. Computer Assisted Language Learning 36:3 ► pp. 486 ff. DOI logo
Bailey, Gavin
2019. Bridging the Gap Between the Digital and Print Reading Experience. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction 11:4 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Cavalli, Eddy, Pascale Colé, Hélène Brèthes, Elise Lefevre, Samuel Lascombe & Jean-Luc Velay
2019. E-book reading hinders aspects of long-text comprehension for adults with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia 69:2 ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Clinton, Virginia
2019. Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Reading 42:2 ► pp. 288 ff. DOI logo
Fabry, Regina E. & Karin Kukkonen
2019. Reconsidering the Mind-Wandering Reader: Predictive Processing, Probability Designs, and Enculturation. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Flynn, Simon & Mark Hardman
2019. The Use of Interactive Fiction to Promote Conceptual Change in Science. Science & Education 28:1-2 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Mark B. Houston
2019. Entertainment Product Decisions, Episode 2: Search Qualities and Unbranded Signals. In Entertainment Science, ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Kucirkova, Natalia
2019. How Could Children’s Storybooks Promote Empathy? A Conceptual Framework Based on Developmental Psychology and Literary Theory. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
Mangen, Anne, Gérard Olivier & Jean-Luc Velay
2019. Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story?. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
Pianzola, Federico, Katalin Bálint & Jessica Weller
2019. Virtual reality as a tool for promoting reading via enhanced narrative absorption and empathy. Scientific Study of Literature 9:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Ying, Joanna C. Yau & Stephanie M. Reich
2019. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ► pp. 432 ff. DOI logo
Avramova, Yana R., Patrick De Pelsmacker & Nathalie Dens
2018. How reading in a foreign versus native language moderates the impact of repetition-induced brand placement prominence on placement responses. Journal of Brand Management 25:6 ► pp. 500 ff. DOI logo
Beelders, Tanya R. & Jean-Pierre L. du Plessis
2018. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Delgado, Pablo, Cristina Vargas, Rakefet Ackerman & Ladislao Salmerón
2018. Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review 25 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Halim, Ferdinand S. S. & Ari Widyanti
2018. 2018 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI), ► pp. 154 ff. DOI logo
Kaakinen, Johanna K., Orsolya Papp-Zipernovszky, Egon Werlen, Nuria Castells, Per Bergamin, Thierry Baccino & Arthur M. Jacobs
2018. Chapter 6. Emotional and motivational aspects of digital reading. In Learning to Read in a Digital World [Studies in Written Language and Literacy, 17], ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Koopman, Eva Maria (Emy)
2018. Does Originality Evoke Understanding? The Relation between Literary Reading and Empathy. Review of General Psychology 22:2 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka, Patrícia Dias, Ana Vogrinčič Čepič, Anne‐Mette Bech Albrechtslund, André Casado, Marina Kotrla Topić, Xavier Mínguez López, Skans Kersti Nilsson & Inês Teixeira‐Botelho
2018. Reading and company: embodiment and social space in silent reading practices. Literacy 52:2 ► pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Matheson, Heath E. & Lawrence W. Barsalou
2018. Embodiment and Grounding in Cognitive Neuroscience. In Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Schugar, Jordan & Heather Schugar
2018. eTexts and Teacher Education. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 10:2 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Thurman, Neil
2018. Newspaper Consumption in the Mobile Age. Journalism Studies 19:10 ► pp. 1409 ff. DOI logo
Turner, Rose & Fatima M. Felisberti
2018. Relationships between fiction media, genre, and empathic abilities. Scientific Study of Literature 8:2 ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Vogrinčič Čepič, Ana, Anežka Kuzmičová & Patrícia Dias
2018. Vpliv fizičnega prostora in družbenega okolja na bralno izkušnjo: izsledki študije šestih fokusnih skupin. Knjižnica: revija za področje bibliotekarstva in informacijske znanosti 62:3 DOI logo
Bailey, Gavin, Deepak Sahoo & Matt Jones
2017. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, ► pp. 446 ff. DOI logo
Baron, Naomi S., Rachelle M. Calixte & Mazneen Havewala
2017. The persistence of print among university students: An exploratory study. Telematics and Informatics 34:5 ► pp. 590 ff. DOI logo
Hermena, Ehab W., Mercedes Sheen, Maryam AlJassmi, Khulood AlFalasi, Maha AlMatroushi & Timothy R. Jordan
2017. Reading Rate and Comprehension for Text Presented on Tablet and Paper: Evidence from Arabic. Frontiers in Psychology 8 DOI logo
Hou, Jinghui, Justin Rashid & Kwan Min Lee
2017. Cognitive map or medium materiality? Reading on paper and screen. Computers in Human Behavior 67 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Jana Lüdtke
2017. Chapter 4. Immersion into narrative and poetic worlds. In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27], ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Kuiken, Don & Shawn Douglas
2017. Chapter 11. Forms of absorption that facilitate the aesthetic and explanatory effects of literary reading. In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27], ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Rutherford, Leonie, Lisa Waller, Margaret Merga, Michelle McRae, Elizabeth Bullen & Katya Johanson
2017. Contours of Teenagers’ Reading in the Digital Era: Scoping the Research. New Review of Children's Literature and Librarianship 23:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Schilhab, Theresa
2017. Adaptive Smart Technology Use: The Need for Meta-Self-Regulation. Frontiers in Psychology 8 DOI logo
Burke, Michael, Anezka Kuzmicova, Anne Mangen & Theresa Schilhab
2016. Empathy at the confluence of neuroscience and empirical literary studies. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Chesnokova, Anna
2016. Chapter 6. Empirical stylistics in an EFL teaching context. In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 24], ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Goodman, Sara G., Travis L. Seymour & Barrett R. Anderson
2016. Achieving the performance benefits of hands-on experience when using digital devices: A representational approach. Computers in Human Behavior 59 ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
Mangen, Anne
2016. The Digitization of Literary Reading. Orbis Litterarum 71:3 ► pp. 240 ff. DOI logo
Mangen, Anne & Roger Säljö
2016. Lesing og teknologiske grensesnitt: noen refleksjoner omkring behovet for tverrvitenskapelighet. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift 100:2 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Mangen, Anne & Adriaan van der Weel
2016. The evolution of reading in the age of digitisation: an integrative framework for reading research. Literacy 50:3 ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
McKay, Dana & George Buchanan
2016. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Mizrachi, Diane
2016. Buy, borrow, or access online?. Reference Services Review 44:4 ► pp. 583 ff. DOI logo
Obaid, Mohammad, Ilgιm Veryeri Alaca, Paweł W. Woźniak, Lars Lischke & Mark Billinghurst
2016. Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yuill, Nicola & Alex F. Martin
2016. Curling Up With a Good E-Book: Mother-Child Shared Story Reading on Screen or Paper Affects Embodied Interaction and Warmth. Frontiers in Psychology 7 DOI logo
McKay, Dana, Wally Smith & Shanton Chang
2015. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction, ► pp. 517 ff. DOI logo
Tveit, Åse Kristine & Anne Mangen
2014. A joker in the class: Teenage readers' attitudes and preferences to reading on different devices. Library & Information Science Research 36:3-4 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Il lettore 'distratto' [Studi e saggi, 230], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.