Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 5:2 (2015) ► pp.229249
Ablali, D
(2006) Écrire en critique: Exploration morpho-syntaxique sur corpus. In C. Duteil & B. Foulquié (Eds.), Corpus en Lettres et Sciences sociales: des documents numériques à l’interprétation. Actes du colloque international d’Albi, juillet 2006 (pp. 207–214). Paris, France: Editeru Textot. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Altmann, G
(2013) Aspects of word length. In R. Köhler & G. Altmann (Eds.), Issues in quantitativel linguistics, 31, 23–38. Lüdenscheid, Deutschland: RAM.Google Scholar
Altmann, U., Bohrn, I.C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A.M
(2012) Fact vs fiction—how paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 22–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M
(1984) Problems of Dostoesvsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P
(2003) Psychonarratology. Foundations for the empirical study of literary response. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dimigen, O., Sommer, W., Hohlfeld, A., Jacobs, A.M., & Kliegl, R
(2011) Co-registration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: Analyses and review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 552–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, T
(1983) Literary theory: An introduction. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eco, U
(1979) Lector in fabula. Milano, Italia: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Fish, S
(1980) Is there a text in this class. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Forgacs, B., Bohrn, I.C., Baudewig, J., Hofmann, M.J., Pleh, C., & Jacobs, A.M
(2012) Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun-noun compound words. Neuroimage, 63(3), 1432–1442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grzybek, P
(2014) Word Length. In: Taylor, John R. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grzybek, P., & Altmann, G
(2002) Oscillation in the frequency-length relationship. Glottometrics, 61, 97–107.Google Scholar
Grzybek, P., & Stadlober, E
(2007) Do we have problems with Arens’ law? A new look at the sentence-word relation. In P. Grzybek & R. Köhler (Eds.), Exact methods in the study of language and text. Dedicated to Gabriel Altmann on the occasion of his 75th birthday (pp. 205–217). Berlin, Deutschland: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grzybek, P., Stadlober, E., & Kelih, E
(2007) The relationship of word length and sentence length. The Inter-Textual Perspective. In R. Decker & H.-J. Lenz (Eds.), Advances in data analysis (pp. 611–618). Berlin, Deutschland: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D
(1998) The genre-specific hypothesis of reading: Reading poetry and reading encyclopedic items. Poetics, 26(2), 63–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgments. Poetics, 231, 363–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffstaedter, P
(1986) Poetizität aus der Sicht des Lesers. Eine empirische Untersuchung der Rolle von Text-, Leser- und Kontexteigenschaften bei der poetischen Verarbeitung von Texten. Hamburg, Deutschland: H. Buske.Google Scholar
Hofmann, M.J., & Jacobs, A.M
(2014) Interactive activation and competition models and semantic context: From behavioral to brain data. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46(1), 85–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutzler, F., Braun, M., Vo, M.L.H., Engl, V., Hofmann, M., Dambacher, M., et al.
(2007) Welcome to the real world: Validating fixation-related brain potentials for ecologically valid settings. Brain Research, 11721, 124–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iser, W
(1976) The act of reading. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A.M
(2011) Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: Elements of a model of literary reading). In R. Schrott, & A.M. Jacobs (Eds.), Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (pp. 492–450). München, Deutschland: Hanser.Google Scholar
(2013) Neurocognitive model of literary reading. Retrieved from [URL]
Jakobson R
(1987) Language in literature (K. Pomorska & S. Rudy, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jauss H.R
(1967) Literaturgeschichte als Provokation der Literaturwissenschaft. Konstanz, Deutschland: Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A., & Wooley, J.D
(1982) Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kao J., Ryan R., Dye M., & Ramscar M
(2010) An acquired taste: How reading literature affects sensitivity to word distributions when judging literary texts. Proceedings of the 32nd Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society , Portland, OR. Retrieved from [URL]
Karlgren, J., & Cutting, D
(1994) Recognizing text genres with simple metrics using discriminant analysis proceeding COLING ‘94. Proceedings of the 15th conference on Computational linguistics , 21, 1071–1075. DOI logo
Kneepkens, L.J., & Zwaan, R.A
(1994) Emotion and cognition in literary understanding. Poetics, 231, 125–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D. Philipps, L., Gregus, M., Miall, D.S., Verbitsky, M., & Tonkonogy, A
(2004) Locating self-modyfying feelings within literary reading. Discourse processes, 381, 267–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G., & Short, M
(2007) Style in fiction. A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Levin, S.R
(1963) Deviation–statistical and determinate–in poetic language. Lingua 121, 276–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdtke, J., Meyer-Sickendieck, B., & Jacobs, A.M
(2014), Immersing in the stillness of an early morning: Testing the mood empathy hypothesis of poetry reception. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 363–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McQuarrie, E.F., & Mick, D.G
(1996) Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 191, 424–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meutsch, D
(1987) Literatur verstehen. Eine empiristische Studie. Wiesbaden, Deutschland: Vieweg & Teubner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D., & Kuiken, D
(1994), Foregrounding, defamiliarization and affect, Response to literary stories. Poetics, 221, 389–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness. Poetics, 251, 327–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 281, 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukarovský, J
(1932/1964) Standard language and poetic language. In P.L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague School Reader on aesthetics, literary structure, and style. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Sanford, A., & Emmott, C
(2012) Mind, brain and narrative. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A.J, Dawydiak, E., & Emmott
(2006) External and internal sources of attention control: Findings from change detection. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse . Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Schmidt, S
(1980) Grundriß der empirischen Literaturwissenschaft. Wiesbaden, Deutschland: Vieweg & Teubner.Google Scholar
Sereno, S.C., Rayner, K., & Posner, M
(1998) Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 91, 2195–2200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shklovsky, V
(1917/1965) Art as technique. In L.T. Lemon & M.J. Reis (Eds.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Sopčák, P
(2007) Creating from nothing. A foregrounding study of James Joyce’s drafts for Ulysses. Language and Literature, 161, 183–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P
(2002) Cognitive poetics. An introduction. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T
(1979) Advice on theoretical poetics. Poetics, 81, 569–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W., Hakemulder, J, & Zygnier, S
(2007) Lines on feeling: Foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning. Language and Literature, 16(2), 197–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W., & Hakemulder, J.F
(2006) Foregrounding. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W
(1986) Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London, United Kingdom: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Vespignani, F., Egidi, G., & Salgaro, M
(2013)  Literary attitude affects lexical access, Escop (Eighteenth Meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology) , Budapest 29 August – 1 September. DOI logo
Xiao, Z., & McEnery, A
(2005) Two approaches to genre analysis: Three genres in modern American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 33(1), 62–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winko, S., Jannidis, F., & Lauer, G
(2009) Grenzen der Literatur. Zu Begriff und Phänomen des Literarischen. Berlin, Deutschland: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yong, B.L., & Myaeng, S.H
(2002) Text genre classification with genre-revealing and subject-revealing features. In Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval , 145–150.
Zwaan, R
(1991) Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation. Poetics, 201, 139–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Effects of Genre Expectations on Text Comprehension. Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(4), 920–933. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Bruhn, Mark J.
2018. Citation analysis. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Form, Sven
2019. Reaching Wuthering Heights with Brave New Words: The Influence of Originality of Words on the Success of Outstanding Best‐Sellers. The Journal of Creative Behavior 53:4  pp. 508 ff. DOI logo
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2018. (Neuro-)Cognitive poetics and computational stylistics. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.