Article published In:
Transdisciplinary Approaches to Literature and Empathy
Edited by Paul Sopčák, Massimo Salgaro and J. Berenike Herrmann
[Scientific Study of Literature 6:1] 2016
► pp. 164174
References (44)
Appel, M., Koch, E., Schreier, M., & Groeben, N. (2002). Aspekte des Leseerlebens: Skalenentwicklung [Assessing experiential states during reading: Scale development]. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie [Journal of Media Psychology], 141, 149–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., and Jacobs, A. M. (2013). When we like what we know — a parametric fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity. Brain Lang., 1241, 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, M., Jacobs, A. M., Hahne, A., Ricker, B., Hofmann, M., and Hutzler, F. (2006). Model-generated lexical activity predicts graded ERP amplitudes in lexical decision. Cogn. Brain Res. 1073-1074, 431–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, M. (2011). Literary Reading, Cognition and Emotion: An Exploration of the Oceanic Mind. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dixon, P., & Bortolussi, M. (2012). The puzzle of memory for literary text. Fictions, 111, 25–40.Google Scholar
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M. (2015). Measuring Literary Experience: Comment on Jacobs (2015). Scientific Study of Literature, 5(2), 178–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R. (2004). Consciousness, art and the brain: lessons from Marcel Proust. Conscious. Cogn. 131, 213–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs T and Koch SC (2014) Embodied affectivity: on moving and being moved. Front. Psychol., 51, 508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T. and Koch, S.C. (2014). Embodied affectivity: on moving and being moved. Front Psychol, 5:508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 1031, 518–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Havas, M., Gutowski, K. A., Lucarelli, M. J., Davidson, R. J., Havas, D. A., and Glenberg, A. (2010). Cosmetic use of Botulinum Toxin-A affects processing of emotional language. Psychol. Sci. 211, 95–900. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Interactive activation and competition models and semantic context: from behavioral to brain data. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 461, 85–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffstaedter, P. (1987). Poetic text processing and its empirical investigation. Poetics, 161, 75–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurlburt, R.T. and Heavey, C.L. (2001), ‘Telling what we know: describing inner experience’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 51, pp. 400–3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iser, W. (1972). The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach. New Literary History, 31, 279–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingarden, R. (1973). The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art, transl. Ruth Ann Crowley/Kenneth Olsen, Evanston.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A.M. (2011). Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Models des literarischen Lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: elements of a model of literary reading). In R. Schrott & A.M. Jacobs (Eds.), Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie Wir Unsere Wirklichkei Konstruieren (Brain and Poetry: How We Construct Our Realities) (pp. 492–520). München: Carl Hanser Verlag.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2015a). Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 91, 186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. (2015b). The scientific study of literary experience: Sampling the state of the art. Scientific Study of Literature, 5(2), 139–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., and Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition: sampling the state of the art. J. Exp. Psy. Human, 201, 1311–1334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A.M., Graf, R., Kinder, A., 2003. Receiver-operating characteristics in the lexical decision task: evidence for a simple signal detection process simulated by the multiple read-out model. J. Exper. Psychol., Learn., Mem., Cogn., 291, 481–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., Braun, M., Briesemeister, B., Conrad, M., Hofmann, M., Kuchinke, L., Lüdtke, J., & Braun, M. (2015). 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 61, 714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A.M., Lüdtke, J., Aryani, A., Meyer-Sickendiek, B., & Conrad, M. (2016). Mood-empathic and aesthetic responses in poetry reception: A model-guided, multilevel, multimethod approach. Scientific Study of Literature, 6:1 (2016), 88–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinder, A., Shanks, D. R., Cock, J., & Tunney, R. J. (2003). Recollection, Fluency, and the Explicit/Implicit Distinction in Artificial Grammar Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychol-ogy: General, 132(4), 551–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koelsch S, Jacobs AM, Menninghaus W, Liebal K, Klann-Delius G, von Scheve C, et al. (2015). The quartet theory of human emotions: an integrative and neurofunctional model. Phys Life Rev, 131, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D. (2008). A theory of expressive reading. In S. Zyngier, M. Bortolussi, A. Chesnokova, & J. Auracher (Eds.), Directions in empirical literary studies (pp. 49–73). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). The symptoms of science in studies of literature: An uneasy prognosis. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(1), 182–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Campbell, P., & Sopcák, P. (2012). The experiencing questionnaire: Locating exceptional reading moments. Scientific Study of Literature, 21, 243–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzmičová, A. (2014). Literary narrative and mental imagery: A view from embodied cognition. Style, 48(3), 275–293.Google Scholar
Long, S.A., Winograd, PN, & Bridge, CA (1989). The effects of reader and text characteristics on reports of imagery during and after reading. Reading Research Quarterly 241, 353–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangan, B. (1993). Taking phenomenology seriously: The “fringe” and its implications for cognitive research, Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 89–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadoski, M., E.T. Goetz, A. Olivarez Jr., S. Lee and N.M. Roberts (1990). Imagination in story reading: The role of imagery, verbal recall, story analysis, and processing levels. Journal of Reading Behavior 22, 55–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schrott, R., and Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (Brain and Poetry: How We Construct Our Realities). München: Hanser.Google Scholar
Sopcak, P. (2007). ‘Creation from Nothing’: a foregrounding study of James Joyce’s drafts for Ulysses. Lang. Lit. 161, 183–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sopcak P., Salgaro, M., & Herrmann, B. (Eds.) (2016). Transdisciplinary Approaches to Literature and Empathy: A Special Issue. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2009). The Cognitive Poetics of Literary Resonance, Language and Cognition 11, 25–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. (1979). Advice on theoretical poetics. Poetics, 81, 569–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varela, F.J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy to the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), pp. 330–50.Google Scholar
Vaughan-Evans, A., Trefor, R., Jones, L., Lynch, P., Wyn Jones, M., & Thierry, G. (in press). Implicit detection of poetic harmony by the naïve brain, Front. Psychol.
Westbury, C. F., Shaoul, C., Hollis, G., Smithson, L., Briesemeister, B. B., Hofmann, M. J., et al. (2013). Now you see it, now you don’t: on emotion, context, and the algorithmic prediction of human imageability judgments. Front. Psychol., 41, 991. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 191, 1235–1253.Google Scholar
Willems, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2016). Caring about Dostoyevsky: The untapped potential of studying literature. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 201, 243–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Jacobs, Arthur M.
2019. Sentiment Analysis for Words and Fiction Characters From the Perspective of Computational (Neuro-)Poetics. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 6 DOI logo
Mangen, Anne, Gérard Olivier & Jean-Luc Velay
2019. Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story?. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Roel M. Willems
2018. The Fictive Brain: Neurocognitive Correlates of Engagement in Literature. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Mangen, Anne, Anne Charlotte Begnum, Anežka Kuzmičová, Kersti Nilsson, Mette Steenberg & Hildegunn Støle
2018. Empathy and literary style. Orbis Litterarum 73:6  pp. 471 ff. DOI logo
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Annette Kinder
2017. “The Brain Is the Prisoner of Thought”: A Machine-Learning Assisted Quantitative Narrative Analysis of Literary Metaphors for Use in Neurocognitive Poetics. Metaphor and Symbol 32:3  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Jana Lüdtke
2017. Chapter 4. Immersion into narrative and poetic worlds. In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27],  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Jacobs, Arthur M., Sarah Schuster, Shuwei Xue & Jana Lüdtke
2017. What’s in the brain that ink may character ….. Scientific Study of Literature 7:1  pp. 4 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.