Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 7:1 (2017) ► pp.79108
References
Alexandrov, V. E.
(2007) Literature, literariness, and the brain. Comparative Literature, 59(2), 97–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attebery, B.
(2004) Fantasy as mode, genre, formula. In David Sandner (Ed.), Fantastic literature: a critical reader (pp. 293–309). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Baldick, C.
(2015) The Oxford dictionary of literary terms. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from [URL] doi:  DOI logo
Benthian, C.
(2012) The Literariness of new media art – a case for expanding the domain of literary studies. Journal of Literary Theory, 61, 311–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cawalti, R. G.
(1976) Adventure, mystery and romance: formula stories as art and popular culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P., & Bortolussi, M.
(2005) Approach and selection of popular narrative genre. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 231, 3–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) The scientific study of literature: what can, has, and should be done. Scientific Study of Literature, 11, 59–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C.
(2013) Reading other minds: effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 31, 28–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmott, C., Sanford, A. J., & Dawydiak, E. J.
(2007) Stylistics meet cognitive science: studying style in fiction and readers’ attention from an interdisciplinary perspective. Style, 411, 204–224.Google Scholar
Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E.
(2012) Reader – text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1041, 515–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fong, K., Mullin, J. B., Mullin, & Mar, R. A.
(2013) What you read matters: The role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivityPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D.
(1998) Reading poetry: an empirical investigation of formalist, stylistic, and conventionalist claims. Poetics Today, 191, 565–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inference [Def. 1]
(2016) Oxford English dictionary. Retrieved October 18, 2016, from [URL]
Iza, M., & Ezquerro, J.
(2000) Elaborative inferences. anales de psicología, 161, 227–249.Google Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 3421, 377–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keegan, K.
(2006) Why fabulist and new wave fabulist stories in an anthology named paraspheres? In Rusty Morrison and Ken Keegan (Eds.), Paraspheres: extending beyond the spheres of literary and genre fiction (pp. 625–637). Richmond, CA: Omnidawn.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W.
(1998) Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koopman, E. M.
(2016) Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 101, 82–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, E. M., & Hakemulder, F.
(2015) Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: a theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 91, 79–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslin, J.
(2012) The lies that buoy, then break a marriage, ‘Gone Girl,’ by Gillian Flynn. The New York Times, May 29. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from [URL]
Miall, D. S.
(2009) The neuropsychology of literariness [Abstract]. Conference on Neuroaesthetics, September 24–26, Copenhagen. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from [URL]
(2011) Science in the perspective of literariness. Scientific Study of Literature, 11, 7–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Foregrounding and the sublime: Shelley in Chamonix. Language and Literature, 161, 155–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahapatra, S., Das, J. P., Stack-Cutler, H., & Parrila, R.
(2010) Remediating reading comprehension difficulties: a cognitive processing approach. Reading Psychology, 311, 428–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W.
(1996) Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 141, 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S.
(2009) Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 191, 228–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panero, M. E., Black, J., Barnes, J. L., Weisberg, D. S., Goldstein, T. R., Brownell, H., & Winner, E.
(2016) Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1111, e46–e54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peretz, E.
(2014) It’s Tartt – but is it Art? Vanity Fair, July. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from [URL]
Rice, C.
(2010) Literariness. In Patrick Colm Hogan (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences (pp. 450–453), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shklovksy, V.
(1970) Sterne’s Tristram Shandy: stylistic commentary. In L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Eds., Trans.), Russian formalist criticism: four essays (pp. 25–57). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Shen, Y.
(2007) Foregrounding in poetic discourse: between deviation and cognitive constraints. Language and Literature, 16(2), 169–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simerka, B.
(2012) Cognitive theories of genre: The prototype effect and early modern Spanish tragedy. Bulletin of the Comediantes, 641, 153–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steiner, P.
(1984) Russian formalism: A metapoetics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tomashevksy, B.
(1970) Thematics. In L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Eds., Trans.), Russian Formalist criticism: four essays (pp. 61–98). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Van Peer, W.
(1986) Stylistics and psychology: investigations of foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
(2007) Introduction to foregrounding: a state of the art. Language and Literature, 161, 99–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walczyk, J. J., Wei, M., Griffith-Ross, D. A., Goubert, S. E., Cooper, A. L., & Zha, P.
(2007) Development of the interplay between automatic processes and cognitive resources in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 991, 861–887. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalen, D. H., Zunshine, L., & Holquist, M.
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Deane, Paul, Swapna Somasundaran, René R. Lawless, Hilary Persky & Colleen Appel
2019. The Key Practice, Building and Sharing Stories and Social Understandings: The Intrinsic Value of Narrative. ETS Research Report Series 2019:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Eekhof, Lynn S., Kobie van Krieken & Roel M. Willems
2022. Reading about minds: The social-cognitive potential of narratives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 29:5  pp. 1703 ff. DOI logo
Gavaler, Chris & Dan Johnson
2019. The literary genre effect. Scientific Study of Literature 9:1  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Joyce, Stephen
2018. Convergence Publishing and Prestige Niches. In Transmedia Storytelling and the Apocalypse,  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Kidd, David & Emanuele Castano
2019. Reading Literary Fiction and Theory of Mind: Three Preregistered Replications and Extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science 10:4  pp. 522 ff. DOI logo
Nicholes, Justin
2020. Science fiction prototyping’s features and impact on college students’ perceptions of writing. Scientific Study of Literature 10:1  pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
Quinlan, Joshua A. & Raymond A. Mar
2020. How Imagination Supports Narrative Experiences for Textual, Audiovisual, and Interactive Narratives. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination,  pp. 466 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Shuai, Kausalai (Kay) Wijekumar & Bing Han
2021. An Analysis of Grade 4 Reading Textbooks used in Mainland China: Do the Texts and Activities Support Higher Order Reading Comprehension Skills?. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 26:2  pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Zunshine, Lisa
2020. Embodied Social Cognition and Comparative Literature. Poetics Today 41:2  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.