Chapter 5
Five building blocks for comprehension strategy instruction
Comprehension is a complex task that is integral to success in academics and the workplace. Unfortunately, it is not a task that comes easily to all students. Hence, an important question faced by educators and researchers is how to most effectively provide students with instruction to improve comprehension, particularly on how to understand and learn from challenging texts. One promising approach is to provide students with training to use comprehension strategies. Strategies are intended to help students overcome skill and knowledge deficits by using overt techniques that mimic or support the processes integral to successful comprehension, including understanding the words and sentences in the text, making connections between sentences, and making connections to what the student already knows (i.e., prior knowledge). In this chapter, we approach these research questions by building upon the 4-pronged comprehension strategy framework proposed by McNamara, Ozuru, Best, and O’Reilly (2007). This framework describes five types of strategies that can help to scaffold reading and comprehension. We expand upon this framework by describing various contextual factors that may influence comprehension and strategy use. Further, we discuss methods to enhance strategy instruction, introducing five building blocks for effective comprehension strategy training.
Article outline
- Five building blocks for comprehension strategy instruction
- Reading comprehension
- This is a complex and challenging task for many readers
- The 4-pronged comprehension strategy framework
- Contextual factors of strategy acquisition
-
Stimulus
- Task
- Method
- Population
- The five building blocks for comprehension strategy instruction
- Varying task conditions
- Explicit instruction of strategies
- Deliberate practice opportunities
- Feedback
- Motivational components
- Conclusion
-
References
References
References
Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E.
(
1988)
The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge.
Review of Educational Research, 58, 375–404.
Allen, L. K., Crossley, S. A., Snow, E. L., & McNamara, D. S.
(
2014)
Game-based writing strategy tutoring for second language learners: Game enjoyment as a key to engagement.
Language Learning and Technology, 18, 124–150.
Anderson, N. J.
(
1991)
Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing.
The Modern Language Journal, 75, 460–472.
Balota, D. A., Flores d’Arcais, G. B., & Rayner, K.
(
1990)
Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M. S., & Arici, A.
(
2009)
Transformational play: Why educators should care about games.
Educational Leadership, 67, 76–80.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L.
(
2002)
Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Press.
Berman, I., & Biancarosa, G.
(
2005)
Reading to achieve: A governor’s guide to adolescent literacy. National governors Association Center for Best Practices. Retrieved from
[URL].
Block, E. L.
(
1986)
The comprehension strategies of second language readers.
TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463–494.
Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M.
(Eds.) (
2000)
Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Brantmeier, C.
(
2002)
Second language reading strategy research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities, and generalizability.
The Reading Matrix, 2.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P.
(
2004)
Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42.
Carrell, P. L.
(
1989)
Metacognitive awareness and second language reading.
The Modern Language Journal, 73, 121–134.
Center on Education Policy
(
2007)
Caught in the middle: Arizona’s English language learners and the high school exit exam. Washington, DC: Author.
Corbett, A. T. & Anderson, J. R.
(
2001)
Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: Impact of learning rate, achievement and attitudes. In
Proceedings of ACM CHI-2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 245–252).
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M.
(
1996)
Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422–433.
D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A.
(
2006)
Affect detection from human-computer dialogue with an intelligent tutoring system. In
J. Gratch,
M. Young,
R. Aylett,
D. Ballin, &
P. Oliver (Eds.),
Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Intelligent Virtual Agents: 6th International Conference (pp. 54–67). Berlin, Heiderlberg: Springer.
Duvivier, R. J., van Dalen, J., Muijtjens, A. M., Moulaert, V. R. M. P., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A.
(
2011)
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of clinical skills.
BMC Medical Education, 11, 101.
Engel, S.
(
1999)
Context is everything: The nature of memory. New York: Freeman.
Ericsson, K. A.
(
1996)
The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ericsson, K. A.
(
2008)
Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview.
Academic Emergency Medicine, 15, 988–994.
Ericcson, A., Krampe, R., & Tesch-Romer, C.
(
1993)
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.
Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
Everson, H., & Tobias, S.
(
1998)
The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis.
Instructional Science, 26, 65–79.
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Givón, T.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T.
(
1994)
Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.
Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A.
(
2000)
Engagement and motivation in reading. In
M. L. Kamil,
P. B. Mosenthal,
P. D. Pearson, &
R. Barr (Eds.),
Reading research handbook (Vol. III, pp. 403–424). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Haberlandt, K. F., & Graesser, A. C.
(
1985)
Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 357–374.
Healy, A., Schneider, V., & Bourne, L.
(
2012)
Empirically valid principles of training. In
A. Healy and
L. Bourne (Eds.),
Training cognition: Optimizing efficiency, durability, and generalizability (pp. 13–39). Psychology Press: New York.
Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M.
(
2000)
Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century.
Review of Educational Research.
Holman, L.
(
2000)
A comparison of computer-assisted instruction and classroom bibliographic instruction.
Reference & User Services Quarterly, 40, 53–60.
Hupbach, A., Hardt, O., Gomez, R., & Nadel, L.
(
2008)
The dynamics of memory: Context-dependent updating.
Learning and Memory, 15, 574–579.
Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S.
(
2013)
Motivation and performance in a game-based intelligent tutoring system.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 1036–1049.
Kindler, A. L.
(
2002)
Survey of the states’ limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services: 2000–2001 summary report. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition.
Kintsch, W.
(
1998)
Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Linderholm, T., Virtue, S., Tzeng, Y., & van den Broek, P. W.
(
2004)
Fluctuations in the availability of information during reading: Capturing cognitive processes using the landscape model.
Discourse Processes, 37, 165–186.
Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R.
(
1994)
Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1456–1470.
Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Mogan,A. M.
(
1987)
Effects of reading task on on-line processing of a text’s topic structure.
Discourse Processes, 10, 63–80.
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S.
(
1994)
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution.
Psychological Review, 101, 676–703.
Magliano, J. P., & Schleich, M.
(
2000)
Verb aspect and situation models.
Discourse Processes, 29, 83–112.
Maqsud, M.
(
1997)
Effects of metacognitive skills and nonverbal ability on academic achievement of high school pupils.
Educational Psychology, 17, 387–397.
Mayer, R. E.
(
1993)
Comprehension of graphics in texts: An overview.
Learning and Instruction, 3, 239–245.
McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G.
(
2011)
Relevance in text comprehension. In
M. T. McCrudden,
J. P. Magliano, &
G. Schraw (Eds.),
Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 1–17). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing
McNamara, D. S.
(
2001)
Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge.
Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51–62.
McNamara, D. S.
(Ed.) (
2007)
Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
McNamara, D. S.
(
2011)
Measuring deep, reflective comprehension and learning strategies: Challenges and successes.
Megacognition and Learning, 3, 1–11.
McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P., & Cai, Z.
(
2014)
Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNamara, D. S., Jacovina, M. E., & Allen, L. K.
(
2015)
Higher order thinking in comprehension. In
P. Afflerbach (Ed.),
Handbook of individual differences in reading: Text and context, (pp. 164–176). Taylor & Francis, Routledge: NY.
McNamara, D. S., Jacovina, M. E., Snow, E. L., & Allen, L. K.
(
2015)
From generating in the lab to tutoring systems in classrooms.
American Journal of Psychology, 128(2), 159–172.
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W.
(
1996)
Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text.
Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43.
McNamara, D. S. & Magliano, J. P.
(
2009)
Towards a comprehensive model of comprehension. In
B. Ross (Ed.),
The psychology of learning and motivation, (Vol. 51, pp. 297–384). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
McNamara, D. S., & McDaniel, M. A.
(
2004)
Suppressing irrelevant information: Knowledge activation or inhibition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 465–482.
McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T. P., Best, R. M., & Ozuru, Y.
(
2006)
Improving adolescent students’ reading comprehension with iSTART.
Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 147–171.
McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., Best, R., & O’Reilly, T.
(
2007)
The 4-pronged comprehension strategy framework. In
D. S. McNamara (Ed.),
Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 465–496). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
National Assessment Governing Board
(
2013)
Less than half of 12th Graders estimated to be academically prepared for college coursework. Washington, D.C. Retrieved Jan. 13, 2015,
[URL]
National Assessment of Educational Progress
(
2011)
The Nation’s Report Card: Writing 2011. Retrieved Nov. 5, 2012,
[URL].
Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N.
(
1996)
Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation. In
C. Cornaldi &
J. Oakhill (Eds.),
Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 69–72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
OECS
(
2014)
PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved Jan. 13, 2015,
[URL]
O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S.
(
2007)
Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers.
Discourse Processes, 43, 121–152.
Pearson, P. D.
(
1974–75)
The effects of grammatical complexity on children’s comprehension, recall and conception of semantic relations.
Reading Research Quarterly, 10, 155–192.
Perfetti, C. A.
(
2007)
Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension.
Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383.
Pressley, M., Beard El-Dinary, P., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., Almasi, J., & Brown, R.
(
1992)
Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies.
The Elementary School Journal, 92, 513–555.
Pritchard, R.
(
1990)
The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies.
Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 273–295.
Ricci, K., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A.
(
1996)
Do computer-based games facilitate knowledge acquisition and retention? Military Psychology, 8, 295–307.
Roebers, C. M., Röthlisberger, M., Cimeli, P., Michel, E., & Neuenschwander, R.
(
2011)
School enrolment and executive functioning: A longitudinal perspective on developmental changes, the influence of learning context, and the prediction of pre-academic skills.
European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 526–540.
Rowe, J., Shores, L., Mott, B., & Lester, J.
(
2011)
Integrating learning, problem solving, and engagement in narrative-centered learning environments.
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21, 115–133.
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A.
(
1992)
New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training.
Psychological Science, 3, 207–217.
Shaffer, D. W.
(
2007)
How computer games help children learn. New York: Palgrave.
Short, D. J., & Fitzsimmons, S.
(
2007)
Double the work – Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners: A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved from
[URL].
Shute, V. J.
(
2008)
Focus on formative feedback.
Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.
Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R.
(
2006)
The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis.
Personnel Psychology, 59, 623–664.
Taylor, A., Stevens, J. R., & Asher, J. W.
Van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M.
(
2001)
The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts.
Memory & Cognition, 29, 1081–1087.
Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J.
(
1988)
Understanding of anaphoric relations in skilled and less skilled comprehenders.
British Journal of Psychology, 79, 173–186.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Smith, Reid, Pamela Snow, Tanya Serry & Lorraine Hammond
2023.
Elementary Teachers' Perspectives on Teaching Reading Comprehension.
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 54:3
► pp. 888 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.