Chapter 8
Reading to learn
Developing advanced reading skills in traditional and digital environments
Rapid advances in digital technologies are transforming patterns of learning to read, as well as ‘reading to learn’. The latter refers to the process of reading in the service of learning, in school and beyond, and is a major purpose for reading beyond the earliest school years. When reading to learn, contemporary e-learning trends either promote the supplementary use of ICT in face-to-face settings or the use of such environments for comprehensive delivery of learning materials. Such changes make it imperative to understand the basic elements of reading in digital environments to support learning. In this chapter we first introduce the basic elements that can be used to build an effective digital reading environment to improve learning. The chapter then considers the instructional design principles that best promote learning through digital reading and explores the impact of digital interfaces on traditional reading-to-learn strategies.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Transition from learning to read to reading to learn
- 2.Instructional design for promoting learning through digital reading
- 3.Digital design principles
- 4.Reading strategies for learners to foster higher-order thinking skills: Use of reading strategies via digital media
- 4.1Previewing
- 4.2Generating and answering questions
- 4.3Evaluating an argument generated from the reading
- 4.4Contextualizing
- 4.5Annotating
- 4.6Recognising story/text structure
- 4.7Graphic and semantic organisers
- 4.8Keyword writing and summarising
- 5.Conclusion
-
References
References
Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T.
(
2012)
Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure.
Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1816–1828.
Al-Seghayer, K.
(
2001)
The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study.
Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 202–232.
Akbulut, Y.
(
2007)
Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language.
Instructional Science, 35(6), 499–517.
Akbulut, Y.
(
2008)
Predictors of foreign language reading comprehension in a hypermedia reading environment.
Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(1), 37–50.
Anderson, R. C., & Biddle, W. B.
(
1975)
On asking people questions about what they are reading.
Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 9, 89–132.
Andre, T.
(
1979)
Does answering higher-level questions while reading facilitate productive learning? Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 280–318.
Baker, E. D., Hope, L., & Karandjeff, K.
(
2009)
Contextualized teaching and learning: A faculty primer. San Francisco, CA: Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges.
Beck, I. L.
(
1997)
Questioning the author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Brown, S.
(
2016)
Young learners’ transactions with interactive digital texts using e-readers.
Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 30(1), 42–56.
Burnett, A.
(
2011)
The effects of listening previewing on fourth grade students’ acquisition of knowledge of reading vocabulary words. Retrieved on
July 6 2016 from
[URL].
Caitlin, L.
(
2015)
5 strategies for teaching close reading with tech. Retrieved on
July 6 2016 from
[URL].
Carrell, P. L.
(
1985)
Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure.
TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 727–752.
Carenini, G., & Moore, J. D.
(
2006)
Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments.
Artificial Intelligence, 170(11), 925–952.
Catlin, T.
(
2016)
StudySync is the perfect tool to develop 21st century literacy! Retrieved from
[URL].
Chandler, P., & Sweller J.
(
1991)
Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction.
Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.
Chen, H. C., & Graves, M. F.
(
1995)
Effects of previewing and providing background knowledge on Taiwanese college students’ comprehension of American short stories.
Tesol Quarterly, 29(4), 663–686.
Ciullo, S., Falcomata, T., & Vaughn, S.
(
2015)
Teaching social studies to upper elementary students with learning disabilities graphic organizers and explicit instruction.
Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(1), 15–26.
Cohen, V.
(
2006)
Strategies for comprehending electronic text in digitally mediated times. In
A. Méndez-Vilas,
A. Solano Martín, &
J. A. Mesa González (Eds.),
Current developments in technology-assisted education (pp. 170–174). Spain: FORMATEX.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E.
(
1987)
Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing (No. 403). In
L. Resnick (Ed.),
Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E.
(
1983)
Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose. In
M. Pressley &
J. R. Levin (Eds.),
Cognitive strategy research (pp. 87–131). New York: Springer.
Davey, B., & McBride, S.
(
1986)
Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 256.
Davis, D. S., & Neitzel, C.
(
2012)
Collaborative sense-making in print and digital text environments.
Reading and Writing, 25(4), 831–856.
De Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G.
(
2002)
Quality of book-reading matters for emergent readers: An experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 145.
Dewey, J.
(
1966)
Democracy and education.
New York: Free Press, 578, 53–60.
Dexter, D. D., & Hughes, C. A.
(
2011)
Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis.
Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 51–72.
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D.
(
1991)
Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction.
Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239–264.
Dole, J., Valencia, S., Greer, E., & Wardrop, J.
(
1991)
Effects of two types of prereading instruction on the comprehension of narrative and expository text.
Reading Research Quarterly, 26(2), 142–159.
Dowden, T.
(
2007)
Relevant, challenging, integrative and exploratory curriculum design: Perspectives from theory and practice for middle level schooling in Australia.
Australian Educational Researcher, 34, 51–71.
Dreyer, C., & Nel, C.
(
2003)
Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment.
System, 31(3), 349–365.
Elbro, C., Rasmussen, I., & Spelling, B.
(
1996)
Teaching reading to disabled readers with language disorders: A controlled evaluation of synthetic speech feedback.
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37(2), 140–155.
Edyburn, D. L.
(
2007)
Technology-enhanced reading performance: Defining a research agenda.
Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 146–152.
Fagella-Luby, M., Schumaker, J. S., & Deshler, D.
(
2007)
Embedded learning strategy instruction: Story-structure pedagogy in heterogeneous secondary literature classes.
Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 131–147.
Fischer, J. A.
(
1973)
Effects of cue synthesis procedure and postquestions on the retention of prose material.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 34, 615.
Haring, N., Lovitt, T., Eaton, M., & Hansen, C.
(
1978)
Classroom organization and management. The fourth R: research in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Hawkins, R. O., Musti-rao, S., Hale, A., McGuire, S., & Hailley, J.
(
2010)
Examining listening previewing as a classwide strategy to improve reading comprehension and vocabulary.
Psychology in the Schools, 47(9), 903–916.
Heller, R., & Greenleaf, C. L.
(
2007)
Literacy instruction in the content areas: Getting to the core of middle and high school improvement. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Herold, B.
(
2014)
Research drives teacher training for digital reading.
Education Week. Retrieved on
May 7 2014 from
[URL].
Ijaz, K., Bogdanovych, A., & Trescak, T.
(
2016)
Virtual worlds vs books and videos in history education.
Interactive Learning Environments, 1–26.
Johnson, T. E., Archibald, T. N., & Tenenbaum, G.
(
2010)
Individual and team annotation effects on students’ reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills.
Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1496–1507.
Jones, B. F., Pierce, J., & Hunter, B.
(
1988)
Teaching students to construct graphic representations.
Educational Leadership, 46(4), 20–25.
Kim, A. H., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S.
(
2004)
Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD A synthesis of research.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 105–118.
King, A.
(
1994)
Autonomy and question asking: The role of personal control in guided student-generated questioning.
Learning and Individual Differences, 6(2), 163–185.
Korat, O.
(
2010)
Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade.
Computers & Education, 55(1), 24–31.
Korat, O., & Shamir, A.
(
2007)
Electronic books versus adult readers: Effects on children’s emergent literacy as a function of social class.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 248–259.
Korat, O., & Shamir, A.
(
2008)
The educational electronic book as a tool for supporting children’s emergent literacy in low versus middle SES groups.
Computers & Education, 50(1), 110–124.
Kozma, R. B.
(
1991)
Learning with media.
Review of Educational Research, 61, 179–211.
Kozma, R. B.
(
1992)
Constructing knowledge with learning tool. In
P. Kommers,
D. Jonassen, &
T. Mayes (Eds.),
Cognitive tools for learning (pp. 23–32). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Lauterman, T., & Ackerman, R.
(
2014)
Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration.
Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 455–463.
Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A.
(
2010)
Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A.
(
2013)
New literacies: A dual level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In
D. Alvermann,
N. J. Unrau, &
R. B. Ruddell (Eds.),
Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1150–1182). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Levin, J. R., & Pressley, M.
(
1981)
Improving children’s prose comprehension: Selected strategies that seem to succeed. In
C. M. Santa &
B. L. Hayes (Eds.),
Children’s prose comprehension: Research and practice (pp. 44–71). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Loranger, A. L.
(
1994)
The study strategies of successful and unsuccessful high school students.
Journal of Literacy Research, 26(4), 347–360.
Lorenz, B., Green, T., & Brown, A.
(
2009)
Using multimedia graphic organizer software in the prewriting activities of primary school students: What are the benefits?.
Computers in the Schools, 26(2), 115–129.
Maclellan, E.
(
1997)
Reading to learn.
Studies in Higher Education, 22(3), 277–288.
Mayer, R. E.
(
1997)
Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1–19.
Mayer, R. E.
(
2005a)
Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pretraining, and modality principles. In
R. E. Mayer (Ed.),
The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp.169–182). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E.
(
2005b)
Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In
R. E. Mayer (Ed.),
The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp.183–200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E.
(
2005c)
Principles of multimedia learning based on social cues: Personalization, voice, and image principles. In
R. E. Mayer (Ed.),
The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 201–212). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E.
(
2009)
Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & DaPra, C. S.
(
2012)
An embodiment effect in computer-based learning with animated pedagogical agents.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(3), 239–252.
Mazzeo, C., Rab, S. Y., & Alssid, J. L.
(
2003)
Building bridges to college and careers: Contextualized basic skills programs at community colleges. Brooklyn, NY, and San Francisco, CA: Work Strategy Center.
McCormick, S.
(
1989)
Effects of previews on more skilled and less skilled readers’ comprehension of expository text.
Journal of Literacy Research, 21(3), 219–239.
Merga, M. K.
(
2014)
Are teenagers “really” keen digital readers? Adolescent engagement in ebook reading and the relevance of paper books today.
English in Australia, 49(1), 27–37.
Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., & Pratt, J.
(
1996)
Reclaiming instructional design.
Educational Technology, 36, 5–7.
Meyer, B. J., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J.
(
1980)
Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students.
Reading Research Quarterly, 72–103.
Montali, J., & Lewandowski, L.
(
1996)
Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(3), 271–279.
Nist, S. L., & Simpson, M. L.
(
1988)
The effectiveness and efficiency of training college students to annotate and underline text. In
National Reading Conference Yearbook
. National Reading Conference, 37, 251–257.
Novak, E., Razzouk, R., & Johnson, T. E.
(
2012)
The educational use of social annotation tools in higher education: A literature review.
The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 39–49.
Paivio, A.
(
1986)
Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L.
(
1984)
Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities.
Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
Pearson, P. D.
(
2010)
Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other.
Science, 328, 459–463.
Perin, D.
(
2011)
Facilitating student learning through contextualization: A review of evidence.
Community College Review, 39(3), 268–295.
Porter-O’Donnell, C.
(
2004)
Beyond the yellow highlighter: Teaching annotation skills to improve reading comprehension.
English Journal, 93, 82–89.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P.
(
1995)
Verbal protocols of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Puente, K.
(
2012)
Empowering students with digital reading.
District Administration, 48(5), 38–42.
Razon, S., Turner, J., Johnson, T. E., Arsal, G., & Tenenbaum, G.
(
2012)
Effects of a collaborative annotation method on students’ learning and learning-related motivation and affect.
Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 350–359.
Rich, S., & Pressley, M.
(
1990)
Teacher acceptance of reading comprehension strategy instruction.
The Elementary School Journal, 43–64.
Rose, T. L., & Sherry, L.
(
1984)
Relative effects of two previewing procedures on LD adolescents’ oral reading performance.
Learning Disability Quarterly, 7(1), 39–44.
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S.
(
1996)
Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies.
Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221.
Sam D. P., & Rajan, P.
(
2013)
Using graphic organizers to improve reading comprehension skills for the middle school ESL students.
English Language Teaching, 6(2), 155.
Samaras, H., Giouvanakis, T., Bousiou, D., & Tarabanis, K.
(
2006)
Towards a new generation of multimedia learning research.
AACE Journal, 14(1), 3–30.
Simpson, M. L., & Nist, S. L.
(
1990)
Textbook annotation: An effective and efficient study strategy for college students.
Journal of Reading, 34(2), 122–129.
Simpson, M. L., & Nist, S. L.
(
2002)
Encouraging active reading at the college level. In
C. C. Block &
M. Pressley (Eds.),
Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 365–379). New York: The Guilford Press.
Singer, H., & Donlan, D.
(
1982)
Active comprehension: Problem-solving schema with question generation for comprehension of complex short stories.
Reading Research Quarterly, 166–186.
Singer, H.
(
1978)
Active comprehension: From answering to asking questions.
The Reading Teacher, 31(8), 901–908.
Singleton, S. M., & Filce, H. G.
(
2015)
Graphic organizers for secondary students with learning disabilities.
TEACHING Exceptional Children, 48(2), 110.
Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., & Lake, C.
(
2008)
Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis.
Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 290–322.
Spiro, R. J., DeSchryver, M., Hagerman, M. S., Morsink, P. M., & Thompson, P.
(Eds.) (
2015)
Reading at a crossroads?: Disjunctures and continuities in current conceptions and practices. New york, NY: Routledge.
Strangman, N., Hall, T., & Meyer, A.
(
2004)
Background knowledge instruction and the implications for UDL implementation. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum (Links updated 2009). Retrieved from
[URL].
Suzuki, A., Sato, T., & Awazu, S.
(
2008)
Graphic display of linguistic information in English as a Foreign Language reading.
TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 591–616.
Watts, G. H.
(
1973)
The “arousal” effect of adjunct questions on recall from prose materials.
Australian Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 81–87.
Wijekumar, K. K., Meyer, B. J., & Lei, P.
(
2012)
Large-scale randomized controlled trial with 4th graders using intelligent tutoring of the structure strategy to improve nonfiction reading comprehension.
Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 987–1013.
Wolfe, J.
(
2008)
Annotations and the collaborative digital library: Effects of an aligned annotation interface on student argumentation and reading strategies.
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 141–164.
Yu, F. Y., Chang, Y. L., & Wu, H. L.
(
2015)
The effects of an online student question-generation strategy on elementary school student English learning.
Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 10(1), 1.
Zhang, L. J., Gu, P. Y., & Hu, G.
(
2008)
A cognitive perspective on Singaporean primary school pupils’ use of reading strategies in learning to read in English.
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 245–271.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Pleau, Joannie, Jean-Bernard Carrier & Gabrielle Ross
2024.
Cocréation d’un projet d’atlas historique numérique au service des apprentissages d’élèves de première secondaire en univers social.
Revue de recherches en littératie médiatique multimodale 18
► pp. 179 ff.
ŞENDAĞ, Serkan, Mustafa CANER & Sacip TOKER
2019.
Yabancı Dil Öğrenenlerin Kullandıkları Dinleme Stratejileri İle Okumada Medya Tercihleri ve Okuma Sıklıkları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma.
Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi :52
► pp. 185 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.