Part of
It’s not all about you: New perspectives on address research
Edited by Bettina Kluge and María Irene Moyna
[Topics in Address Research 1] 2019
► pp. 355372
Alba-Juez, Laura
2009‘Little words’ in small talk: Some considerations on the use of the pragmatic narkers ‘man’ in English and ‘macho/tío’ in Peninsular Spanish. In Donna Lardiere, Héctor Campos & Ronald P. Leow (eds.), Little words: Their history, phonology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and acquisition, 171–181. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning
2012The new Russian vocative: Synchrony, diachrony, typology. Scando-Slavica 58 (1). 122–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Sally McConnell-Ginet
2003Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol
2007The vocative mate in contemporary English: A corpus-based study. In Andrea Sansò (ed.), Language resources and linguistic theory, 180–199. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen
2006Language and ethnicity. (Key topics in sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaviño Rodríguez, Victoriano
2011Operaciones metalingüísticas del marcador discursivo “hombre.” MARCO ELE Revista de didáctica de español como lengua extranjera 12. 1–11.Google Scholar
Hill, Richard
1994You’ve come a long way, dude – A history. American Speech 69 (3). 321–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2008An introduction to sociolinguistics (3rd edition). London, New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Hook, Donald D.
1984First names and titles as solidarity and power semantics in English. International Review of Applied Linguistics 22 (3). 183–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1960Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–77. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F.
2004Dude. American Dialect Society 79 (3). 281–305.Google Scholar
Kleinknecht, Friederike
2013Mexican güey – from vocative to discourse marker. A case of grammaticalization? In Barbara Sonnenhauser & Patricia Noel Aziz Hanna (eds.), Vocative! Addressing between system and performance, 235–268. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1990The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2. 205–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Principles of linguistic change, Vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1999The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In Hilde Hasselgård & Signe Oksefjell (eds.), Out of corpora. Studies in honour of Stig Johansson, 107–120. Amsterdan: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Michael J. & Anne O’Keeffe
2003What’s in a name?: Vocatives in casual conversations and radio phone-in calls. In Pepi Leistyna & Charles F. Meyer (eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use, 153–85. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCready, Eric
2008What man does. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (6). 671–724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyna, María Irene
2017 Voseo vocatives and interjections in Montevideo Spanish. In Juan José Colomina Almiñana (ed.), Contemporary advances in theoretical and applied Spanish linguistic variation, 124–147. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Palacios, Niktelol
2002Algunos marcadores discursivos característicos del habla de los adolescentes mexicanos. Iztapalapa 18 (53). 225–247.Google Scholar
Quaglio, Paulo
2009Television dialogue: The sitcom Friends vs. natural conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rendle-Short, Johanna
2009The address term mate in Australian English: Is it still a masculine term? Australian Journal of Linguistics 29 (2). 245–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010‘Mate’ as a term of address in ordinary interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (5). 1201–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojas, Darío
2012 Huevón como marcador del discurso en el español de Chile: Huellas de un proceso de gramaticalización. Revista de Humanidades 25. 145–164.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1972Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1. 179–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold
1974Hey, Whatsyourname! In Michael W. La Galy, Robert A. Fox and Anthony Bruck (eds.), Papers from the tenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 787–801. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Flesch, Marie
2023. “Dude” and “Dudette”, “Bro” and “Sis”: A Diachronic Study of Four Address Terms in the TV Corpus. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :32/2  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.