Part of
It's different with you: Contrastive perspectives on address research
Edited by Nicole Baumgarten and Roel Vismans
[Topics in Address Research 5] 2023
► pp. 142170
Afful, Joseph Benjamin A.
2006Address terms among university students in Ghana: A case study. Language and Intercultural Communication 6(1). 76–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anchimbe, Eric A. & Janney, Richard W.
2011Postcolonial pragmatics: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6). 1451–1459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, Sumana
2010Indianisation of English: Analysis of linguistic features in Selected post -1980 Indian English fiction. Concept: New Delhi.Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike
1988Terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 50) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen D. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruns, Hanna & Svenja Kranich
2021Terms of address: A contrastive investigation of ongoing changes in British, American and Indian English and in German. Contrastive Pragmatics 3(1). 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh
2009Multilingual strategies of negotiating English: From conversation to writing. JAC 29(1/2). 17–48. Retrieved 1 November 2020, from [URL].Google Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh A.
2013aTranslingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Oxford/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh
2013bNegotiating translingual literacy. Research in the Teaching of English 48. 40–67.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael
2009Address in intercultural communication across languages. Intercultural Pragmatics 6(3). 395–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby & Jane Warren
2009Language and human relations: Style of address in contemporary language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Daniel Kádár & Michael Haugh
(eds.) 2017The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Groot, Annette
2011Language and cognition in bilinguals and multilinguals: An introduction. New York: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol
2009Address strategies in a British academic setting. Pragmatics 19(2). 179–196.Google Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol & John Hajek
2016Address practices in academic interactions in a pluricentric language: Australian English, American English, and British English. Pragmatics 26(4). 631–652.Google Scholar
Gargesh, Ravinder & Anamika Sharma
2019Indian English in political discussions. World Englishes 38. 90–104.Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert. H.
1984Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
1991Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hughson, Jo-anne
2009Diversity and changing values in address: Spanish address pronoun usage in an intercultural immigrant context. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B.
1985Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle. In Randolph Quirk & Henry G. Widdowson (eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures, 11–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1988The sacred cows of English. English Today 16(4). 3–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Asian Englishes: Beyond the canon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna and Cecil L. Nelson
2006World Englishes in Asian contexts. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna & Larry E. Smith
2008Cultures, contexts and World Englishes. Routledge: New York and London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karpava, Sviatlana, Natalia Ringblom, & Anastassia Zabrodskaja
2019Translanguaging in the family context: Evidence from Cyprus, Sweden and Estonia. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23(3). 619–641. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2014Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Khalil, Amr A. & Tatiana Larina
2022Terms of endearment in American English and Syrian Arabic family discourse. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics 13(1). 27–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluge, Bettina & María Irene Moyna
König, Ekkehard
2012Contrastive linguistics and language comparison. Languages in Contrast 12(1). 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotorova, Elizaveta
2018Analysis of kinship terms using Natural Semantic Metalanguage: Anna Wierzbicka’s approach. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22(4). 701–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kumar, Ashok
1986Certain aspects of the form and functions of Hindi-English code-switching. Anthropological Linguistics 28(2). 195–205.Google Scholar
Larina, Tatiana
2015Culture-specific communicative styles as a framework for interpreting linguistic and cultural idiosyncrasies. International Review of Pragmatics 7(5). 195–215. Special Issue: Communicative Styles and Genres. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larina, Tatiana & Suryanarayan, Neelakshi
2013Madam or aunty ji: address forms in British and Indian English as a reflection of culture and cognition. In Monika Reif, Justyna A. Robinson & Martin Pütz (eds.), Variation in language and language use: Linguistic, socio-cultural and cognitive perspectives, 190–217. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Larina, Tatiana, Vladimir I. Ozyumenko & Svetlana Kurteš
2017I-identity vs we-identity in language and discourse: Anglo-Slavonic perspectives. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13(1). 195–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larina, Tatiana & Amr Khalil
2018Arabic forms of address: Sociolinguistic overview. In Irina Vladimirovna Denisova (ed.), Word, Utterance, Text: Cognitive, Pragmatic and Cultural Aspects, 299–309. London: Published by the Future Academy.Google Scholar
Larina, Tatiana, Neelakshi Suryanarayan & Julia Yuryeva
2019Socio-cultural context, address forms and communicative styles: A case study of British and Indian Englishes. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Series 2. Linguistics] 18(3). 39–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1999The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In Hilde Hasselgard & Signe Oksefjell (eds.). Out of corpora: Studies in honor of Stig Johansson, 107–118. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Tatiana Larina
2014Politeness: West and East. Russian Journal of Linguistics 4. 9–34.Google Scholar
Lewis, Gwyn, Bryn Jones & Colin Baker
2012Translanguaging: Developing its conceptualisation and contextualisation. Educational Research and Evaluation 18. 655–670. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts
2005Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of politeness research 1(1). 9–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. and Tatiana V. Larina
2019Introduction to politeness and impoliteness research in global contexts. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23(4). 873–903. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, Min-Zhan & Bruce Horner
2016Introduction: Translingual Work. College English 78(3). 207–218.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, Raja R.
1985Sociolinguistics in Hindi context. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH publishing company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Verbalization of polite behaviour in Indian English. Accessed online: February 2020. [URL].Google Scholar
Mills, Sara
2003Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Sociocultural approach to (im)politeness. In Jonathan Culpeper, Daniel Kádár & Michael Haugh (eds.), 287–323. The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mugford, Gerrard
2020Mexican politeness: An empirical study on the reasons underlying/motivating practices to construct local interpersonal relationships. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24(1). 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mühleisen, Susanne
2011Forms of address and ambiguity in Caribbean English-lexicon creoles: Strategic interactions in a postcolonial language setting. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 1460–1471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulo Farenkia, Bernard
2019Nominal address strategies in Cameroon French: Between lexical creativity and pragmatics. In Bettina Kluge & María Irene Moyna (eds.) 2019 It’s not all about ‘you’: New perspectives on address research, 335–354. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrby, Catrin & Camilla Wide
(eds.) 2015Address practice as social action: European perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Norrby, Catrin, Doris Schüpbach, John Hajek & Heinz L. Kretzenbacher
2019Introductions at international academic conferences: Address and naming in three national varieties of English. In Bettina Kluge & María Irene Moyna (eds.) 2019 It’s not all about ‘you’: New perspectives on address research, 375–396. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo, Ofelia García & Wallis Reid
2015Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review 6. 281–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parasher S. V.
1988Certain stylistic features in Indian English and their relationship to degrees of formality. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics 14(2). 95–122. Google Scholar
Pavlenko, Aneta
2014The bilingual mind and what it tells us about language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhee, Seongha
2019Politeness pressure on grammar: The case of first and second person pro-nouns and address terms in Korean. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23(4). 950–974. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1995Bilingualism (Second revised edition). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sedlatschek, Andreas
2009Contemporary Indian English: Variation and change. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smit, Ute
2010English as a Lingua Franca in higher education: A longitudinal study of classroom discourse. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suryanarayan, Neelakshi & Amr Khalil
2021Kinship terms as indicators of identity and social reality: A case study of Syrian Arabic and Hindi. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25(1). 125–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ton, Thoai N. L.
2019A literature review of address studies from pragmatic and sociolinguistic perspectives. In Bettina Kluge & María Irene Moyna (eds.) 2019 It’s not all about ‘you’: New perspectives on address research, 23–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Triandis, Harry
1994Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald
2006An introduction to sociolinguistics, 5th ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard
2003Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
2003Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. 2nd edition, Berlin, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Kinship and social cognition in Australian languages: Kayardild and Pitjantjatjara. Australian Journal of Linguistics. 33(3). 302–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Back to ‘Mother ’and ‘Father’: Overcoming the Eurocentrism of kinship studies through eight lexical universals. Current Anthropology 57(4). 408–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020Addressing God in European languages: Different meanings, different cultural attitudes. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 24(2). 259–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, Jock O.
2006Contextualizing aunty in Singaporean English. World Englishes 25(3–4). 451–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar