Cover not available
Part of
It's different with you: Contrastive perspectives on address research
Edited by Nicole Baumgarten and Roel Vismans
[Topics in Address Research 5] 2023
► pp. 245–271

Chapter 10
Nominal address and introductions in three national varieties of German

Intralinguistic variation and pragmatic transfer to English

| The University of Melbourne
| The University of Melbourne
| The University of Melbourne
| Stockholm University
Using a large-scale survey, we explore reported nominal address and introduction routines in first encounters at international academic conferences. Our focus is on variation in such routines among respondents originating in Germany, Austria and Switzerland in their first language (L1) German and in English (L2 English, their second or further language). In L1 German, introduction by first name and last name tends to be the unmarked choice, with some national variation present. Similar national variation exists in L2 English, albeit to a lesser extent, showing some pragmatic transfer from the respondents’ L1 German variety to L2 English. In comparison to the results for L1 speakers of three national varieties of English, the German L1 speakers’ emulated behaviour diverges from their L1 behaviour without necessarily reflecting English L1 behaviour in most cases.
Keywords: address, introductions, German as a pluricentric language, L2 English, academic conferences, intercultural communication, pragmatic transfer, (varieties of) German, (varieties of) English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Introductions in L1 German
      • 4.1.1Quantitative results
        • Scenario 1: Introduction of self
        • Scenario 2: Introduction of others
        • Scenario 3: Introduction by others
        • Summary of quantitative L1 German results
      • 4.1.2Qualitative results
    • 4.2Introductions in English
      • 4.2.1Quantitative results
        • Scenario 1: Introduction of self
        • Scenario 2: Introduction of others
        • Scenario 3: Introduction by others
        • Summary of L2 English results
      • 4.2.2Qualitative results for English
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 September 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tar.5.10sch
References (32)
References
Barron, Anne. 2015. Explorations in regional variation: A variational pragmatic perspective. Multilingua 34.4. 449–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 253–276. Cambridge, MA: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 1992. Epilogue. In Michael Clyne (ed.), Pluricentric languages: Differing norms in different nations, 455–465. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby & Jane Warren. 2009. Language and human relations: Styles of address in contemporary language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLisle, Helga H. 1993. Forms of address in academic settings: A contrastive analysis. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German. 26.1. 22–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehlers, Klaas-Hinrich. 2004. Zur Anrede mit Titeln in Deutschland, Österreich und Tschechien: Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenerhebung. Brücken: Germanistisches Jahrbuch Tschechien – Slowakei NF 12. 85–115.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. 2012. “Early interactions” in Australian English, American English and English English: Cultural differences and cultural scripts. Journal of Pragmatics 44. 1038–1050. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael & Donal Carbaugh. 2015. Self-disclosure in initial interactions amongst speakers of American and Australian English. Multilingua 34.4. 461–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2003. The German address system: Binary and scalar at once. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, 401–425. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kretzenbacher, Heinz L. 2010. “Man ordnet ja bestimmte Leute irgendwo ein für sich …”: Anrede und soziale Deixis. Deutsche Sprache 38.1. 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011a. Perceptions of national and regional standards of addressing in Germany and Austria. Pragmatics 21.1. 69–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b. Mikropragmatik in kommunikativen Gattungen und plurizentrischer Sprachkultur: Zur Anrede im Deutschen. In Klaus-Dieter Baumann (ed.), Fach – Translat – Kultur: Interdisziplinäre Aspekte der vernetzten Vielfalt, vol. 2, 860–899. Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
2014. Sich und andere auf internationalen wissenschaftlichen Konferenzen vorstellen: Zur sprachlichen Inszenierung von Kulturalität und lingua franca-Interkulturalität in der Wissenschaftskommunikation. In Simon Meier, Daniel H. Rellstab & Gesine Schiewer (eds.), Dialog und (Inter)Kulturalität: Theorien, Konzepte, empirische Befunde, 237–254. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Kretzenbacher, Heinz L., John Hajek & Catrin Norrby. 2013. Address and introduction across two pluricentric languages in intercultural communication. In Rudolf Muhr, Carmen Fernández Juncal & Carla Amorós Negre (eds.), Exploring linguistic standards in non-dominant varieties of pluricentric languages, 259–274. Vienna: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kretzenbacher, Heinz L., John Hajek, Catrin Norrby & Doris Schüpbach. 2020. Social deixis at international conferences: Austrian German speakers’ introduction and address behaviour in German and English. Journal of Pragmatics 169. 100–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laitinen, Mikko. 2020. Empirical perspectives on English as a lingua franca (ELF) grammar. World Englishes 39. 427–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muhr, Rudolf. 2008. The pragmatics of a pluricentric language: A comparison between Austrian German and German German. In Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds.), Variational pragmatics: A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric languages, 211–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neustupný, Jiří. V. 2004. A theory of contact situations and the study of academic interaction. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 14.1. 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrby, Catrin & Heinz L. Kretzenbacher. 2013. National variation of address in pluricentric languages: The examples of Swedish and German. In Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.), Pluricentricity: Language variation and sociocognitive dimensions, 243–267. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrby, Catrin, Doris Schüpbach, John Hajek & Heinz L. Kretzenbacher. 2019. Introductions at international academic conferences: Address and naming in three national varieties of English. In Bettina Kluge & María Irene Moyna (eds.), It’s not all about you: New perspectives on address research, 376–395. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pillet-Shore, Danielle M. 2008. Coming together: Creating and maintaining social relationships through the openings of face-to-face interactions. PhD thesis, University of California Los Angeles.
Pillet-Shore, Danielle. 2011. Doing introductions: The work involved in meeting someone new. Communication Monographs 78.1. 73–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rehbein, Jochen & Jutta Fienemann. 2004. Introductions: Being polite in multilingual settings. In Juliane House & Jochen Rehbein (eds.), Multilingual communication, 223–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P. 2019. Rethinking pragmatic variation: The case of service encounters from a modified variational pragmatics perspective. In J. César Félix-Brasdefer & Maria Elena Placencia (eds.), Pragmatic variation in service encounter interactions across the Spanish-speaking world, 251–262. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P. & Anne Barron (eds.). 2008. Variational pragmatics: A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schüpbach, Doris. 2015. German or Swiss? Address and other routinised formulas in German-speaking Switzerland. In John Hajek & Yvette Slaughter (eds.), Challenging the monolingual mindset, 63–77. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schüpbach, Doris, John Hajek, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher & Catrin Norrby. 2021. Approaches to the study of address in pluricentric languages: methodological reflections. Sociolinguistica 35. 165–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Xue, Anna Mauranen & Lei Lei. 2020. Syntactic complexity in English as a lingua franca academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 43.100798. DOI logoGoogle Scholar