Part of
It's different with you: Contrastive perspectives on address research
Edited by Nicole Baumgarten and Roel Vismans
[Topics in Address Research 5] 2023
► pp. 397422
Aalberse, Suzanne
2004Waer bestu bleven? Verdwijning van het pronomen du in een vergelijkend perspectief. Nederlandse Taalkunde 9.3. 231–252.Google Scholar
2009Inflectional economy and politeness: morphology-internal and morphology-external factors in the loss of second person marking in Dutch. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Alberdi-Larizgoitia, Xabier
2018Forms of address in Basque. Pragmatics: quarterly journal of the International Pragmatics Association 28.3. 303–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, Friederike
(1988) Terms of Address. Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York & Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, Friederike, Armin Kohz & Klaus Schubert
1986Anredeforschung: Kommentierte Bibliographie zur Soziolinguistik der Anrede. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger & Marguerite Ford
1961Address in American English. Journal of abnormal and social psychology 62. 375–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman
1960 [1972]The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.), Language and social context, 252–282. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
1989Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18. 159–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
1978Universals of language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Esther N. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness, 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
1987Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burt, Susan Meredith
2019Person-referring expressions, reference nominals, and address nominals. Informalization in an Illinois neighborhood social group. In Bettina Kluge & María Irene Moyna (eds.), It’s not all about you. New perspectives on address research, 397–413. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby & Jane Warren
2009Language and human relations. Styles of address in contemporary language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Haruko M.
2006Japanese politeness as an interactional achievement: Academic consultation sessions in Japanese universities. Multilingua 25. 269–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Manuela
2014Beyond T and V – Theoretical reflections on the analysis of forms of address. American Journal of Linguistics. 3.1. 17–26.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2010Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 3232–3245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Oliveira, Sandie Michelle
2013Address in computer-mediated communication. In: Susan Herring et al. (eds.), Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, 291–313. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino
2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1972Sociolinguistic rules of address. In John B. Pride & Janet Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics, 225–240. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan, Jiansheng Guo & Martin Lampert
1990Politeness and persuasion in children’s control acts. Journal of Pragmatics 14.2. 307–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce & William Nolen
1981The association of deference with linguistic form. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27. 93–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilman, Albert & Roger Brown
1958Who says “tu” to whom? ETC: A Review of General Semantics 15.3. 169–174.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1972Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behaviour. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
1981Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole and John L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol, 3. Speech Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael & Jonathan Culpeper
2018Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Cornelia Ilie & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Pragmatics and its Interfaces, 213–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helmbrecht, Johannes
2003Politeness distinctions in second person pronouns. In Friedrich Lenz (ed.) Deictic Conceptualisation of Space, Time and Person, 185–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
1993Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hwang, Juck-Ryoon
1990“Deference versus “Politeness” in Korean Speech. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 82. 41–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sakido
1988Introduction. Multilingua 7.4. 371–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of linguistic politeness. Multilingua 8.2–3. 223–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel & Michael Haugh
2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, Gabrielle
1990Linguistic politeness: current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics 14.2. 193–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
1992Les Interactions Verbales. Vol 2. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
1997A multilevel approach in the study of talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association 7.1. 1–20.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2010aS’adresser à autrui. Les formes nominales d’adresse en français. Chambéry: Université de Savoie.Google Scholar
2010bThe case for an eclectic approach to discourse-in-interaction. In Jürgen Streeck (ed.), New Adventures in language and interaction, 71–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2014S’adresser à autrui: Les formes nominales d’adresse dans une perspective comparative interculturelle. Chambéry: Université de Savoie.Google Scholar
Kluge, Bettina & María Irene Moyna
(eds.) 2019It’s not all about you. New perspectives on address research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona
2018Address inversion in Swahili: Usage patterns, cognitive motivation and cultural factors. Cognitive Linguistics 29.3. 545–583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach
1973The logic of politeness; or, minding your p’s and q’s. In Claudia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds.), Papers from the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 292–305. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
2005aCivility and its discontents. In Robin T. Lakoff & Sachiko Ide (eds.), Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness, 23–43. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005bThe politics of nice. Journal of Politeness Research 1(2). 173–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2014The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
1989Politeness and conversational universals – observations from Japanese’. Multilingua 8.2–3. 207–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter & Rom Harré
1990Pronouns and People. The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Neveu, Franck
2003Grammaires de l’adresse. Aspects de la discontinuité syntaxique. Cahiers de praxématique 40. 27–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2019Im/politeness between the analyst and participant perspectives: An overview of the field. In Eva Ogiermann & Pilar Garces-Conejos Blitvich (eds.), From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness: Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives, 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Richard W.
1980Review of Esther Goody, ed., Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. RELC Journal 11.2. 100–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John
1969Speech Acts. An Essay on the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in society 5, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2005Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 1. 237–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 45–74. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ton, Thoai N. L.
2019A literature of address studies from pragmatic and sociolinguistic perspectives. In Bettina Kluge & María Irene Moyna (eds.), It’s not all about you. New perspectives on address research, 23–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vismans, Roel
2015Negotiating address in a pluricentric language: Dutch/Flemish. In Catrin Norrby & Camilla Wide (eds.), Address practice as social action. European perspectives, 13–32. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Jojoën tussen u en je. Over de dynamiek van het gebruik van Nederlandse aanspreekvormen in het radioprogramma Casa Luna. Internationale neerlandistiek 54.2. 117–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Address negotiations in Dutch emails. In Bettina Kluge & María Irene Moyna (eds.), It’s not all about you. New perspectives on address research, 253–279. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard
1989Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behavior. Multilingua 8. 2–3. 131–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In Richard J. Watts, Sakido Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in Language, 43–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
2016Terms of Address in European Languages: A Study in Cross-Linguistic Semantics and Pragmatics. In Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone & Istvan Kecskes (Eds.), Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, 209–238. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology 9. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar