Cover not available
Article published In:
Target
Vol. 12:1 (2000) ► pp.83–107

Thwarted Expectations

Investigating Translational Mishaps with Reference to Cultural Disparities

| University of Helsinki
While there are many types of purely linguistic differences between languages which students of translation can be explicitly taught to recognise during their formal training, it is a far bigger task to try to make future translators detect and appropriately cater to relevant cultural differences between a source text and its intended target text. Yet, snags of a cultural character are just as detrimental to translation quality as are linguistic mistakes. The problem with cultural differences between source and target environments in translation is further aggravated by the fact that, in contrast with the finite number of linguistic differences between language systems, the range of variation in differences between cultural environments is virtually infinite.
Article outline
  • 1.Culture, Actions, and Norms
  • 2.Language and Culture
  • 3.Examining the Relationships between Translation and Culture: A Case Study
  • 4.Concluding Remarks
    • 4.1.Why Are Cultural Norms Hard to Learn?
    • 4.2.Why Does Culture Matter to Translation?
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 September 2000
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.12.1.05hie
References (27)
References
Bartsch, Renate. 1987. Norms of Language: Theoretical and Practical Aspects. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Campbell, Stuart. 1998. Translation into the Second Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1944. An Essay on Man. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. [Yale paperbound edition: 1962.]Google Scholar
Catford, J.C. 1965. A Linguistic Theory of Translation: An Essay in Applied Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew. 1993. “From ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’: Laws, Norms and Strategies in Translation Studies”. Target 5:1. 21–41.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. and Stephen C. Levinson, eds. 1996. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil. 1997. Communication Across Cultures. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil and Ian Mason. 1997. The Translator as Communicator. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hewson, Lance and Jacky Martin. 1991. Redefining Translation: The Variational Approach. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hietaranta, Pertti. 1999. “Politeness in Translation: Some Cultural Aspects”. Alberto Álvarez Lugrís and Anxo Fernández Ocampo, eds. Anovar/anosar: estudios de traducción e interpretación I1. Vigo: Servicio de Publicacións da Universidade de Vigo, 1999. 219–230.Google Scholar
Leppihalme, Ritva. 1997. Culture Bumps: An Empirical Approach to the Translation of Allusions. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nord, Christiane. 1997. Translating as a Purposeful Activity: Functionalist Approaches Explained. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1996. “Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity”. Gumperz and Levinson 1996 : 407–437.Google Scholar
Oittinen, Riitta and Jukka-Pekka Varonen, eds. 1995. Aspectus varii translationis. Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. 1989. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. 1994. OED2 on CD-ROM. Version 1.11. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Programme of the Government of Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen. 1995. Available in English only on the internet at [URL].Google Scholar
Pääministeri Paavo Lipposen hallituksen ohjelma [Programme of the Government of Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen]. 1995. Helsinki: Painatuskeskus. Also available on the internet at [URL].Google Scholar
Perez-Pena, Richard. 1998. “In Some Big US Cities, Pedestrians see the Light: On the ‘Culture’ of Jaywalking”. Khaleej Times, “Features Plus” section, 14 April 1998, p. 2.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1978. A Grammar of Contemporary English. Seventh impression (corrected). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. Paperback edition [n.d.]. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron and Suzanne Wong Scollon. 1995. Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford (UK) and Cambridge (USA): Blackwell.Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinay, Jean-Paul and Jean Darbelnet. 1958/1995. Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais: Méthode de traduction. Paris: Didier, 1958. Translated into English by Juan C. Sager and M.-J. Hamel as Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1995.Google Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1963. Norm and Action. London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Vuorinen, Erkka. 1995. “Source Text Status and (News) Translation”. Oittinen and Varonen 1995 : 89–102.Google Scholar
Webster’s. 1996. The New International Webster’s Comprehensive Dictionary of the English Language. Deluxe Encyclopedic Edition. Naples, Florida: Trident Press International.Google Scholar