Why Common Ground Is Not Automatically Space for Cooperation: On Chesterman versus Arrojo

Pym, Anthony

doi:10.1075/target.12.2.13pym

Discussion published In:

Target
Vol. 12:2 (2000) ► pp.334–337

Discussion

Why Common Ground Is Not Automatically Space for Cooperation

On Chesterman versus Arrojo

Anthony Pym | Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona

Published online: 4 May 2001

https://doi.org/10.1075/target.12.2.13pym

Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Order by:

Lee, Hyang Marina

2015. Mapping Translation Studies in Korea Using the Holmes Map of Translation Studies. FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 13:1 ► pp. 65 ff.

Dohun Kim

2011. Ellipsis (. . .) and Julimpyo (……): Comparison and Strategies to Translate Ellipsis in English-Korean Translation. English21 24:1 ► pp. 113 ff.

Dohun Kim

2014. Comparison between Korean-English Onomatopoeia and Translation of Korean Onomatopoeia into English. The Journal of Translation Studies 15:1 ► pp. 25 ff.

Arrojo, Rosemary

2002. Lessons learned from Babel. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 14:1 ► pp. 137 ff.

Neubert, Albrecht

2001. Shared ground in Translation Studies: A third series of responses. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 13:2 ► pp. 333 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.