Cover not available
Article published In:
Target
Vol. 30:2 (2018) ► pp.212–239

Interpreter-mediated drafting of written records in police interviews

A case study

| Ghent University
| Independent scholar

Text drafting is an essential component of many of the contexts in which interpreters are called in to ensure communication (Määttä 2015). As Komter (2006) shows, the drafting process itself can be considered a turn in the interaction. Interpreters involved in such contexts thus perform a communicative pas de quatre, crossing not only the language divide, but also the modal divide (oral vs. written). In this paper, we analyse how an interpreter in a Belgian police interview handles this complex task. It appears that she procedurally and declaratively recognises a written turn in the interaction and uses its authoritative voice to silence the witness by sight-translating the turn as it is being typed on the screen. In line with previous research on interpreters’ handling of dialogues (Hale 1997), the interpreter also shapes turns, including the written turn, to the needs of the addressees: upgrading the register properties of the interviewee’s talk and downgrading those of the written turn.

Keywords: dialogue interpreting, written turn, police interview
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Written records in police interviews
  • 3.Research questions
  • 4.Data of the case at hand
    • 4.1Preliminary note on the transcriptions
    • 4.2Interview data and interaction patterns
    • 4.3Primary speakers’ linguistic skills
    • 4.4Interviewee’s awareness of procedures
    • 4.5The interpreter
    • 4.6Position of the participants and the researcher
  • 5.A written turn in the interpreter-mediated police interview?
    • 5.1Turn-taking
    • 5.2Interpreting input
    • 5.3Information gathering
    • 5.4Register alignment of interviewee’s turns with the written turns
    • 5.5Properties of the written turn and their rendering by the interpreter
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.16141.def
References
Agrifoglio, Marjorie
2004 “Sight Translation and Interpreting: A Comparative Analysis of Constraints and Failures.” Interpreting 6 (1): 43–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angermeyer, Peter
2009 “Translation Style and Participant Roles in Court Interpreting.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 13 (1): 3–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
1990 Le français parlé. Études grammaticales. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2001 “Investigating Narrative Inequality: African Asylum Seekers’ Stories in Belgium.” Discourse and Society 12 (4): 413–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina
2000 “Towards Understanding Practices of Medical Interpreting: Interpreter’s Involvement in History Taking.” Discourse Studies 2 (4): 287–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delaere, Isabel
2015 Do Translations Walk the Line? Visually Exploring Translated and Non-Translated Texts in Search of Norm Conformity. PhD diss. Ghent University.Google Scholar
Gallez, Emanuelle, and Katrijn Maryns
2014 “Orality and Authenticity in an Interpreter-Mediated Defendant’s Examination. A Case Study from the Belgian Assize Court.” Interpreting 16 (1): 49–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Sandra
1997 “The Treatment of Register Variation in Court Interpreting.” The Translator 3 (1): 39–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by Gene Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jönsson, Linda, and Per Linell
1991 “Story Generations: From Dialogical Interviews to Written Reports in Police Interrogations.” Text 11 (3): 419–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Komter, Martha
2006 “From Talk to Text: The Interactional Construction of a Police Record.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 39 (3): 201–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Määttä, Simo K.
2015 “Interpreting the Discourse of Reporting: The Case of Screening Interviews with Asylum Seekers and Police Interviews in Finland.” The International Journal for Translation and Interpreting 7 (3): 21–34.Google Scholar
Maryns, Katrijn, and Jan Blommaert
2002 “Pretextuality and Pretextual Gaps: On De/refining Linguistic Inequality.” Pragmatics 12 (1): 11–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakane, Ikuko
2014 Interpreter-Mediated Police Interviews. A Discourse-Pragmatic Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Anne Birgitta, and May-Britt Monsrud
2015 “Reading Skills for Sight Translation in Public Services.” Translation and Interpreting. The International Journal for Translation and Interpreting Research 7 (3): 10–20Google Scholar
Pesquié, Brigitte
2002 “The Belgian System.” In European Criminal Procedures, edited by Mireille Delmas-Marty and John R. Spencer, 81–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pöchhacker, Franz
2004 Introducing Interpreting Studies. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pöchacker, Franz, and Waltraud Kolb
2009 “Interpreting for the Record. A Case Study of Asylum Review Hearings.” In The Critical Link 5: Quality in Interpreting – A Shared Responsibility, edited by Sandra Beatriz Hale, Uldis Ozolins and Ludmila Stern, 199–134. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pöllabauer, Sonja
2004 “Interpreting in Asylum Hearings. Issues of Role, Responsibility and Power.” Interpreting 6 (2): 143–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smets, Lotte, and Paul Ponsaers
2011 “Het proces-verbaal van een verdachtenverhoor: een bron van informatie? Diverse formats van geschreven communicatie tussen politie en parket.” Cahiers Politiestudies 4 (21): 123–144.Google Scholar
Song, Zhongwei
2010 “Skill Transfer from Sight Translation to Simultaneous Interpreting: A Case Study of an Effective Teaching Technique.” International Journal of Interpreter Education 21: 120–134.Google Scholar
van Charldorp, Tessa
2011 “The Coordination of Talk and Typing in Police Interrogations.” Crossroads of Language, Interaction and Culture 8 (1): 61–92.Google Scholar
2014 “ ‘What Happened?’ From Talk to Text in Police Interrogations.” Language and Communication 361: 7–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wadensjö, Cecilia
1998 Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Defrancq, Bart & Sofie Verliefde
2023. A Dutch discourse marker in interpreter-mediated police interviewing with drafting: A corpus-based approach to dialogue interpreting. Research in Corpus Linguistics 11:2 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Havnen, Randi
2022. Fight for focus: attention and agency in sight-translated interaction. Perspectives 30:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Määttä, Simo & Tuija Kinnunen
2024. The interplay between linguistic and non-verbal communication in an interpreter-mediated main hearing of a victim’s testimony. Multilingua 0:0 DOI logo
Määttä, Simo K, Eeva Puumala & Riitta Ylikomi
2021. Linguistic, psychological and epistemic vulnerability in asylum procedures: An interdisciplinary approach. Discourse Studies 23:1 ► pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Vandenbroucke, Mieke & Bart Defrancq
2021. Professionally unaligned interpreting in Belgian marriage fraud investigations and its consequences. The Translator 27:1 ► pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
Verliefde, Sofie & Bart Defrancq
2023. Interpreter-mediated access to the written record in police interviews. Perspectives 31:3 ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.