Cover not available
Article published In:
Target
Vol. 31:3 (2019) ► pp.465–499

(Re)manufacturing consent in English

A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of government interpreters’ mediation of China’s discourse on PEOPLE at televised political press conferences

ORCID logo | University of Liverpool

Unlike the use of force or coercion, the articulation of ideological discourse constitutes a softer approach in the legitimation and hegemonic rule of dominant political actors, achieved through manufacturing consent (Gramsci 1971). As a major site of ideology, the televised premier’s press conferences in China represent such a discursive event, enabling the Chinese government to convey its discursive formations or “regime of truth” (Foucault 1984) and in doing so to manufacture consent. Benefitting from a corpus containing 20 years of China’s Premier-Meets-the-Press conference data (1998–2017), this corpus-based critical discourse analysis (CDA) study explores the government-affiliated interpreters’ mediation and (re)construction of China’s discourse on PEOPLE. The interpreters are found to reinforce China’s discourse on PEOPLE (e.g., increased mentions of PEOPLE-related items) and (re)construct a more positive image of Beijing being people-oriented and concerned with its people in English (e.g., the repeated employment of ‘our people’). An examination of the collocational patterns relating to the item ‘people’ (e.g., people’s, of/to/for/by*people) (re)presented in the English discourse sheds light on the government‒people ties in China. This article highlights the government interpreters’ vital agency role in image (re)construction and in contributing to the government’s political legitimation and hegemonic rule, particularly given the increasingly mediat(is)ed world we live in.

Keywords: manufacturing consent, political legitimation, hegemony, discourse on people, corpus-based CDA, interpreter mediation, political discourse, political press conferences, premier’s press conferences
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Interpreter-mediated political press conferences as an ideological site for manufacturing consent
  • 3.The Chinese government’s discourse on PEOPLE, legitimacy and hegemonic rule
  • 4.Corpus-based critical discourse analysis: A “useful methodological synergy”
  • 5.CE–PolitDisCorp corpus data and procedures for data analysis
  • 6.Data analysis: Interpreters’ (re)manufacture of consent in mediating China’s discourse on PEOPLE
    • 6.1Interpreters’ overall (re)construction of PEOPLE-related items
    • 6.2Interpreters’ gravitation towards and concentrated production of the lexical item ‘people’
      • 6.2.1Interpreters’ additions of ‘people’ untriggered by explicit markers in the ST
      • 6.2.2Interpreters’ additions of ‘people’ to avoid items with negative connotations in the TT
      • 6.2.3Interpreters’ additions of ‘people’ in place of items with specialised and culture-specific meanings
    • 6.3The collocational patterns related to the item ‘people’
      • 6.3.1‘our people’
      • 6.3.2‘Of * people’
      • 6.3.3‘To/for * people’
      • 6.3.4‘by * people’
      • 6.3.5‘people’s’
  • 7.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.18023.gu
References
Alexander, Marc, and Mark Davies
2015 Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. Available from [URL]
Althusser, Louis
1971 Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Delhi: Aakar.Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence
2014 AntConc (Version 3.4.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Baker, Paul
2010 “Representations of Islam in British Broadsheet and Tabloid Newspapers 1999–2005.” Language and Politics 9 (2): 310–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michał Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, and Erez Levon
2015 “Picking the Right Cherries? A Comparison of Corpus-Based and Qualitative Analyses of News Articles about Masculinity.” Discourse and Communication 9 (2): 221–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaton, Morven
2007 “Interpreted Ideologies in Institutional Discourse: The Case of the European Parliament.” The Translator 13 (2): 271–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butsch, Richard, and Sonia Livingstone
eds. 2014 Meanings of Audiences: Comparative Discourses. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie
2013 “Re-mediation, Inter-mediation, Trans-mediation: The Cosmopolitan Trajectories of Convergent Journalism.” Journalism Studies 14 (2): 267–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du, Xujia, and Johanna Rendle-Short
2016 “Journalist Questions: Comparing Adversarialness in Chinese Political Press Conferences.” Discourse, Context and Media 121: 51–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Terry
1991 Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989 Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Firth, John
1957 Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John
2004 “Identity Politics and Hong Kong’s Return to Chinese Sovereignty: Analysing the Discourse of Hong Kong’s First Chief Executive.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (9): 1551–1578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel
1984 “Truth and Power.” In The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault’s Thought, edited by Paul Rabinow, 51–75. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gow, Michael
2012 Professing Hegemony: Academia and the State Vision for Higher Education in 21st Century China. PhD diss. University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio
1971 Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Gu, Chonglong
2018 “Forging a Glorious Past via the ‘Present Perfect’: A Corpus-Based CDA Analysis of China’s Past Accomplishments Discourse Mediat(is)ed at China’s Interpreted Political Press Conferences.” Discourse, Context and Media 241: 137–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019a “Mediating ‘Face’ in Triadic Political Communication: A CDA Analysis of Press Conference Interpreters’ Discursive (Re)construction of Chinese Government’s Image (1998–2017).” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (2): 201–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardt-Mautner, Gerlinde
1995 “ ‘Only Connect.’ Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics.” UCREL Technical Papers 6. Lancaster: University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil, and Ian Mason
1990 Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Herman, Edward, and Noam Chomsky
1994 Manufacturing Consent. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Kang, Ji-Hae
2007 “Recontextualization of News Discourse: A Case Study of Translation of News Discourse on North Korea.” The Translator 13 (2): 219–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Kyung Hye
2013 Mediating American and South Korean News Discourses about North Korea through Translation: A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis. PhD diss. University of Manchester.Google Scholar
2017 “Newsweek Discourses on China and Their Korean Translations: A Corpus-Based Approach.” Discourse, Context & Media 151: 34–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavagnino, Alessandra C.
2017 “From ‘Chinese Characteristics’ (Zhongguo Tese中国特色) to ‘Chinese Dream’ (Zhongguo Meng中国梦) – The Chinese Political Discourse Today.” In Understanding China Today: An Exploration of Politics, Economics, Society, and International Relations, edited by Silvio Beretta, Axel Berkofsky, and Lihong Zhang, 275–287. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Tao
2016 Re-shaping Appraisal Stance towards Self and Others in Chinese-English Translation of Political Discourse: A Corpus-Based Discourse Analysis Approach. PhD diss. Shanghai Jiao Tong University.Google Scholar
Li, Xin, and Hu Kaibao
2013 “A Corpus-Based Study of Modal Verbs in Chinese-English Government Press Conference Interpretation.” Computer-Assisted Foreign Language Education in China 31: 26–32.Google Scholar
Liu, Yongbing
2005 “The Construction of Cultural Values and Beliefs in Chinese Language Textbooks: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 26 (1): 15–30.Google Scholar
Mao, Zedong
1957 On the Correct Handling of Contradictions among the People [Speech at the Eleventh Session (Enlarged) of the Supreme State Conference].
Mason, Katherine
2016 Infectious Change: Reinventing Chinese Public Health after an Epidemic. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulderrig, Jane
2012 “The Hegemony of Inclusion: A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Deixis in Education Policy.” Discourse and Society 23 (6): 701–728. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munday, Jeremy
2007 “Translation and Ideology: A Textual Approach.” The Translator 13 (2): 195–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Evaluation in Translation: Critical Points of Translator Decision-Making. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Feng, and Binghan Zheng
2017 “Gender Difference of Hedging in Interpreting for Chinese Government Press Conferences: A Corpus-Based Study.” Across Languages and Cultures 18 (2): 171–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
2004 “Corpora and Discourse: A Most Congruous Beast.” In Corpora and Discourse, edited by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, 11–20. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Shambaugh, David
ed. 2016 The China Reader: Rising Power. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shlesinger, Miriam
1998 “Corpus-Based Interpreting Studies as an Offshoot of Corpus-Based Translation Studies.” Meta 43 (4): 486–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tang, Liang
2017 China’s Authoritarian Path to Development: Is Democratization Possible? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition)
2007 Distributed by Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford, on behalf of the BNC Consortium. [URL]
van Dijk, Teun A.
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wang, Binhua
2012 “A Descriptive Study of Norms in Interpreting: Based on the Chinese-English Consecutive Interpreting Corpus of Chinese Premier Press Conferences.” Meta 57 (1): 198–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Binhua, and Dezheng Feng
2018 “A Corpus-Based Study of Stance-Taking as Seen from Critical Points in Interpreted Political Discourse.” Perspectives 26 (2): 246–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Jiayu
2017 “Representations of the Chinese Communist Party’s Political Ideologies in President Xi Jinping’s Discourse.” Discourse & Society 28 (4): 413–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Ningkang
2012 Behind the Laughter: Mediating Hegemony through Humour. MSc diss. London School of Economics and Political Sciences.Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G.
1995 “Discourse Analysis: A Critical Review.” Language and Literature 4 (3): 157–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2001 “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 63–95. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wright, Teresa
2015 Party and State in Post-Mao China. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Xing, Guoxin
2009 “Hu Jintao’s Political Thinking and Legitimacy Building: A Post-Marxist Perspective.” Asian Affairs: An American Review 36 (4): 213–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yi, Yan
2016a “The Structural Evolution of the Chinese Premier’s Press Conference: A Study in Institutionalization.” Asian Journal of Communication 26 (3): 223–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b “Information Control and Political Impression Management: A Dramaturgical Analysis of the Chinese Premier’s Press Conference.” International Journal of Communication 101: 5473–5493.Google Scholar
Zhang, Meifang
2013 “Stance and Mediation in Transediting News Headlines as Paratexts.” Perspectives 21 (3): 396–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Shanruo Ning
2015 Confucianism in Contemporary Chinese Politics: An Actionable Account of Authoritarian Political Culture. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Zhang, Xiaoling
2011 The Transformation of Political Communication in China: From Propaganda to Hegemony. Singapore: World Scientific Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Dingxin
2009 “The Mandate of Heaven and Performance Legitimation in Historical and Contemporary China.” The American Behavioral Scientist 53 (3): 416–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Lian
2012 “The Debates in Contemporary Chinese Political Thought.” In Contemporary Chinese Political Thought: Debates and Perspectives, edited by Fred R. Dallmayr and Tingyang Zhao, 26–45. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Zhu, Yuchao
2011 “Performance Legitimacy and China’s Political Adaptation Strategy.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 16 (2): 123–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Gloria, Enrico V.
2021. Justifying economic coercion: the discourse of victimhood in China’s unilateral sanctions policy. The Pacific Review ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gu, Chonglong & Rebecca Tipton
2020. (Re-)voicing Beijing’s discourse through self-referentiality: a corpus-based CDA analysis of government interpreters’ discursive mediation at China’s political press conferences (1998–2017). Perspectives 28:3 ► pp. 406 ff. DOI logo
Li, Tao & Kaibao Hu
2021. Corpus-Based Translation Studies and Political Discourse Analysis. In Reappraising Self and Others [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 6], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Matsushita, Kayo
2021. Diverging narratives: exploring the hidden influence of transquoting in framing the journalistic portrayal of Shiori Ito. Language and Intercultural Communication 21:3 ► pp. 366 ff. DOI logo
Valdeón, Roberto A.
2020. Journalistic translation research goes global: theoretical and methodological considerations five years on. Perspectives 28:3 ► pp. 325 ff. DOI logo
Zanettin, Federico
2021. News Media Translation, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 february 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.