Cover not available
Article published In:
Target
Vol. 19:1 (2007) ► pp.45–68

Foreign names into native tongues

How to transfer sound between languages – transliteration, phonological translation, nativization, and implications for translation theory

| San Francisco State University
The transfer of sound from one language into another is not a uniform process, but rather, takes different forms depending on the orthographies and phonological properties of source and target languages, the less common of which involve processes significantly different from transliteration between European phonetic scripts. This paper pools techniques commonly used in loanword phonology and second language acquisition to illustrate complications that arise when translating names from English into languages such as Japanese and Chinese, which differ significantly from the source language in syllable structure and orthographic convention. Competing strategies of adaptation and accommodation are placed in the context of lexical retrieval and compared with experimental studies of nativization in interlanguage. It will be shown that for names to be perceived as similar-sounding across language boundaries, it would be desirable to look beyond segmental equivalence and consider stress, syllable count and other suprasegmental factors that play a greater role in phonological memory.
Keywords: transliteration, phonological translation, adaptation, accommodation, nativization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Transliteration processes
    • 2.1Spanish to English
    • 2.2English to Polish
    • 2.3English to Japanese
    • 2.4English to (Mandarin) Chinese
  • 3.Experiments
    • 3.1. Lin (2003)—Speakers’ perspective
    • 3.2The present study—Listeners’ perspective
      • 3.2.1Experiment 1: Back translation
      • 3.2.2Experiment 2: Similarity ratings
    • 3.3Discussion
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 August 2007
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.19.1.04li
References (19)
References
Abrahamsson, Niclas. 2001. “Acquiring L2 syllable margins—Studies on the simplification of onsets and codas in interlanguage phonology”. Stockholm University. [Ph.D. dissertation.]Google Scholar
. 2003. “Development and recoverability of L2 codas: A longitudinal study of Chinese/Swedish interphonology”. Studies in second language acquisition 25:3. 313–349.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, Jean. 2003. Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon, third edition. Oxford: Blackwell. (first edition 1987.)Google Scholar
Aitchison, Jean and Miron L. Straf. 1981. “Lexical storage and retrieval: A developing skill”. Linguistics 191. 751–795.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, Jean and Shula Chiat. 1981. “Natural phonology or natural memory?: The interaction between phonological processes and recall mechanisms”. Language and speech 24:4. 311–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mona. 1992. In other words: A coursebook on translation. London-New York: Routledge.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. 1978. “Tip of the tongue and slip of the ear: Implications for language processing”. UCLA working papers in phonetics 421.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger and David McNeill. 1966. “The ‘tip of the tongue’ phenomenon”. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior 51. 325–337.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catford, John. 1965. A linguistic theory of translation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Ta Tsung. 1983. The principles and techniques of translation. Taipei: Kuo Chia Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Gutknecht, Christoph and Lutz Rölle. 1996. Translating by factors. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, Graeme and David St-Onge. 1997. “Lexical chains as representations of context for the detection and correction of malapropisms”. Christiane Fellbaum, ed. Wordnet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997. 305–332.Google Scholar
Lin, Yuh-Huey. 2001. “Syllable simplification strategies—A stylistic perspective”. Language learning 51:4. 681–718.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Interphonology variability: Sociolinguistic factors affecting L2 simplification strategies”. Applied linguistics 24:4. 439–464.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munday, Jeremy. 2001. Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and applications. London-New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Newmark, Peter. 1981. Approaches to translation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A. 1964. Towards a science of translating: With special reference to principles and procedures involved in Bible translating. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Riney, Timothy J.. 1990. “Age and open syllable preference in interlanguage phonology”. Hartmut Burmeister and Patricia L. Rounds, eds. Variability in second language acquisition: Proceedings of the 10th meeting of the Second Language Research Forum, Vol. II1. Eugene: University of Oregon, 1990. 196–216.Google Scholar
Smith, Veronica and Christine Klein-Braley. 1985. In other words. München: Max Hueber Verlag.Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Vista, Alvin
2022. The Role of Test, Classroom, and Home Language Correspondence in Cross-Lingual Testing. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 31:6 ► pp. 711 ff. DOI logo
Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M.
2020. Translation/Interpreting Learning and Teaching Practices Research. In Translator and Interpreter Education Research [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Mustafin, Ilgiz, Marius-Cristian Frunza & JooYoung Lee
2020. Multilingual Entity Matching. In Advanced Information Networking and Applications [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 926], ► pp. 810 ff. DOI logo
Muñoz-Basols, Javier
2019. Going beyond the comfort zone: multilingualism, translation and mediation to foster plurilingual competence. Language, Culture and Curriculum 32:3 ► pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Mustafin, Ilgiz, Marius Frunza & Jooyoung Lee
2018. Multilingual Entity Matching. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Mossop, Brian
2017. Invariance orientation: Identifying an object for translation studies. Translation Studies 10:3 ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Mossop, Brian
2017. When translation is not about meaning. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 63:5 ► pp. 621 ff. DOI logo
Mossop, Brian
2019. ‘Intersemiotic translating’. Translation and Interpreting Studies 14:1 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.