Cover not available
Article published In:
Translaboration: Exploring Collaboration in Translation and Translation in Collaboration
Edited by Alexa Alfer and Cornelia Zwischenberger
[Target 32:2] 2020
► pp. 282–306

Creativity in collaborative poetry translating

ORCID logo | University of León
 | Newcastle University
This study examines how creative solutions to translation problems are negotiated and selected in ‘poettrios’ (teams consisting of a source poet, a target-language poet and a bilingual language mediator working from pre-prepared, literal translation drafts of poems), and compares creativity in this mode to that in solo poetry translating (Jones 2011). The interactions and outputs taken from real-time recordings, work-in-progress drafts and participant interviews from several poettrios translating original poems from English into Dutch and from Dutch into English in two workshops were coded and analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. The results show that creativity in poetry translating is an eminently cognitive activity in which creative solutions typically emerge through the incremental contributions of the complementary expertises of the individual poettrio members, with occasional radical leaps. In this incremental scaffolding process, and similarly to solo translating, poettrios first consider non-creative options, then creative adjustments and, finally, creative transformations. Radical solutions are generally only accepted when a departure from the source-text surface meaning is deemed necessary to achieve the double aim of retaining the source poem’s message while producing an acceptable poem in the target culture (Holmes 1988).
Keywords: poetry, creativity, translation processes, translation strategies
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Creativity
    • 2.2Collaborative creativity
  • 3.Methods and example sequences
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Time and priorities
    • 4.2Topics
    • 4.3Processes and interactions
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Poettrios and solo translators
    • 5.2Creative processes
    • 5.3Poettrios and roles
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 7 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.20087.lob
References (35)
References
Acar, Selcuk, Cyndi Burnett, and John F. Cabra. 2017. “Ingredients of Creativity: Originality and More.” Creativity Research Journal 29 (2): 133–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alfer, Alexa. 2017. “Entering the Translab: Translation as Collaboration, Collaboration as Translation, and the Third Space of ‘Translaboration’.” In Translaboration, edited by Alexa Alfer, special issue of Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 3 (3): 275–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beylard-Ozeroff, Ann, Jana Králová, and Barbara Moser-Mercer. 1998. “Introduction.” In Translators’ Strategies and Creativity, edited by Ann Beylard-Ozeroff, Jana Králová, and Barbara Moser-Mercer, xi–xiii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew. 1997. Memes of Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cranfield, Steven, and Claudio Tedesco. 2017. “Reformulating the Problem of Translatability: A Case of Literary Translaboration with the Poetry of Francisco Brines.” In Translaboration, edited by Alexa Alfer, special issue of Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 3 (3): 304–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryden, John. 1680/2006. “From Preface to Ovid’s Epistles.” In Translation – Theory and Practice: A Historical Reader, edited by Daniel Weissbort and Astradur Eysteinsson, 145–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fontanet, Mathilde. 2005. “Temps de créativité en traduction.” Meta 50 (2): 432–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilson, Lucy L., and Nora Madjar. 2011. “Radical and Incremental Creativity: Antecedents and Processes.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 5 (1): 21–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Barbara. 1989. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Heiden, Tanja. 2005. “Blick in die Black Box: Kreative Momente im Übersetzungsprozess: Eine experimentelle Studie mit Translog.” Meta 50 (2): 448–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, James S. 1988. Translated! Papers on Literary Translation and Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Hughes, Ted. 1989. “Postscript to János Csokits’ Note.” In Translating Poetry: The Double Labyrinth, edited by Daniel Weissbort, 16–34. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaussi, Kimberly S., Alexander R. Knights, and Alka Gupta. 2017. “Feeling Good, Being Intentional, and Their Relationship to Two Types of Creativity at Work.” Creativity Research Journal 29 (4): 377–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Francis R. 2011. Poetry Translating as Expert Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones-Teuben, Hanneke Maria. 2013. ‘I Disagree with Myself!’: Creative Thinking in a Key Stage 1 Community of Enquiry. PhD diss. Newcastle University.Google Scholar
Keeley, Edmund. 2000. On Translation: Reflections and Conversations. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
Kunitz, Stanley, and Daniel Weissbort. 1989. “Translating Anna Akhmatova: A Conversation with Stanley Kunitz.” In Translating Poetry: The Double Labyrinth, edited by Daniel Weissbort, 107–124. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moran, Seana, and Vera John-Steiner. 2004. “How Collaboration in Creative Work Impacts Identity and Motivation.” In Collaborative Creativity: Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Dorothy Miell and Karen Littleton, 11–25. London: Free Association.Google Scholar
Nord, Christiane. 2001. “Loyalty Revisited: Bible Translation as a Case in Point.” In The Return to Ethics, edited by Anthony Pym, special issue of The Translator 7 (2): 185–202.Google Scholar
NVivo. 2019. NVivo Version 12 Pro. Chadstone, Victoria: QSR International.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Sharon. 2011. “Collaborative Translation.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, Volume 21, edited by Yves Gambier and Luc Van Doorslaer, 17–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paterson, Don. 2006. Orpheus: A Version of Rainer Maria Rilke. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Raffel, Burton. 1988. The Art of Translating Poetry. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Fiona. 2012. “Creative Translation.” In The Cambridge Companion to Creative Writing, edited by David Morley and Philip Nielsen, 118–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, Keith. 2007. Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schwimmer, Marina. 2017. “Beyond Theory and Practice: Towards an Ethics of Translation.” Ethics and Education 12 (1): 51–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, Rosalind H. 2004. “Creativity and Innovation in Teams.” In Collaborative Creativity: Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Dorothy Miell and Karen Littleton, 175–188. London: Free Association.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Robert J., and Todd I. Lubart. 1999. “The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms.” In Handbook of Creativity, edited by Robert J. Sternberg, 3–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter. 2002. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wallas, Graham. 1926/2014. The Art of Thought. Tunbridge Wells: Solis.Google Scholar
Ward, Thomas B., Steven M. Smith, and Ronald A. Finke. 1999. “Creative Cognition.” In Handbook of Creativity, edited by Robert J. Sternberg, 189–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weissbort, Daniel. 2004. From Russian with Love: Joseph Brodsky in English. London: Anvil.Google Scholar
Wood, David, Jerome S. Brunner, and Gail Ross. 1976. “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving.” Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology 17 (2): 89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yong, Kevyn, Stephen J. Sauer, and Elizabeth A. Mannix. 2014. “Conflict and Creativity in Interdisciplinary Teams.” Small Group Research 45 (3): 266–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwischenberger, Cornelia. 2016. “On Why ‘Translaboration’ is Synonymous with Transdisciplinarity and What This Means for Us.” Paper presented at Translab workshop, University of Westminster, London, September 12.
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Karunanayake, Dinithi & Ruhanie Perera
2023. Memory as Method, Translaboration as Practice. In Translaboration in Analogue and Digital Practice [Transkulturalität – Translation – Transfer, 57], ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Sarıgül, Semih
2023. Online Translaboration in Video Game Localisation. In Translaboration in Analogue and Digital Practice [Transkulturalität – Translation – Transfer, 57], ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Dai, Yun-fang
2021. Power imbalance in translaboration: a perspective from Chinese translation history. Neohelicon 48:2 ► pp. 599 ff. DOI logo
Dai, Yun-fang
2024. Conflict in Translaboration: Contract, Ideology, and Translation Strategy. Translation Review ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.