Cover not available
Article published In:
Target
Vol. 23:2 (2011) ► pp.251–271

Flow in translation

Exploring optimal experience for translation trainees

 | Sheikhbahaee University, Esfahan
 | Washington State University
 | Ferdowsi University Of Mashhad
The study reported here examined the amount and quality of flow experienced by trainee translators while translating different text genres. Flow (Csikszentmihalyi 1975) is an optimal experience, characterized by intense focus, control, interest and skills-challenge balance that leads to enhanced performance on a task. Although investigated in areas such as professional sports, surgery, and music, Flow Theory has not yet been tested in the area of translation. This study aimed at identifying which discourse genre would induce most flow in trainee translators while translating. Fifty-six Iranian English Translation majors studying at the University of Kashan translated three 180-word texts of narrative, expository, and descriptive genres. After each translation, they responded to a Flow Perceptions Questionnaire (Egbert, 2003) in the Likert format to report their perceptions of flow. Using repeated measures ANOVA, the researchers investigated flow differences among genres. The results indicated that flow existed in the translation classroom and that there were significant differences in the flow scores engendered by different genres. To support the findings drawn from the numerical analysis, four participants, selected from the population of subjects from the first phase, were interviewed, and the analysis of the interviews generally corroborated the statistical findings.
Keywords: flow, discourse genre, optimal experience, skills-challenge balance, translation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • The concept of flow
  • The dimensions of flow
    • Skills-challenge Balance
    • Attention
    • Interest
    • Control
  • Flow in translation and in foreign language learning
  • Methodology
    • Participants
  • Instruments
    • Tasks and Texts
    • Flow Perceptions Questionnaire
    • Flow-Dimension-Open-Ended Form
    • Interview
  • Procedure
  • Results and discussion
    • Statistical findings
      • Descriptive Statistics
      • Interpretive Statistics
    • Qualitative findings
  • Conclusions
    • Pedagogical implications
    • Suggestion for future research
  • References
Published online: 22 December 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.23.2.06mir
References (40)
References
Abbott, J. 2000. ““Blinking out” and “having the touch”: Two fifth-grade boys talk about flow experience in writing”. Written Communication 171. 53–92.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abuhamdeh, S. 2000. “The autotelic personality: an exploratory investigation.” Unpublished manuscript. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Asakawa, K. 2004. “Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: how do they experience challenges in daily life?” Journal of Happiness Studies 51. 123–154.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conlin, M. L. 1998. Patterns: a short prose reader. Houghton Mifflin Company: USAGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1975. Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-bass.Google Scholar
1989. “The optimal experience in work and leisure”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 561. 815–822.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
1996. Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
1997a. “Evolution and Flow”. NAMTA Journal 22:2. 118–149.Google Scholar
1997b. “Flow and education”. NAMTA Journal 22:2. 2–35.Google Scholar
1997c. “Flow and evolution”. NAMTA Journal 22:2. 36–58.Google Scholar
1997d. “Flow and creativity”. NAMTA Journal 22:2. 61–97.Google Scholar
2008. “Thoughts about education”. In D. Dickinson (ed.). Creating the future: perspectives on educational change. Retrieved September 12, 2009, from the World Wide Web : [URL]/
Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, I. 1988. Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Nakamura, J. 1999. “Emerging goals and the self-regulation of behavior”. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (ed.). Perspectives on behavioral self-regulation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 107–118.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K. & Whalen, S. 1993. Talented teenagers: the roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Custodero, L. A. 2002. “Seeking challenge, finding skill: Flow experience and music education.” Arts Education Policy Review 103:3. 3–9.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L. 1992. “The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: a self-determination theory perspective.” In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 43–70.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. 1987. “The support of autonomy and the control of behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 531. 1024–1037.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. 2002. “Motivational beliefs, values, and goals.” Annual Review of Psychology 531. 109–32.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J. 2003. “A Study of Flow Theory in the foreign language classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 871. 499–518.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. 1972. Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hektner, J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. “A longitudinal exploration of flow and intrinsic motivation in adolescents”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
Inghilleri, P. 1999. From subjective experience to cultural change. New York: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. A. & Marsh, H. W. 1996. “Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: the flow state scale.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 181. 17–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. & Roberts, G. 1992. “Positive performance states of athletes: Toward a conceptual understanding of peak performance.” The Sport Psychologist, 61, 156–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massimini, F. & Delle Fave, A. 2000. “Individual development in a bio-cultural perspective.” American Psychologist 551. 24–33.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massimini, F., Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Delle Fave, A. 1988. “Flow and biocultural evolution”. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds). Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press. 60–81.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McQuillan, J. & Conde, G. 1996. “The conditions of flow in reading: Two studies of optimal experience.” Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly 171. 109–135.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montena, G. B. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. “The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience.” Journal of Personality 641. 266–310.Google Scholar
Nakamura, J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. 2002. “The concept of flow”. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.). Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 89–105.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R., Boraie, D. & Kassabgy, O. 1996. “Foreign language motivation: internal structure and external connections”. In R. Oxford (ed.). Language learning motivation: Pathways to the new century. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press. 9–56.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. & Savage, W. 1992. “Challenge, skill and motivation.” PASAA 221. 14–28.Google Scholar
Shernoff, D. J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B. & Shernoff, E. S. 2003. “Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of Flow Theory.” School Psychology Quarterly 18:2. 158–176.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thanasoulas, D. 2000. “What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered?” The Internet TESL Journal 6:11. Retrieved August 14, 2009, from the World Wide Web: [URL]
Trevino, L. & Webster, J. 1992. “Flow in computer-mediated communication: Electronic mail and voice ail evaluation and impacts.” Communication Research 191. 539–573.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wanner, B., Ladouceur, R., Auclair, A. V. & Vitaro, F. 2006. “Flow and dissociation: examination of mean levels, cross-links, and links to emotional well-being across sports and recreational and pathological gambling.” Journal of Gambling Studies 22:3. 289–304.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webster, J., Trevino, L. & Ryan, L., 1993. “The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions.” Computers in Human Behavior 91. 411–426.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalen, S. 1997. “Assessing flow experiences in highly able adolescent learners.” Paper resented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Wong, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1991. “Motivation and academic achievement: The effects of personality traits and the quality of experience.” Journal of Personality 59:3. 539–574.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Jia, Fan, Jie Meng, Ying Ma & Yanhui Mao
2024. Flow experience and self-efficacy in undergraduates’ English learning: A weekly diary investigation with cross-lagged panel modeling approach. System 123 ► pp. 103312 ff. DOI logo
Adrienn Károly, Lotta Kokkonen, Maija Gerlander & Peppi Taalas
2024. Driving and Embracing Change: Learning and Teaching Languages and Communication in Higher Education. JYU Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Peifer, Corinna, Gina Wolters, László Harmat, Jean Heutte, Jasmine Tan, Teresa Freire, Dionísia Tavares, Carla Fonte, Frans Orsted Andersen, Jef van den Hout, Milija Šimleša, Linda Pola, Lucia Ceja & Stefano Triberti
2022. A Scoping Review of Flow Research. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Cox, Carolina Benito & Cherice Montgomery
2019. A study of 21st century skills and engagement in a university Spanish foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals 52:4 ► pp. 822 ff. DOI logo
Parhizgar, Zakieh & Peter Liljedahl
2019. Chapter 10: Teaching Modelling Problems and Its Effects on Students’ Engagement and Attitude Toward Mathematics. In Affect in Mathematical Modeling [Advances in Mathematics Education, ], ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Khodadady, Ebrahim & Seyyedeh Mina Hamedi
2017. A Schematic Analysis of Three Genres in the Light of Flow Theory and Optimal Experience. Psychological Studies 62:4 ► pp. 395 ff. DOI logo
Azizi, Zeinab & Behzad Ghonsooly
2015. Exploring Flow Theory in TOEFL Texts: Expository and Argumentative Genre. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 6:1 ► pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
Ghonsooly, Behzad & Seyyedeh Mina Hamedi
2014. An investigation of the most Flow Inducing Genres. International Journal of Research Studies in Education 3:4 DOI logo
Washbourne, Kelly
2014. The self-directed learner: intentionality in translator training and education. Perspectives 22:3 ► pp. 373 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.