Cover not available
Discussion published In:
Target
Vol. 23:2 (2011) ► pp.311–347
Discussion

In defence of polysystem theory

| Lingnan University, Hong Kong
This article revisits Itamar Even-Zohar’s polysystem theory, including its hypotheses on the position of translated literature and its relation with translation norms, and some of its basic assumptions and principles, such as the heterogeneity, dynamics and overlapping of systems, the quest for probabilistic laws, and objectivity and neutrality. Through reading Even-Zohar’s texts closely and tracing the later developments of the theory, it attempts to explore the complexities of the theory, and clear up some misunderstandings, citing examples from polysystem-inspired case studies. It also discusses the complications caused by the expansion made by Gideon Toury on the concept of “adequacy” and “acceptability”, presents a revised version of Even-Zohar’s hypothesis on the situations in which translated literature is likely to occupy a central position, and suggests ways in which polysystem theory can or should be rendered more intricate. It argues that polysystem theory and other cultural theories can be complementary and mutually enriching.
Keywords: polysystem theory, translated literature, norm, weak, adequacy, acceptability, binary opposition, heterogeneity, system, objectivity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The hypothesis on the position of translated literature
    • 2.1Value judgement?
    • 2.2Subjective or objective?
    • 2.3Self-perception—but of what?
    • 2.4Second hypothesis revised
    • 2.5Can polysystem theory explain it?
  • 3.The hypothesis about the behaviour of translated literature, and Toury’s Descriptive Translation Studies
    • 3.1Toury’s redefinition of “adequacy” and “acceptability”
    • 3.2How many axes?
    • 3.3Where are the tools for each phase?
    • 3.4May texts fall outside the axes?
    • 3.5Is position the sole determinant of behaviour?
    • 3.6Does “central” and “adequate” always mean innovative?
    • 3.7Acceptability vs. acceptance
    • 3.8Synonymous with domestication and foreignization?
  • 4.The bigger issues
    • 4.1Binary oppositions?
    • 4.2System vs. agency
    • 4.3Text-bound?
    • 4.4Unable to deal with power and ideology?
    • 4.5A coherent theoretical framework proposed
    • 4.6Objectivity and neutrality
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 December 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.23.2.08cha
References (59)
References
Agorni, Mirella. 2007. “Locating Systems and Individuals in Translation Studies”. Michaela Wolf and Alexandra Fukari, eds. Constructing a Sociology of Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–36.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassnett, Susan. 1998. “The Translation Turn in Cultural Studies”. Susan Bassnett André Lefevere. Constructing Cultures: Essays on Literary Translation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 123–140.Google Scholar
Chang Nam Fung. 1998. “Politics and Poetics in Translation: Accounting for a Chinese Version of ‘Yes Prime Minister‘”. The Translator 4:2. 249–272.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998a. “An Applied Discipline Obsessed with Loyalty—On the Chinese Tradition of Translation Studies” [in Chinese]. Journal of Translation Studies 2. 29–41.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Towards a Macro-polysystem Hypothesis”. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 8:2. 109–123.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Polysystem Theory: Its Prospect As a Framework for Translation Research”. Target 13: 2. 317–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Zhongxi yixue piping (Criticism of Chinese and Western Translation Theories). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. Yes Prime Manipulator: How a Chinese Translation of British Political Humour Came into Being. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “The Concept of Norms in Polysystem Theory” [in Chinese]. Journal of Foreign Languages 51. 64–71.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Repertoire Transfer and Resistance: The Westernization of Translation Studies in China”. The Translator 15:2. 305–325.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Translation Studies, Academic Norms and Cultural Traditions” [in Chinese]. Chinese Translators Journal 21. 73–80.Google Scholar
Chen Fukang. 1992. Zhongguo yixue lilun shi gao (History of Chinese Translation Theory). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
Chong Yau Yuk. 2000. A Study of the Phenomenon of Authoritativeness in the Chinese Translations of the Protestant Bible [in Chinese]. Hong Kong: International Bible Society.Google Scholar
Codde, Philippe. 2003. “Polysystem Theory Revisited”. Poetics Today 24:1. 91–126.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Even-Zohar, Itamar. 1975. “Decisions in Translating Poetry” [in Hebrew]. Ha-sifrut/Literature 211. 32–45.Google Scholar
. 1978. Papers in Historical Poetics. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
. 1979. “Polysystem Theory”. Poetics Today 1:1–2. 287–310.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. “Polysystem Theory”. Poetics Today 11:1. 9–26.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990a. “The Position of Translated Literature within the Literary Polysystem”. Poetics Today 11:1. 45–51.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990b. “The ‘Literary System’”. Poetics Today 11:1. 27–44.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990c. “Interference in Dependent Literary Polysystems”. Polysystem Studies, Poetics Today 11:1. 79–83.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990d. “System, Dynamics, and Interference in Culture: A Synoptic View”. Poetics Today 11:1. 85–95.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. “The Making of Culture Repertoire and the Role of Transfer”. Target 9:2. 355–363.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997a. “Factors and Dependencies in Culture: A Revised Outline for Poly-system Culture Research”. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature 24:3. 15–34.Google Scholar
2002. “Literature as goods, Literature as Tools”. Neohelicon 1 (XXIX). 75–83.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feidman, Yael S. 1985. “Poetics and Politics: Israeli Literary Criticism between East and West.” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research vol. LII1. 9–35.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentzler, Edwin. 1993. Contemporary Translation Theories. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2001. Contemporary Translation Theories (Revised 2nd Edition). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
. 2008. Translation and Identity in the Americas: New Directions in Translation Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gouanvic, Jean-Marc. 2007. “Objectivation, réflexivité et traduction. Pour une re-lecture bourdieuscienne de la traduction. Michaela Wolf and Alexandra Fukari, eds. Constructing a Sociology of Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 79–92.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermans, Theo. 1994. “Translation between Poetics and Ideology”. Translation and Literature 31. 138–145.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “Norms and the Determination of Translation: A Theoretical Framework”. Roman Álvarez and M. Carmen-África Vidal, eds. Translation, Power, Subversion. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 25–51.Google Scholar
. 1999. Translation in Systems: Descriptive and System-oriented Approaches Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Huang Dexian. 2006. “Duoyuanxitonglun shiyi: Zuohaer fangtan lu” (Clarifications on Polysystem Theory: Interview with Even-Zohar). Chinese Translators Journal 31. 57–60.Google Scholar
Lefevere, André. 1988–1989. “Systems Thinking and Cultural Relativism”. Jadavpur Journal of Comparative Literature 26–271. 55–68.Google Scholar
. 1992. Translation, Rewriting, & the Manipulation of Literary Fame. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lu Xun. 1931/1984 “Lu Xun he Qu Qiubai guanyu fanyi de tongxin: Lu Xun de fuxin”. (Correspondence between Lu Xun and Qu Qiubai on Translation: Reply of Lu Xun). Luo Xinzhang, Ed. Fanyi lun ji (Essays on Translation). Beijing: Commercial Press. 273–279.Google Scholar
Meylaerts, Reine. 2006. “Heterolingualism in/and Translation: How Legitimate Are the Other and His/Her Language? An Introduction”. Target 13: 2. 317–332Google Scholar
Said, Edward. 1996. Representations of the Intellectual. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Simeoni, Daniel. 1998. “The Pivotal Status of the Translator’s Habitus”. Target 10:1. 1–39.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, Robert L. 1994. Neutrality and the Academic Ethic. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
So Sin Nga. 2002. “A Critical Study of Inclusive Language in Protestant Chinese Bibles” [in Chinese]. MPhil. thesis, Lingnan University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Su Manshu (trans). 1903/1991. “Beican shijie” (A Miserable World) Su Manshu wenji (The Works of Su Manshu). 21 vols. Guangzhou: Flower City Publishing House. II1. 671–753.Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon. 1980. In Search of a Theory of Translation. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. “A Handful of Paragraphs on ‘Translation’ and ‘Norms’”. Current Issues in Language & Society 1–21. 10–32.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tymoczko, Maria. 1990. “Translation in Oral Tradition as a Touchstone for Translation Theory and Practice”. Susan Bassnett and André Lefevere, eds. Translation, History and Culture. London: Pinter (reprinted London: Cassell 1995). 46–55.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Translation and Political Engagement: Activism, Social Change and the Role of Translation in Geopolitical Shifts”. The Translator 6–1. 23–47.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. 1998. The Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ehtics of Difference. London: Routledge.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation (2nd Edition). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wang Dongfeng. 2000. “Cultural Position of Translated Literature and Translator’s Cultural Attitude” [in Chinese]. Chinese Translators Journal 41. 2–8.Google Scholar
. 2008. “When a Turning Occurs: Counter-evidence to Polysystem Hypothesis”. Wang Ning and Sun Yifeng, eds. Translation, Globalisation and Localisation: A Chinese Perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 140–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang Xiaoyuan. 2006. “Translation, Ideology and Discourse: Literary Translation in China 1895–1911” [in Chinese]. PhD thesis, Lingnan University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Wolf, Michaela. 2007. “Introduction: The Emergence of a Sociology of Translation”. Michaela Wolf and Alexandra Fukari, eds. Constructing a Sociology of Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–36.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007a. “The Location of the ‘Translation Field’: Negotiating Borderlines between Pierre Bourdieu and Homi Bhabha”. Michaela Wolf and Alexandra Fukari, eds. Constructing a Sociology of Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 109–119.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu Jun (ed.). 1996. Wenzi,wenxue,wenhua: Hong Yu Hei Han yi yanjiu (Language, Literature and culture: A Study of the Chinese Translations of Le rouge et le noir). Nanjjing: Nanjing University Press.Google Scholar
Yahalom, Shelly. 1979. “Het gedrag van een literair polysysteem in een crisissituatie: Intersystemische contacten en soorten vertalingen”. André Lefevere and Ria Vanderauwera, eds. Vert aalwetenschap. Literatuur, wetenschap, vertaling en vertalen. Leuven: Acco. 64–85.Google Scholar
Zhang Qiyan. 2005. “On the Non-adequacy of Polysystem Theory in Explaining Literary Translation” [in Chinese]. Journal of Sichuan International Studies University 11. 100–103.Google Scholar
Zhu Yige. 2003. “Cong Pangde he Lin Shu fanyi ge’an fanguan duoyuanxitong lilun (Looking back at Polysystem Theory from a Case Study of the Translation of Ezra Pound and Lin Shu). Foreign Language Teaching Abroad 41. 25–28.Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Huang, Qin & Roberto A. Valdeón
2022. Perspectives on translation and world literature. Perspectives 30:6 ► pp. 899 ff. DOI logo
Öyken, Ekin
2022. The early oblivion of the firstAeneidin Turkish: aiming at a moving target. Classical Receptions Journal 14:3 ► pp. 399 ff. DOI logo
Shuttleworth, Mark
2019. Polysystem theory. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, ► pp. 419 ff. DOI logo
Fotheringham, Christopher
2017. A cognitive-pragmatic model for translation-shift analysis in descriptive case studies. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 35:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Tong King
2017. The identity and ideology of Chinese translators. In The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Translation, ► pp. 244 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Jing & Minhui Xu
2017. From norm-breaking to norm-making: a sociological study of the genesis of a new norm. Perspectives 25:1 ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
마승혜
2017. A Polysystem Revisited in Korea and a Discussion for a System Evolution. The Journal of Translation Studies 18:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Chang, Nam Fung
2010. Polysystem theory and translation. In Handbook of Translation Studies [Handbook of Translation Studies, 1], ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.