Cover not available
Article published In:
Target
Vol. 27:2 (2015) ► pp.273–300

Thinking for translating

A think-aloud protocol on the translation of manner-of-motion verbs

| University of Murcia
| University of Murcia
Typological studies on the linguistic expression of motion are certainly of interest to translation scholars. The study of how motion is expressed across languages has indeed revealed some striking typological differences (e.g., Talmy 1985, 1991, 2000; Berman and Slobin 1994; Stromqvist and Verhoeven 2004), which can account for some of the strategies translators resort to when dealing with motion expressions (Slobin 1996; Ibarretxe-Antuñano 2003; Cifuentes-Férez 2006, 2013; Ibarretxe-Antuñano and Filipović 2013). However, the question still remains as to whether translators’ decisions are exclusively guided by such typological differences or whether there are other experience- or task-related factors that may explain their behaviour. This paper provides empirical evidence on the type of factors that guide translators’ decisions when translating manner-ofmotion verbs, exploring the impact of different types of texts and the translator’s level of expertise. For this purpose, a pilot think-aloud protocol is implemented in order to examine the translation process of ten Spanish translators (five professionals and five graduate students without professional experience) when transferring manner-of-motion verbs from English into Spanish. Our results reveal that the way translators deal with manner information is mainly influenced by typological differences between the two languages. But differences in the translators’ level of professional expertise and in task-related constraints (e.g., the degree in which different type of texts focus on motion verbs) also have an effect on the strategies that translators choose to convey manner information.
Keywords: Thinking-for-speaking, manner of motion, English, Spanish, translation, think-aloud protocol
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.‘Thinking for translating’ theory
  • 3.A think-aloud protocol on the translation of motion verbs
    • 3.1Aim
    • 3.2Participants
    • 3.3Materials
    • 3.4Procedure
    • 3.5Results and discussion
      • 3.5.1Task-related factors in the translation of manner-of-motion verbs
      • 3.5.2The role of expertise
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 June 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.27.2.05cif
References (43)
References
Aske, John. 1989. “Path Predicates in English and Spanish: A Closer Look.” Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 151: 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aurnague, Michel. 2011. “How Motion Verbs are Spatial: The Spatial Foundations of Intransitive Motion Verbs in French.” Lingvisticae Investigationes 34 (1): 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John, Beth Levin, and Shiao Wei Tham. 2010. “The Typology of Motion Expressions Revisited.” Journal of Linguistics 461: 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth, and Dan I. Slobin, eds. 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Boynton, Sandra. 1993. Barnyard Dance! New York: Workman Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2012. “English is Less Rich in Manner-of-motion Verbs when Translated from French.” Across Languages and Cultures 13(2): 173–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, Paula. 2006. La Expresión de los Dominios de Movimiento y Visión en Inglés y en Español desde la Perspectiva de la Lingüística Cognitiva. Unpublished M.A. thesis Universidad de Murcia.
. 2009. A Crosslinguistic Study on the Semantics of Motion Verbs in English and Spanish. Munich: LINCOM.Google Scholar
. 2013. “El Tratamiento de los Verbos de Manera de Movimiento y de los Caminos en la Traducción Inglés-Español de Textos Narrativos.” Miscelánea 471: 53–80.Google Scholar
. 2014. “A Closer Look at Paths of Vision, Manner of Vision and their Translation from English into Spanish.” Languages in Contrast 14 (2): 214–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Suzanne. 2010. Mockingjay. New York: Scholastic Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William, Johanna Barðdal, Willem B. Hollmann, Violeta Sotirova, and Chiaki Taoka. 2010. “Revising Talmy’s Typological Classification of Complex Event Constructions.” In Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar, ed. by Hans C. Boas, 201–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2004. BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available online at [URL]. Accessed 16 June 2014.
Fanego, Teresa. 2012. “Motion Events in English: The Emergence and Diachrony of Manner Salience from Old English to Late Modern English.” Folia Linguistica Historica 331: 29–85.Google Scholar
Filipović, Luna. 1999. Language-specific Expression of Motion and its Use in Narrative Texts. MPhil diss. University of Cambridge.
. 2008. “Typology in Action: Applying Insights from Typological Contrasts.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18 (1): 42–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipović, Luna, and Ivana Vidaković. 2010. “Typology in the L2 Classroom: Second Language Acquisition from a Typological Perspective.” In Inside the Learner’s Mind: Cognitive Processing in Second Language Acquisition, ed. by Martin Pütz and Laura Sicola, 269–291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2003. “What Translation Tells Us about Motion: A Contrastive Study of Typologically Different Languages.” International Journal of English Studies 3 (2): 151–176.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Path Salience in Motion Events.” In Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, ed. by Elena Lieven, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Jiansheng Guo, Nancy Budwig, Keiko Nakamura, and Șeyda Őzçalişkan, 403–414. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. “Linguistic Typology in Motion Events: Path and Manner.” Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca ‘Julio de Urquijo.’ International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, and Luna Filipović. 2013. “Lexicalisation Patterns and Translation.” In Cognitive Linguistics and Translation: Advances in Some Theoretical Models and Applications, ed. by Ana Rojo and Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, 251–282. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaka, Airoa. 2009. “Mugimenduzko Ekintzak Ingelesez eta Euskaraz, Sarrionandiaren Itzulpen Baten Zzterketatik Abiatuta.” Uztaro 691: 53–76.Google Scholar
Jääskeläinen, Riitta. 2011. “Studying the Translation Process.” In The Oxford Handbook of Translation Studies, ed. by Kirsten Malmkjaer and Kevin Windle, 123–135. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kopecka, Annetta. 2006. “The Semantic Structure of Motion Verbs in French: Typological Perspectives.” In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, ed. by Maya Hickman and Stephanie Robert, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “From Satellite- to a Verb-framed Pattern: A Typological Shift in French.” In Variation and Change in Adpositions of Movement, ed. by Hubert Cuyckens, Walter de Mulder, and Tanja Moltermans. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog, Where Are You? New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Papafragou, Anna, Christine Massey, and Lila Gleitman. 2006. “When English Proposes What Greek Presupposes: The Cross-linguistic Encoding of Motion Events.” Cognition 981: 75–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pourcel, Stephanie, and Annetta Kopecka. 2005. “Motion Expression in French: Typological Diversity.” Durham and Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 111: 139–153.Google Scholar
Rojo, Ana, and Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano. 2013. Cognitive Linguistics and Translation: Advances in Some Theoretical Models and Applications. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “From ‘Thought and Language’ to ‘Thinking for Speaking’.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by John Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson, 195–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Mind, Code and Text.” In Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón, ed. by Joan Bybee, John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thomson, 437–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Language and Thought Online: Cognitive Consequences of Linguistic Relativity.” In Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, ed. by Dedre Gentner and Susan Goldin-Meadow, 157–192. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “The Many Ways to Search for a Frog: Linguistic Typology and the Expression of Motion Events.” In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives in Translation, ed. by Sven Strömqvist and Ludo Verhoeven, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Narrating Events in Translation.” In Perspectives on Language and Language Development: Essays in Honor of Ruth A. Berman, ed. by Dorit Ravid and Hava Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot, 115–129. Dordrecht: Kluver. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “What Makes Manner of Motion Salient?” In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, ed. by Maya Hickman and Stephanie Robert, 59–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I., and Nini Hoiting. 1994. “Reference to Movement in Spoken and Signed Language: Typological Considerations.” Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 487–505. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Soroli, Efstathia, Halima Sahraoui, and Carol Sacchett. 2012. “Linguistic Encoding of Motion Events in English and French. Typological Constraints on Second Language Acquisition and Agrammatical Aphasia.” Language Interaction and Acquisition 3(2): 261–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strömqvist, Sven, and Ludo Verhoeven. 2004. Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. “Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms.” In Language Typology and Lexical Descriptions: Vol. 3. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 36–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. “Path to Realization: A Typology of Event Conflation.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 71: 480–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. 2 vols1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (15)

Cited by 15 other publications

Başer, Zeynep & Caner Çetİner
2023. Examining translation behaviour of Turkish student translators in scientific text translation with think-aloud protocols. Meta 67:2 ► pp. 274 ff. DOI logo
Napoli, Donna Jo, Jami Fisher & Gene Mirus
2023. Taboo in Sign Languages, DOI logo
Chernovaty, Leonid & Natalia Kovalchuk
2021. Psycholinguistic Aspects of the Development of Students’ Critical Approach to the Solution of Terminological Problems in Online Translation Learning . East European Journal of Psycholinguistics 8:2 DOI logo
Molés-Cases, Teresa & Paula Cifuentes-Férez
2021. Translating narrative style. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 517 ff. DOI logo
Zheng, Jianwei & Wenjun Fan
2021. Different processes for translating expressive versus informative texts? A computer-assisted study of professionals’ English–Chinese translation. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36:3 ► pp. 782 ff. DOI logo
Cappelle, Bert
2020. Chapter 8. Looking into visual motion expressions in Dutch, English, and French. In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Sang-Bin
2019. Holistic assessment of consecutive interpretation. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 21:2 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M.
2018. Towards a typology of pedagogy-oriented translation and interpreting research. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 12:3 ► pp. 322 ff. DOI logo
Alonso, Rosa Alonso
2018. Translating motion events into typologically distinct languages. Perspectives 26:3 ► pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Filipović, Luna
2018. Speaking in a second language but thinking in the first language: Language-specific effects on memory for causation events in English and Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism 22:2 ► pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Filipović, Luna
2019. Bilingualism in Action, DOI logo
Molés-Cases, Teresa
2018. Some advances in the study of the translation of manner of motion events. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Rojo, Ana & Paula Cifuentes-Férez
2017. Chapter 13. On the reception of translations. In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59], ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
Cifuentes Férez, Paula
2015. Thinking-for-translating. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 2:2 ► pp. 302 ff. DOI logo
Rojo, Ana
2015. Translation meets cognitive science: The imprint of translation on cognitive processing. Multilingua 34:6 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.