Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Translation in times of technocapitalism
Edited by Stefan Baumgarten and Jordi Cornellà-Detrell
[Target 29:2] 2017
► pp. 193–200

Introduction

| Bangor University,
| University of Glasgow,
Article outline
  • 1.Instrumental rationality as domination
  • 2.The hegemony of technological evolution
  • Acknowledgments
  • References


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 29 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.29.2.001int
References (15)
References
Adorno, Theodor W., and Max Horkheimer. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Roman, and M. Carmen Africa Vidal, eds. 1996. Translation, Power, Subversion. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Calzada-Pérez, Maria, ed. 2003. Apropos of Ideology: Translation Studies in Ideology – Ideologies in Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Earl, Jennifer, and Katrina Kimport. 2011. Digitally Enabled Social Change – Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ertürk, Nergis, and Özge Serin, eds. 2016. Marxism, Communism, and Translation: The Language of Capital. Special issue of Boundary 2: An International Journal of Literature and Culture 43 (3). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. [URL]Google Scholar
Fawcett, Peter. 1995. “Translation and Power Play.” The Translator 1 (2): 177–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feenberg, Andrew. 2010. Between Reason and Experience – Essays in Technology and Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gambier, Yves, and Henrik Gottlieb, eds. 2001. (Multi) Media Translation: Concepts, Practices, and Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, Matthew Wing-Kwong. 2006. “The Ideological Turn in Translation Studies.” In Translation Studies at the Interface of Disciplines, ed. by Alexandra Assis Rosa, João Ferreira Duarte, and Teresa Seruya, 129–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munday, Jeremy. 2007. Style and Ideology in Translation: Latin American Writing in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy, and Sonia Cunico, eds. 2007. Translation and Ideology: Encounters and Clashes. Special issue of The Translator 13 (2). Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Nakai, Naoki, and Jon Solomon. 2006. “Introduction: Addressing the Multitude of Foreigners, Echoing Foucault.” In Translation, Biopolitics, Colonial Difference, ed. by Naoki Sakai, and Jon Solomon, 1–35. Hongkong: Hongkong University Press.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony. 2015. “Translation and Economics: Rational Decisions, Competing Tongues, and Measured Literacy.” Preprint (Version 2.4. April 7, 2015). Accessed January 19, 2017. [URL]
Suarez-Villa, Luis. 2016. Globalization and Technocapitalism: The Political Economy of Corporate Power and Technological Domination. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tymoczko, Maria, and Edwin Gentzler, eds. 2002. Translation and Power. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Fırat, Gökhan, Joanna Gough & Joss Moorkens
2024. Translators in the platform economy: a decent work perspective. Perspectives 32:3 ► pp. 422 ff. DOI logo
Martín Ruano, Maria Rosario
2022. De evoluciones y retos en la investigación traductológica del siglo XXI. TRANS: Revista de Traductología 26:1 ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Zwischenberger, Cornelia & Alexa Alfer
2022. Translaboration. Translation in Society 1:2 ► pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
Vieira, Lucas Nunes
2020. Automation anxiety and translators. Translation Studies 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.