Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation in times of technocapitalism
Edited by Stefan Baumgarten and Jordi Cornellà-Detrell
[Target 29:2] 2017
► pp. 264–283

Technology, translation and society

A constructivist, critical theory approach

 | University of Manchester
Translation studies and social theories of translation tend not to deal adequately with questions regarding the role of technology in translation and have neglected the ways in which technologies, as non-human entities, embody and materialize hegemonic and power relations. This paper seeks to address this shortcoming by looking to science and technology studies (STS) for conceptual frameworks to help us to understand and articulate (a) how popular, deterministic perceptions of translation technology are perpetuated through the discourses of hegemonic actors, (b) how decisions regarding design and use of translation technologies may be studied with reference to their construction and interpretation by relevant social groups, and (c) how a critical theory of technology and an analytical focus on practices can help to focus our attention on the exercise of hegemonic control in the translation sector.
Keywords: translation technology, science and technology studies, social construction of technology, critical theory of technology, practice theory
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Technological determinism
  • 3.Social construction of technology
  • 4.Technology and power
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 29 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.29.2.04olo
References (66)
References
Adler, Paul S. 2007. “The Future of Critical Management Studies: A Paleo-Marxist Critique of Labour Process Theory.” Organization Studies 28 (9): 1313–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, Stefan. 2016. “The Crooked Timber of Self-reflexivity: Translation and Ideology in the End Times.” Perspectives 24 (1): 115–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe E. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Towards a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. “How Is Technology Made? That Is the Question!” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 63–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor Pinch, eds. 1987. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
, eds. 2012. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe E., and Trevor Pinch. 2012. “Preface to the Anniversary Edition.” In Bijker, Hughes and Pinch 2012, xi–xxxiv.Google Scholar
Bräuchler, Birgit, and John Postill, eds. 2010. Theorising Media and Practice. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Chandler, Jennifer A. 2012. “‘Obligatory Technologies’ Explaining Why People Feel Compelled to Use Certain Technologies.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 32 (4): 255–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contu, Alessia. 2014. “On Boundaries and Difference: Communities of Practice and Power Relations in Creative Work.” Management Learning 45 (3): 289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contu, Alessia, and Hugh Willmott. 2006. “Studying Practice: Situating Talking About Machines.” Organization Studies 27 (12): 1769–1782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Michael. 2003. Translation and Globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2013. Translation in the Digital Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dafoe, Allan. 2015. “On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and a Mechanism.” Science, Technology & Human Values 40 (6): 1047–1076. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobbins, Michael. 2009. Urban Design and People. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Donoghue, Patrick. 2013. “Common Sense Advisory Lists Lionbridge as the #1 Language Service Provider.” Accessed June 7, 2016. [URL]
Dorrier, Jason. 2016. “Will the End of Moore’s Law Halt Computing’s Exponential Rise?” Singularity HUB . Accessed March 8, 2016. [URL]
Feenberg, Andrew. 1992. “Subversive Rationalization: Technology, Power, and Democracy.” Inquiry 35 (3–4): 301–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Questioning Technology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Critical Theory of Technology: An Overview.” Tailoring Biotechnologies 1 (1): 47–64.Google Scholar
Fisher, Eran. 2010. “Contemporary Technology Discourse and the Legitimation of Capitalism.” European Journal of Social Theory 13 (2): 229–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Hackett, Edward J., Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, eds. 2008. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1998. Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
, ed. 2011. The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David. 2015. “Consolidating Power.” ROAR Magazine. Accessed September 3, 2016. [URL].Google Scholar
Herman, Andrew. 1982. “Conceptualizing Control: Domination and Hegemony in the Capitalist Labor Process.” The Insurgent Sociologist 11 (3): 7–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hommels, Anique. 2005. “Studying Obduracy in the City: Toward a Productive Fusion between Technology Studies and Urban Studies.” Science, Technology & Human Values 30 (3): 323–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornborg, Alf. 2014. “Technology as Fetish: Marx, Latour, and the Cultural Foundations of Capitalism.” Theory, Culture & Society 31 (4): 119–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Thomas P. 1983. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, W. John. 1995. “Machine Translation: A Brief History.” In Concise History of the Language Sciences: From the Sumerians to the Cognitivists, ed. by E. F. K. Koerner, and R. E. Asher, 431–445. Kidlington: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Dorothy. 2011. “The Ethics of Machine Translation.” In Proceedings of the 20th NZSTI National Conference. Reflections on Language and Technology, ed. by Sybille Ferner, 121–131. Auckland: New Zealand Society of Translators and Interpreters.Google Scholar
Kenny, Dorothy, and Stephen Doherty. 2014. “Statistical Machine Translation in the Translation Curriculum: Overcoming Obstacles and Empowering Translators.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 8 (2): 276–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Hans K., and Daniel Lee Kleinman. 2002. “The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations.” Science, Technology & Human Values 27 (1): 28–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Leonardi, Paul M., and Stephen R. Barley. 2010. “What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing.” The Academy of Management Annals 4 (1): 1–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littau, Karin. 2016. “Translation and the Materialities of Communication.” Translation Studies 9 (1): 82–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 2005. Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 2008. “Ideas and Perspectives.” In Hackett et al. 2008, 9–11.Google Scholar
Moore, Gordon E. 1975. “Progress in Digital Integrated Electronics.” IEDM Technical Digest 19751: 11–13.Google Scholar
Morozov, Evgeny. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Nicolini, Davide. 2009. “Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections.” Organization Studies 30 (12): 1391–1418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Sharon. 2012. “Translation as Human-Computer Interaction.” Translation Spaces 1 (1): 101–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Hagan, Minako. 2016. “Massively Open Translation: Unpacking the Relationship between Technology and Translation in the 21st Century.” International Journal of Communication 101: 929–946.Google Scholar
Olohan, Maeve. 2011. “Translators and Translation Technology: The Dance of Agency.” Translation Studies 4 (3): 342–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Forthcoming 2017. “Knowledge and Knowing in Translation Practice.” Translation Spaces.
Orr, Julian Edgerton. 1996. Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pinch, Trevor J., and Wiebe E. Bijker. 1984. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” Social Studies of Science 14 (3): 399–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, William I. 2012. “Global Capitalism Theory and the Emergence of Transnational Elites.” Critical Sociology 38 (3): 349–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. A Theory of Global Capitalism: Production, Class, and State in a Transnational World. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Introduction: Practice Theory.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. by Theodore, R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr-Cetina, and Eike von Savigny, 1–14. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, and Matt Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sismondo, Sergio. 2010. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Thorpe, Charles. 2008. “Political Theory in Science and Technology Studies.” In Hackett et al. 2008, 63–82.Google Scholar
van der Meer, Jaap. 2016. “The Future Does Not Need Translators.” TAUS Blog. Accessed February 24, 2016. [URL]Google Scholar
Waldrop, Mitchell. 2016. “The Chips Are Down for Moore’s Law.” Nature News February 9, 2016. Archive 530 (7589). [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warde, Alan. 2016. The Practice of Eating. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Winner, Langdon. 1983. “Technologies as Forms of Life.” In Epistemology, Methodology and the Social Sciences, ed. by Robert S. Cohen, and Marx W. Wartofsky, 249–263. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Also in Winner 1986, Chapter 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Where Technological Determinism Went.” In Visions of STS: Counterpoints in Science, Technology, and Society Studies, ed. by Stephen H. Cutcliffe, and Carl Mitcham, 11–18. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Wyatt, Sally. 2008. “Technological Determinism is Dead: Long Live Technological Determinism.” In Hackett et al. 2008, 165–180.Google Scholar
Cited by (25)

Cited by 25 other publications

Cukur, Leandra
2024. Towards an ethical framework for evaluating paid translation crowdsourcing and its consequences. The Translator 30:1 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Fırat, Gökhan, Joanna Gough & Joss Moorkens
2024. Translators in the platform economy: a decent work perspective. Perspectives 32:3 ► pp. 422 ff. DOI logo
Krüger, Ralph & Janiça Hackenbuchner
2024. A competence matrix for machine translation-oriented data literacy teaching. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 36:2 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Kılıç, Azer
2024. Universal Basic Income as a Response to Automation? Attitudes of Human Translators Facing Neural Machine Translation. Critical Sociology DOI logo
Ruffo, Paola
2024. Literary translators and technology: SCOT as a proactive and flexible approach. Perspectives 32:3 ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Sakamoto, Akiko, Darren van Laar, Joss Moorkens & Félix do Carmo
2024. Measuring translators’ quality of working life and their career motivation. Translation Spaces 13:1 ► pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Tieber, Michael & Stefan Baumgarten
2024. Mean machines? Sociotechnical (r)evolution and human labour in the translation and interpreting industry. Perspectives 32:3 ► pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
de Groote, Brecht
2023. Translation as cultural technique. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 35:2 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Rossi, Caroline, Amélie Josselin Leray, Nicolas Ballier & Hanna Martikainen
2023. Le projet européen MultiTraiNMT Un premier retour sur les usages et les besoins au sein des formations universitaires françaises . In Human Translation and Natural Language Processing Towards a New Consensus? , DOI logo
Rossi, Caroline & Talbot, Aurelien
2023. Traduction automatique et traduction institutionnelle : le modèle neuronal a-t-il changé la donne ? . In Human Translation and Natural Language Processing Towards a New Consensus? , DOI logo
Tieber, Michael
2023. Investigating Translation Concepts in Machine Translation. In Translaboration in Analogue and Digital Practice [Transkulturalität – Translation – Transfer, 57], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Vieira, Lucas Nunes, Carol O’Sullivan, Xiaochun Zhang & Minako O’Hagan
2023. Machine translation in society: insights from UK users. Language Resources and Evaluation 57:2 ► pp. 893 ff. DOI logo
Vogeler, Georg & Philipp Hofeneder
2023. Die digitale Transformation der österreichischen Geisteswissenschaften und ihre Herausforderungen für die Zukunft: Strukturelle Perspektiven für die Integration von Datenwissenschaften, maschinellem Lernen und künstlicher Intelligenz. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung 18:Sonderheft Forschung ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Dore, Margherita & Angelica Petrucci
2022. Professional and amateur AVT. The Italian dubbing, subtitling and fansubbing of The Handmaid’s Tale. Perspectives 30:5 ► pp. 876 ff. DOI logo
Malmkjær, Kirsten
2022. Translation Studies fifty years on. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 8:3 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Ping, Yuan
2022. Student perceptions of translation technology in a scientific and technical translation course. In Re-Thinking Translator Education [Sprachen lehren – Sprachen lernen, ], ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Sakamoto, Akiko
2022. Translation and Technology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Translation, ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Corpas Pastor, Gloria & Fernando Sánchez Rodas
2021.  Now what?. In Corpora in Translation and Contrastive Research in the Digital Age [Benjamins Translation Library, 158], ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Jiménez-Crespo, Miguel A.
2020. The “technological turn” in translation studies. Translation Spaces 9:2 ► pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Morini, Massimiliano
2020. Luciano Bianciardi. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 32:1 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Nunes Vieira, Lucas & Elisa Alonso
2020. Translating perceptions and managing expectations: an analysis of management and production perspectives on machine translation. Perspectives 28:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Rossi, Caroline
2020. Review of Bowker & Ciro (2019): Machine Translation and Global Research: Towards Improved Machine Translation Literacy in the Scholarly Community. Translation Spaces 9:2 ► pp. 342 ff. DOI logo
Sakamoto, Akiko & Masaru Yamada
2020. Social groups in machine translationpost-editing. Translation Spaces 9:1 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Dingkun
2020. Censorship and Manipulation in Audiovisual Translation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Audiovisual Translation and Media Accessibility [Palgrave Studies in Translating and Interpreting, ], ► pp. 621 ff. DOI logo
Wongseree, Thandao
2020. Understanding Thai fansubbing practices in the digital era: a network of fans and online technologies in fansubbing communities. Perspectives 28:4 ► pp. 539 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.