Article published In:
TargetVol. 3:2 (1991) ► pp.153–174
Methodological Aspects of Interpretation (and Translation) Research
Very little actual scientific research has been carried out in I/T to date, essentially because of the lack of scientific background among I/T investigators. Major problems are found in the sampling procedures, materials, experimental conditions and tasks, quantification procedures and conclusion-drawing logic. In order to foster I/T research, methodological research training could be given to investigators, and interdisciplinary contacts and networking should be promoted. The input of I/T practitioners to I/T research can be valuable in spite of their lack of training provided they use simple methods and are supervised appropriately. Non I/T practitioners should work with practitioners.
Article outline
- Introduction
-
Basic I/T Characteristics and Their Implications on Research
- 1.In I/T, input and output can be observed and recorded under particularly favorable conditions
- 2.Processes are NOT easy to observe and record
- 3.Although many rules on output, including relations between output and input, have been described, much of the process leading from input to output remains unknown
- 4.I/T situations and operations are highly variable
- 5.I/T operational environments are fairly simple
- Major Methodological Issues and Problems in I/T Research
- 1.Subjects in I/T experimentation
- 2Materials
- 3.Experimental conditions and tasks
- 4.Quantification and quality assessment
- 5.Conclusion-drawing
- Strategies for I/T Research
- Institutional Strategies
- – Research training
- – Research programs
- – Interdisciplinary contacts
- – Dissemination of information in I/T research circles
- – Multi-centre studies
- Strategies for Individuals
- – Strategies for I/T practitioners
- – Strategies for non-practitioners
-
References
References
Anderson, Linda
1979 Simultaneous Interpretation: Contextual and Translation Aspects. Montreal: Concordia University. [M.A. Thesis.]
Arjona-Tseng, Etilvia
1989 “Preparing for the XXIth Century”. Keynote speech. Proceedings of the Twentieth Anniversary Symposium: The Training of Teachers of Translation and Interpretation. Monterey, California: Monterey Institute of International Studies 1989.
Barik, Henri
1969 A Study in Simultaneous Interpretation. University of North Carolina. [Ph.D. Dissertation.]
Bühler, Hildegund
1986 “Linguistic (Semantic) and Extra-Linguistic (Pragmatic) Criteria for the Evaluation of Conference Interpretation and Interpreters”. Multilingua 51. 231–235.
Dillinger, Michael L.
1989 Component Processes of Simultaneous Interpreting. Montreal: McGill University. [Ph.D. Dissertation.]
1990 “Comprehension during Interpreting: What Do Interpreters Know that Bilinguals Don’t?” The Interpreter’s Newsletter (Trieste) 31. 41–58.
Flores d’Arcais, G.B.
1978 “The Contribution of Cognitive Psychology to the Study of Interpretation”. D. Gerver and H. Wallace Sinaico, eds. Language Interpretation and Communication. New York and London: Plenum Press, Nato Conference Series 1978 385–402. 
Fourastié, Jean
1966 Les conditions de l’esprit scientifique. Paris: Gallimard.
Gerver, David
1976 “Empirical Studies of Simultaneous Interpretation: A Review and a Model”. R. Brislin, ed. Translation Applications and Research. New York: Gardner Press 1976 165–207.
Gile, Daniel
1983 “Aspects méthodologiques de l’évaluation de la qualité du travail en interprétation simultanée”. Meta 28:3. 236–243.
1985 “La sensibilité aux écarts de langue et la sélection d’informateurs dans l’analyse d’erreurs”. The Incorporated Linguist 24:1. 29–32.
1989 La communication linguistique en réunion multilingue—Les difficultés de la transmission informationnelle en interprétation simultanée. Université Paris III. [Thèse de doctorat.]
1990a “Scientific Research vs. Personal Theories in the Investigation of Interpretation”.
Gran and Taylor, 1990
. 28–41.
1990b “Observational Studies and Experimental Studies in the Investigation of Interpetation”. Paper given at the Scuola Superiore di Lingue Moderne per Interpreti e Traduttori, Università degli Studi di Trieste, March 19, 1990. [Mimeo.]
1990c “L’évaluation de la qualité de l’interprétation par les délégués: une étude de cas”. The Interpreter’s Newsletter 31. 66–71.
1990d “Research Proposals for Interpreters”.
Gran and Taylor, 1990
. 226–236.
Gore, Sheila M. and Douglas G. Altman
1982 Statistics in Practice. London: British Medical Association.
Gran, Laura and John Dodds
eds. 1989 The Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Teaching Conference Interpretation: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Conference Interpreting at the University of Trieste. Udine: Campanotto Editore.
Gran, Laura and Christopher Taylor
eds. 1990 Aspects of Applied and Experimental Research on Conference Interpretation. Udine: Campanotto Editore.
Hansen, M., W. Hurwitz and W. Madow
1953 Sample Surveys Methods and Theory. New York, London and Sydney: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Hoffstaedter, Petra
1987 “Poetic Text Processing and Its Empirical Investigation”. Poetics 161. 75–91.
Kurz, Ingrid
1989 “Conference Interpreting: User Expectations”. ATA—Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference. Medford, NJ: Learned Information Inc. 1989 143–148.
Meak, Lidia
1983 La selezione dell’informazione per l’interpretazione simultanea della literatura medica. Trieste: Università degli Studi di Trieste, Scuola Superiore di Lingue Moderne per Interpreti e Traduttori. [Unpublished Monograph.]
Pinter (Kurz), Ingrid
1969 Der Einfluss der Ubung und Konzentration auf Simultanes Sprechen und Horen. University of Vienna. [Doctoral Dissertation.]
Schor, S. and I. Karten
1966 “Statistical Evaluation of Medical Journal Manuscripts”. JAMA 1951. 1123–1128.
Seleskovitch, Danica
1975 Langage, langues et mémoire. Paris: Minard Lettres Modernes.
Shlesinger, Miriam
1989 Simultaneous Interpretation as a Factor in Effecting Shifts in the Position of Texts on the Oral-Literate Continuum. Tel Aviv University. [M.A. Thesis.]
Snedecor, George W. and William G. Cochran
1967 Statistical Methods, 6th Edition. Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press.
Stenzl, Catherine
1983 Simultaneous Interpretation—Groundwork towards a Comprehensive Model. University of London. [M.A. Thesis.]
Toury, Gideon
1991 “Experimentation in Translation Studies: Achievements, Prospects and Some Pitfalls”. Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit, ed. Empirical Research in Translation and Intercultural Studies: Selected Papers of the TRANSIF Seminar, Savonlinna 1988. Tübingen: Narr 1991 45–66.
Treisman, A.
1965 “The Effects of Redundancy and Familiarity on Translation and Repeating Back a Native and Foreign Language”. British Journal of Psychology 561. 369–379.
Viezzi, Maurizio
1989 “Information Retention as a Parameter for the Comparison of Sight Translation and Simultaneous Interpretation: An Experimental Study”. The Interpreter’s Newsletter 21. 65–69.
Cited by
Cited by 26 other publications
Ahn, In-Kyoung
2005. Pedagogical Considerations of Perspective Coherence Problems in Simultaneous Interpreting as a Result of Linguistic Structure, Illustrated by German-Korean Examples1. Meta 50:2 ► pp. 696 ff. 
Ahrens, Barbara
2017. Interpretation and Cognition. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 445 ff.
Cao, Deborah
1996. Towards a Model of Translation Proficiency. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 8:2 ► pp. 325 ff.
Choi, Gyung Hee
2013. Teaching Community Interpreting Students Consecutive Interpreting. FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 11:2 ► pp. 43 ff.
Dancette, Jeanne
1995. Bibliographie. In Parcours de traduction, ► pp. 227 ff.
Gile, Daniel
1998. Observational Studies and Experimental Studies in the Investigation of Conference Interpreting. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 10:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Halverson, Sandra L.
1997. The Concept of Equivalence in Translation Studies. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 9:2 ► pp. 207 ff.
He, Yuanjian, Linping Hou & Luna Yue Lang
2023. L2 Acquisition from Perspectives of Professional Translation and Interpreting. In Second Language Acquisition - Learning Theories and Recent Approaches [Working Title] [Education and Human Development, 0],
Ivars, Amparo Jiménez
2008. Sight Translation and Written Translation. A Comparative Analysis of Causes of Problems, Strategies and Translation Errors within the PACTE Translation Competence Model. FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 6:2 ► pp. 79 ff.
Lemos, Andréa Michiles
2014. Fraseologismo em língua de sinais e tradução: uma discussão necessária. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 14:4 ► pp. 1173 ff.
Macizo, Pedro & M. Teresa Bajo
2006. Reading for repetition and reading for translation: do they involve the same processes?. Cognition 99:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Mezcua, Aurora Ruiz
2023. Wine terminology for interpreters. In Text and Wine [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 38], ► pp. 222 ff.
Morales, Julia, Francisca Padilla, Carlos J. Gómez-Ariza & M. Teresa Bajo
2015. Simultaneous interpretation selectively influences working memory and attentional networks. Acta Psychologica 155 ► pp. 82 ff.
NOVITASARI, Sashi, Sakriani SAKTI & Satoshi NAKAMURA
2021. Neural Incremental Speech Recognition Toward Real-Time Machine Speech Translation. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E104.D:12 ► pp. 2195 ff.
Olalla-Soler, Christian
2020. Practices and attitudes toward replication in empirical translation and interpreting studies. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 32:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Pöchhacker, Franz
Pöchhacker, Franz
1995. Lambert, Sylvie & Barbara Moser-Mercer, eds. 1994. Bridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation.. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 7:1 ► pp. 181 ff.
Pędzisz, Joanna
2019. Kształcenie tłumacza symultanicznego a trening rozwoju osobistego. O portfolio tłumaczeniowym jako narzędziu wspierającym samopoznanie. Applied Linguistics Papers 2/2019:26 ► pp. 91 ff.
Ruiz, C., N. Paredes, P. Macizo & M.T. Bajo
2008. Activation of lexical and syntactic target language properties in translation. Acta Psychologica 128:3 ► pp. 490 ff.
Salevsky, Heidemarie
1993. The Distinctive Nature of Interpreting Studies. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 5:2 ► pp. 149 ff.
Schjoldager, Anne
1995. Interpreting Research and the ‘Manipulation School’ of Translation Studies1. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 7:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Stolze, Radegundis
2009. Worlds of discourse in translation studies. Across Languages and Cultures 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Strobach, Tilo, Maxi Becker, Torsten Schubert & Simone Kühn
2015. Better dual-task processing in simultaneous interpreters. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Sánchez Cuadrado, Adolfo
2017. Validación empírica del potencial pedagógico de la traducción: la atención a la forma en actividades colaborativas de traducción. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 4:2 ► pp. 136 ff.
Zheng, Binghan, Sandra Báez, Li Su, Xia Xiang, Susanne Weis, Agustín Ibáñez & Adolfo M. García
2020. Semantic and attentional networks in bilingual processing: fMRI connectivity signatures of translation directionality. Brain and Cognition 143 ► pp. 105584 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.