Chapter 9
Tasks in the pedagogic space
Using online discussion forum tasks and formative feedback to develop academic discourse skills at Master’s level
This chapter discusses two related studies, both carried out at our own institution with participant students enrolled on an MA in Applied Linguistics, and both aimed at exploring the development of academic discourse at Master’s level. Both studies draw on ‘task’ as a unifying point of reference. The first study examines student and tutor posts written in an online discussion forum for a first semester module on the MA programme. The forum, which comprises a series of reading, writing, and discussion tasks, was intended as an opportunity for students to relate concepts covered in the MA to existing beliefs and practices and to discuss the pedagogic implications of theory and research in applied linguistics. Our objective was to better understand how students perceive the purpose and value of online tasks. Student participation in the online tasks raised wider issues of engagement with pedagogic activities. This prompted us to carry out a second study concerning student engagement with feedback on assessed work throughout the academic year. For this, we carried out student interviews, inviting participants to bring with them one assessed assignment from the previous term and discuss their responses to the written comments they had received from tutors. We were especially interested in understanding students’ prior assumptions and expectations regarding feedback, to explore students’ readiness to make use of feedback and examine to what extent feedback can have an impact on academic writing.
In both studies we found a number of telling differences between student and staff perceptions of and orientation to the various tasks and activities being investigated. In our framing of the relevant pedagogic issues we consider the factors to emerge from the studies as components of a wider “pedagogic space”, a framing which has enabled us to make sense of the data by posing some very constructive questions and by reflecting on broader pedagogic, curriculum, and organisational matters.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Study one: The task-based discussion forum
- Background
- Task design
- Participating students and tutors
- Research focus and data handling
- Findings: Students’ perceptions of and engagement with the online discussion forum
- Findings: Tutor-student interaction in the online discussion forum
- Study two: Student engagement with feedback on written assignments
- Background
- Research focus
- Participants and data collection
- Data coding and analysis
- Findings: Student engagement with feedback
- Extract from Amy’s interview
- Extract from Sadie’s interview
- Extract from Miguel’s interview
- Extract from Fe’s interview
- Implications
- Pedagogic space: Affordances and limitations
- Framing tasks within the curriculum: Pedagogic issues for further consideration
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix
References
Alexander, R.
(
2008)
Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Thirsk: Diaogos.
Allwright, D.
(
2005)
From teaching points to learning opportunities and beyond.
TESOL Quarterly, 39, 9–31.
Bax, S.
(
2003)
The end of CLT: A context approach to language teaching.
ELT Journal, 57, 278–287.
Berg, B.
(
2009)
Qualitative research for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Copland, F.
(
2004)
MA courses in TEFL/TESOL: Are we meeting the needs of our Asian students? IATEFL Teacher Development SIG Newsletter Spring 2004, 5–8.
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N.
(
2014)
Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Abingdon: Routledge.
Foster, P.
(
1999)
Task-based learning and pedagogy.
ELT Journal, 53, 69–70.
Harmer, J.
(
2003)
Popular culture, methods, and context.
ELT Journal, 57, 288–294.
Howatt, A.
(
1984)
A History of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A.
(
1987)
ESP: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lo, Y.
(
2005)
Relevance of knowledge of second language acquisition: An in-depth case study of a non-native EFL teacher. In
N. Bartels. (Ed.),
Applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp.135–155). New York, NY: Springer.
Long, M.
(
2015)
Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Mann, S.
(
2011)
A critical review of qualitative interviews in applied linguistics.
Applied Linguistics, 32, 6–24. doi:
.
Mohan, B.
(
1990)
LEP students and the integration of language and content: knowledge structures and tasks. In
C. Simich-Dudgeon (Ed.),
Proceedings of the first research symposium on limited English proficient students’ issues (pp.113–160). Washington, DC: Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs.
Mohan, B.
(
2001)
The second language as a medium of learning. In
B. Mohan,
C. Leung, &
C. Davison (Eds.),
English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity (pp.107–126). London: Longman.
Mohan, B., & Slater, T.
(
2004)
The evaluation of causal discourse and language as a resource for meaning. In
J. A. Foley (Ed.),
Language, education, and discourse: Functional approaches (pp.255–269). London: Continuum.
Mohan, B., Slater, T., Beckett, G., & Tong, E.
Norris, J.
(
2016)
Language program evaluation.
The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 169–189.
Seedhouse, P.
(
1995)
Needs analysis and the general English classroom.
ELT Journal, 49, 59–65.
Skehan, P.
(
1998a)
Task-based instruction.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268–286.
Skehan, P.
(
1998b)
A cognitive approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swales, J.
(
1990)
Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Van den Branden, K.
(
2006)
Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Widdowson, H.
(
1990)
Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilkins, D.
(
1976)
Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wingate, U., Andon, N., & Cogo, A.
(
2011)
Embedding academic writing instruction into subject teaching: A case study.
Active Learning in Higher Education, 12, 69–71.
Yule, G., & M. Powers
(
1994)
Investigating the communicative outcomes of task-based interaction.
System, 22, 81–91.
Yule, G.
(
1997)
Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Leung, Constant
2020.
Learning-Oriented Assessment: More Than the Chalkface. In
Toward a Reconceptualization of Second Language Classroom Assessment [
Educational Linguistics, 41],
► pp. 85 ff.
Rokos, Lukáš
2020.
Mikrovyučování jako prostor pro implementaci vrstevnického hodnocení do přípravy studentů učitelství.
Pedagogická orientace 30:3
► pp. 315 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.