Cover not available
Part of
Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy: In honour of Peter Skehan
Edited by Zhisheng (Edward) Wen and Mohammad Javad Ahmadian
[Task-Based Language Teaching 13] 2019
► pp. 67–92

Chapter 4
The relationship between task motivation and L2 motivation

An empirical study

| The University of Auckland
| Florida State University

This chapter reports a study investigating the underlying construct of task motivation and its relationship with general motivation in learning English. A task motivation questionnaire was designed based on in-depth interviews with a group of Chinese university EFL students and was then administered to a larger population sample. L2 motivation was measured by means of an instrument based on Dörnyei’s L2 Self System. The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that task motivation and L2 motivation were distinct: learners’ attitudes toward the task are separate from the more generalized active/passive mindset of learning English. The results suggest the need to treat task motivation as an independent construct. The results have valuable implications for task-based research and L2 motivation research.

Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
    • Theoretical evolution of task motivation
    • Empirical studies of task motivation
      • Multiple actional contexts of task motivation
      • The task processing system
      • Task motivation as a complex dynamic system
  • The study
    • Methodology
      • Participants
    • The task
    • Instruments
      • L2 motivation questionnaire
      • Task motivation questionnaire
    • Procedure
    • Analysis
    • Results
      • RQ 1 what does task motivation entail?
      • RQ 2 is task motivation distinguishable from L2 motivation?
  • Discussion
    • Attitudes toward the task
    • Task as a diagnostic tool
    • Task motivation and L2 motivation
    • Active mind-set of learning English
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 28 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.13.05wan
References
Beaujean, A. A.
(2014) Latent variable modeling using R: A step-by-step guide. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J.-P., & Zhang, Z.
(2012) Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of personality, 80(1), 219–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2002) The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp.137–158). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J.
(2000) The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 275–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P.
(2003) Individual differences in second language learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.589–630). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Tseng, W. -T.
(2009) Motivational processing in interactional tasks. In S. M. Gass, A. Mackey, & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp.117–134). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Julkunen, K.
(1989) Situation- and task-specific motivation in foreign language learning and teaching. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S.
(1995) At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kline, R. B.
(2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Kormos, J., & Dörnyei, Z.
(2004) The interaction of linguistic and motivational variables in second language task performance. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 9(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2015) Ten ‘lessons’ from complex dynamic systems theory: What is on offer. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp.11–19). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Li, L., Chen, J., & Sun, L.
(2015) The effects of different lengths of pretask planning time on L2 learners’ oral test performance. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 38–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, W.
(2007) Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P., & Serroul, A.
(2015) Motivation on a per-second timescale: Examining approach-avoidance motivation during L2 task performance. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp.109–138). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pang, F., & Skehan, P.
(2014) Self-reported planning behaviour and second language performance in narrative retelling. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp.95–127). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poupore, G.
(2013) Task motivation in process: A complex systems perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(1), 91–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2011) Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp.3–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1996) A framework for the implementation of task based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(1999) The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3(3), 215–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Strategic and on-line planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.193–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Shum, S.
(2014) Structure and processing condition in video-based narrative retelling. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp.187–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S.
(2014) Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M.
(2009) The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp.66–97). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z., & Skehan, P.
(2014) Structure, lexis, and time perspective. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspective on task performance (pp.155–185). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
You, C. J., & Dörnyei, Z.
(2014) Language learning motivation in China: Results of a large-scale stratified survey. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 495–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Ghanbaran, Samira, Saeed Ketabi & Mohammadtaghi Shahnazari
2023. Investigating the Effect of Task Type and Modality on Flow Experience Among Intermediate Persian EFL Learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:6 ► pp. 2835 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Qi & Hongying Peng
2022. Exploring learner motivation and mobile‐assisted peer feedback in a business English speaking course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 38:4 ► pp. 1033 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.