References
(Studies with asterisks are included in the narrative review)
Abrams, Z. I. (2003). The
effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. The
Modern Language
Journal, 87(2), 157–167.
AbuSeileek, A. F., & Qatawneh, K. (2013). Effects
of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) oral conversations on English language
learners’ discourse functions. Computers &
Education, 62, 181–190.
An, H., & Li, S. (2022). Working
memory and second language interaction. In J. Schwieter & Z. Wen (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of working memory and
language (pp. 656–698). Cambridge University Press.
An, H., & Li, S. (2024). The
effects of planning type, working memory, and anxiety on L2 writing
performance. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual
differences and task-based language
teaching (pp. 166–201). John Benjamins.
*Arnold. N. (2007). Reducing
foreign language communication apprehension with computer-mediated communication: A preliminary
study. System, 35(4), 469–486.
Bailey, P., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daley, C. E. (2000). Using
learning style to predict foreign language achievement at the college
level. System, 28(1), 115–133.
*Baralt, M., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2011). Comparing
learners’ state anxiety during task-based interaction in computer-mediated and face-to-face
communication. Language Teaching
Research, 15(2), 201–229.
*Bashori, M., van Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2022). Web-based
language learning and speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 35(5–6), 1058–1089.
Beauvois, M. H. (1998). E-talk:
Computer-assisted classroom discussion – attitudes and
motivation. In Swaffar, J., Romano, S., Markley, P., Arens, K. (Eds.), Language
learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer
classroom (pp. 99–120). Labyrinth Publications.
*Bistline-Bonilla, C. (2020). Interaction
in synchronous computer-mediated communication: The effects of interlocutor, task, and state
anxiety (Publication No. 28086452, Doctoral
dissertation). Georgetown
University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Bradley, T., & Lomicka, L. (2000). A
case study of learner interaction in technology-enhanced language learning
environments. Journal of Educational Computing
Research, 22(3), 347–368.
Chastain, K. (1975). Affective
and ability factors in second language acquisition. Language
Learning, 25, 153–161.
*Chen, M. R. A., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Effects
of a concept mapping-based flipped learning approach on EFL students’ English-speaking performance, critical
thinking awareness and speaking anxiety. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 51(3), 817–834.
Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A
measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary
validation. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 13, 313–335.
*Côté, S., & Gaffney, C. (2021). The
effect of synchronous computer-mediated communication on beginner L2 learners’ foreign language anxiety and
participation. The Language Learning
Journal, 49(1), 105–116.
*Di Loreto, S., & McDonough, K. (2013). The
relationship between instructor feedback and ESL student anxiety. TESL Canada
Journal, 31(1), 20–41.
*Donate, Á. (2018). Cognitive
task complexity, foreign language anxiety and L2 performance in Spanish: A task-based language teaching
perspective (Publication No. 10840376, Doctoral
dissertation). Georgetown
University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Donate, A., & Leow, R. (2024). Task
complexity, task features, task anxiety, and low L2 proficiency
levels. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual
differences and task-based language
teaching (pp. 115–142). John Benjamins.
Dörnyei, Z., & MacIntyre, P. (2006). Questionnaire
item pool |(Unpublished manuscript). School of
English Studies, University of Nottingham.
Ellis, R. (1994). The
study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based
language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Eysenck, M. (1979). Anxiety,
learning and memory: A reconceptualization. Journal of Research in
Personality, 13, 363–385.
Fukuda, Y. (2004). Treatment
of spoken errors in Japanese high school oral communication
classes (Unpublished master’s
thesis). California State University.
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A
student’s contributions to second-language learning: Part II. Affective
variables. Language
Teaching, 26(1), 1–11.
Hsieh, J. S. C., Wu, W. -C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using
the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 30(1–2), 1–21.
Horwitz, E. (2001). Language
anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 21, 112–126.
Horwitz, E., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign
language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language
Journal, 70, 125–132.
Ishikawa, M., & Révész, A. (2024). Written
languaging, language aptitude, and L2 learning through dictogloss
tasks. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual
differences and task-based language
teaching (pp. 144–165). John Benjamins.
*Jang, J. D. (2003). Relationship
between student anxiety and corrective feedback: Case of Korean college-level EFL
learners (Publication No. 3102374, Doctoral
dissertation. State University of New York at
Buffalo. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Kim, S. Y. (1998). Affective
experiences of Korean college students in different instructional contexts: Anxiety and motivation in reading
and conversation courses (Publication No. 9838018, Doctoral
dissertation). The University of Texas at
Austin. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Ko, C. (2012). Can
synchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) help beginning-level foreign language learners
speak? Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 25(3), 217–236.
Kormos, J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2004). The
interaction of linguistic and psychological variables in second language task
performance. Zeitschrift fur Interkulturellen
Fremdsprachunterricht [Online], 9(2). [URL]
*Kruk, M. (2021). Fluctuations
in self-perceived foreign language anxiety during visits to Second Life: A case
study. Innovation in Language Learning and
Teaching, 15(5), 393–405.
*Kruk, M. (2022). Dynamicity
of perceived willingness to communicate, motivation, boredom and anxiety in Second Life: The case of two
advanced learners of English. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 35(1–2), 190–216.
*Lee, E. J., (2016). Reducing
international graduate students’ language anxiety through oral pronunciation
corrections. System, 56, 78–95.
Li. S. (2010). The
effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language
Learning, 60(2), 309–365.
Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five
years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in
System. System, 84, 93–109.
Lin, C. -J., & Hwang, G. -J. (2018). A
learning analytics approach to investigating factors affecting EFL students’ oral performance in a flipped
classroom. Journal of Educational Technology &
Society, 21(2), 205–219. [URL]
Long, M. H. (1980). Input,
interaction and second language acquisition (Publication No. 8111249, Doctoral
dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Long, M. H. (1996). The
role of the linguistic environment in second language
acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook
of second language
acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
MacIntyre, P., & Gardner, R. (1994). The
effects of induced anxiety on three stages of cognitive processing in computerized vocabulary
learning. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 16(1), 1–17.
Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional
input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child
dyads. Language
Learning, 53(1), 35–66.
*Martin, S., & Alvarez Valdivia, I. M. (2017). Students’
feedback beliefs and anxiety in online foreign language oral
tasks. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher
Education, 14(1), 1–15.
Mayo, M. P. G., & Pica, T. (2000). Interaction
among proficient learners: are input, feedback and output needs addressed in a foreign language
context? Studia
Linguistica, 54(2), 272–279.
*Melchor-Couto, S. (2017). Foreign
language anxiety levels in Second Life oral
interaction. ReCALL, 29(1), 99–119.
*Muñoz, G. S. (2021). Second
Life: A virtual environment to reduce students’ foreign language anxiety. Vivat
Academia, 1–24. Retrieved
on 15 January
2024 from [URL]
*Namaziandost, E., Razmi, M. H., Hernández, R. M., Ocaña-Fernández, Y., & Khabir, M. (2021). Synchronous
CMC text chat versus synchronous CMC voice chat: Impacts on EFL learners’ oral proficiency and
anxiety. Journal of Research on Technology in
Education, 1–18.
Namkung, Y., & Kim, Y. (2024). A
review of learner motivation and engagement research in task-based language
teaching. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual
differences and task-based language
teaching (pp. 204–234). John Benjamins.
*Poza, M. I. C. (2005). The
effects of asynchronous computer voice conferencing on learners’ anxiety when speaking a foreign
language (Publication No. 3170905, Doctoral
dissertation), West Virginia
University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
*Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). Writing
task complexity, students’ motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in English as a second
language. Reading and
Writing, 32(3), 761–786.
*Rassaei, E. (2015a). Oral
corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and L2
development. System, 49, 98–109.
*Rassaei, E. (2015b). The
effects of foreign language anxiety on EFL learners’ perceptions of oral corrective
feedback. Innovation in Language Learning and
Teaching, 9(2), 87–101.
*Révész, A. (2011). Task
complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based
study. The Modern Language
Journal, 95, 162–181.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task
complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential
framework. Applied
Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57.
Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive
complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task
design. International Review of Applied
Linguistics, 43(1), 1–32.
*Robinson, P. (2007). Task
complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake
and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied
Linguistics, 45(3), 193–214.
Roed, J. (2003). Language
learner behaviour in a virtual environment. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 16(2–3), 155–172.
*Satar, H. & Ozdener, N. (2008). The
effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice
chat. The Modern Language
Journal, 92, 595–613.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition
and second language
instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.
Scovel, T. (1978). The
effect of affect on foreign language learning: A review of the anxiety
research. Language
Learning, 28(1), 129–142.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The
interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis
perspective. Blackwell.
*Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts,
language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language
Learning, 58(4), 835–874.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction
and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working
together. The Modern Language
Journal, 82, 320–337.
Teimouri, Y., Goetze, J., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Second
language anxiety and achievement: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 41(2), 363–387.
*Trebits, A. (2014). Sources
of individual differences in L2 narrative production: The contribution of input, processing, and output
anxiety. Applied
linguistics, 37(2), 155–174.
*Tsao, J. J., Tseng, W. T., & Wang, C. (2017). The
effects of writing anxiety and motivation on EFL college students’ self-evaluative judgments of corrective
feedback. Psychological
Reports, 120(2), 219–241.
Wang, Q., East, M., & Li, S. (2021). Measuring
Chinese EFL learners’ motivation and anxiety when completing a video narration task: Initial steps in
designing two
questionnaires. System, 100, 102559.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing
face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO
Journal, 13(2), 7–26. [URL].
*Wehner, A. K. (2014). Exploring
the relationship of motivation, anxiety, and virtual worlds in the experiences of two Spanish language
learners: A case study (Publication No. 3618510, Doctoral
dissertation). University of South
Florida. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
*Wu, H. J. (2015). The
effects of blog-supported collaborative writing on writing performance, writing anxiety and perceptions of EFL
college students in Taiwan (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). University of South
Florida.
Wu, W. -C. V., Hsieh, J. S. C., & Yang, J. C. (2017). Creating
an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance EFL learners’ oral
proficiency. Journal of Educational Technology &
Society, 20(2), 142–157. [URL]
*Wu, Y. (2016). Effects
of form-focused instruction, corrective feedback, and individual differences on the acquisition of Chinese
wh-questions and classifiers (Publication No. 10194652, Doctoral
dissertation). Boston University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
*Xiangming, L., Liu, M., & Zhang, C. (2020). Technological
impact on language anxiety dynamic. Computers &
Education, 150, 103839.
*Yang, Y. F., Hsieh, W. M., Wong, W. K., Hong, Y. C., & Lai, S. C. (2022). Reducing
students’ foreign language anxiety to improve English vocabulary learning in an online simulation
game. Computer Assisted Language Learning,
Ahead-of-print, 1–23.
*York, J., Shibata, K., Tokutake, H., & Nakayama, H. (2021). Effect
of SCMC on foreign language anxiety and learning experience: A comparison of voice, video, and VR-based oral
interaction. ReCALL, 33(1), 49–70.
*Zabihi, R., Mousavi, S. H., & Salehian, A. (2020). The
differential role of domain-specific anxiety in learners’ narrative and argumentative L2 written task
performances. Current
Psychology, 39(4), 1438–1444.
Zhang, X. (2019). Foreign
language anxiety and foreign language performance: A meta-analysis. The Modern
Language
Journal, 103(4), 763–781.
*Zhang, L. J., & Rahimi, M. (2014). EFL
learners’ anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication
classes. System, 42, 429–439.