References
Bell, H
(2003) Using frequency lists to assess L2 texts. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Swansea.Google Scholar
Crookes, G
(1989) Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daller, H., Van Hout, R., & Treffers-Daller, J
(2003) Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics, 24, 197–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeBot, K
(1992) A bilingual production model: Levelt's “Speaking” model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jong, N., Steinel, M.P., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J
(2012) The effect of task complexity on functional adequacy, fluency and lexical diversity in speaking performances of native and non-native speakers. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA (pp. 121–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C
(2003) Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, enhancement. In C. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. & Williams, J
(1998) Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp 197–262). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ellis, R
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2005) Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P
(2001) Lexical measures in task-based performance. Paper presented at the AAAL Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
Foster, P. & Skehan, P
(1996) The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 3, 299–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P
(2012) Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: a synthesis of the Ealing research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Anticipating a post-task activity: The effects on accuracy, complexity and fluency of L2 language performance. Canadian Modern Language Review 69, 3, 249–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G
(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354−75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Wigglesworth, G
(2010) Towards a new measure of accuracy in task-based second language performance. English Department, St.Mary’s University, Twickenham.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
(1975) Spoken and written language. Gelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F
(2009) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30, 461–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I
Kormos, J
(2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Nation, P
(1999) A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 33–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(1999) Language production: a blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of Language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Long, M.H
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Second Language Acquisition, (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, T
(2001) Seeing what they meant: transcribing as a route to noticing. English Language Teaching Journal, 55, 124–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Learning from the transcript of an oral communication task. English Language Teaching Journal, 61, 311–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L
(1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M., & Robinson, P
(1998) Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B
(2000) The CHILDES Project: Tools for analysing talk, Volume 1: Transcription format and programs (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Malvern, D., & Richards, B
(2002) Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 85–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., Myles, F., Rule, S., & Mitchell, R
(2003) Using CHILDES tools for researching second language acquisition. In S. Sarangi & T. van Leeuwen (Eds.), Applied Linguistics and Communities of Practice (Vol. 18, pp. 98–113). London: BAAL/Continuum.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B
(1980).Theory and research in second language learning: An emerging paradigm. Language Learning, 30, 331–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meara, P., & Bell, H
(2001) P_Lex: A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect, 16(3), 5–19.Google Scholar
Mehnert, U
(1998) The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L
(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L
(1995) The effect of planning on L2 Spanish narratives. Research Note 15 , Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
(1999) Planning and focus-on-form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Read, J
(2000) Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, B. & Malvern, D
(2007) Validity and threats to the validity of vocabulary measurement. In H. Daller, J. Milton, J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 79–92). Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P
(2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Rethinking-for-speaking and L2 task demands: The Cognition Hypothesis, task classification, and sequencing. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Task-based Language Teaching, University of Hawaii, September 2007.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R
(2007) Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 161–176.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., Cadierno, T., & Shirai, Y
(2009) Time and motion: Measuring the effects of the conceptual demands of tasks on second language speech production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 533–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P
(2011) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V
(2001) Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: the role of the teacher. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: second language learning, teaching, and testing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N
(2010) Cognitive bases of second language fluency. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Skehan, P
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2001) Tasks and language performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & Swain M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 167–185). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2009a) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Models of speaking and the assessment of second language proficiency. In A. Benati (Ed.), Issues in second language proficiency (pp. 202–215). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2011) Researching tasks: Performance, assessment, pedagogy. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Nurturing noticing. In J.M. Bergsleithner, S.N. Frota, & J.K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt. (pp. 169–180). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P
(1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49, 93–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan P., & Foster, P
(2005) Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P
(2005) Planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–273). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N
(1996) The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17, 84–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Lier, L. & Matsuo, N
(2000) Varieties of conversational experience: Looking for learning opportunities. Applied Language Learning, 11, 265–288.Google Scholar
Van Patten, B
(1990) Attending to content and form in the input: an experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K
(2006) Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis J
(1996) A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 28 other publications

Aaj, Ali, Parviz Maftoon & Masood Siyyari
2023. Do young EFL learners benefit from task repetition?. The Language Learning Journal  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Aubrey, Scott
2022. The relationship between anxiety, enjoyment, and breakdown fluency during second language speaking tasks: An idiodynamic investigation. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Aubrey, Scott, Craig Lambert & Paul Leeming
2022. The impact of first as opposed to second language pre-task planning on the content of problem-solving task performance. Language Teaching Research 26:5  pp. 867 ff. DOI logo
Awwad, Anas & Rashed Alhamad
2021. Online task planning and L2 oral fluency: does manipulating time pressure affect fluency in L2 monologic oral narratives? . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4  pp. 605 ff. DOI logo
Awwad, Anas & Rashed Alhamad
2021. Online task planning and L2 oral fluency: does manipulating time pressure affect fluency in L2 monologic oral narratives? . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4  pp. 605 ff. DOI logo
Awwad, Anas & Parvaneh Tavakoli
2022. Task complexity, language proficiency and working memory: Interaction effects on second language speech performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:2  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Bagheri, Mohammad
2024. The effects of task design variables and corrective feedback on EFL learners’ writing complexity and accuracy. Cogent Education 11:1 DOI logo
Bao, Gui
2023. Factor structures of speed and breakdown fluency in EFL learners’ story retelling performances. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:2  pp. 631 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Gavin, Peter Skehan & Zhan Wang
2018. Task Condition Effects on Advanced‐Level Foreign Language Performance. In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition,  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Dörnyei, Zoltán
2019. Chapter 3. Task motivation. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Ellis, Rod
2019. Chapter 1. Task preparedness. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Farahanynia, Mahsa & Mohammad Khatib
2022. Participatory structure of planning and cognitive task complexity in L2 oral performance: a processing perspective. The Language Learning Journal 50:6  pp. 777 ff. DOI logo
Fukuta, Junya, Yoshito Nishimura & Yu Tamura
2023. Pitfalls of production data analysis for investigating L2 cognitive mechanism. Journal of Second Language Studies 6:1  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Khoram, Alireza & Zuochen Zhang
2019. The impact of task type and pre-task planning condition on the accuracy of intermediate EFL learners’ oral performance. Cogent Education 6:1  pp. 1675466 ff. DOI logo
Lambert, Craig
2017. Tasks, affect and second language performance. Language Teaching Research 21:6  pp. 657 ff. DOI logo
Lambert, Craig, Scott Aubrey & Paul Leeming
2021. Task Preparation and Second Language Speech Production. TESOL Quarterly 55:2  pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Mayo, María del Pilar García & María Luquin
2023. Does repeated pre-task planning have an impact on form-focused LREs?. Language Teaching for Young Learners 5:2  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2024. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo
PANG, FRANCINE & PETER SKEHAN
2021. Performance Profiles on Second Language Speaking Tasks. The Modern Language Journal 105:1  pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Parsons, Daniel
2017. Formative assessment in discussion tasks. ELT Journal 71:1  pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Ryan, Jonathon, Pauline Foster, Anthea Fester, Yi Wang, Jenny Field, Celine Kearney & Jia Rong Yap
2023. First Language Literacy and Second Language Oracy: A Partial Replication of Foster and Skehan (1996). Language Learning 73:4  pp. 1003 ff. DOI logo
Saito, Kazuya
2019. To What Extent Does Long‐Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency?. TESOL Quarterly 53:1  pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Skehan, Peter, Gavin Bui, Zhan Wang & Sabrina Shum
2024. Re-examining accuracy measures in second language task-based spoken performance. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3:1  pp. 100098 ff. DOI logo
Souza Ferraz D'Ely, Raquel Carolina, Mailce Borges Mota & Martin Bygate
2019. Chapter 9. Strategic planning and repetition as metacognitive processes in task performance. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Tavakoli, Parvaneh
2019. Chapter 2. Automaticity, fluency and second language task performance. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Tavakoli, Parvaneh, Gill Kendon, Svetlana Mazhurnaya & Anna Ziomek
2023. Assessment of fluency in the Test of English for Educational Purposes. Language Testing 40:3  pp. 607 ff. DOI logo
Thai, Chau & Frank Boers
2016. Repeating a Monologue Under Increasing Time Pressure: Effects on Fluency, Complexity, and Accuracy. TESOL Quarterly 50:2  pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Weiwei & YouJin Kim
2020. The effect of topic familiarity on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency of second language writing . Applied Linguistics Review 11:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.