Anderson, J.R
(2004) Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.Google Scholar
Bruton, A
(2002) From tasking purposes to purposing tasks. English Language Teaching Journal, 56, 280–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M
(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks (pp. 23–48). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2006) Areas of research that influence L2 speaking instruction. In E. Uso-Juan & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 159–186). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate M., & Samuda V
(2009) Creating pressure in task pedagogy: The joint roles of field, purpose, and engagement within the interactional approach. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp. 90–116). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M
(Eds.) (2001) Researching pedagogic tasks. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Corder, S. Pit
(1981) Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Crookes, G
(1989) Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dornyei, Z
(2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ellis, R
(1987) Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P
(1996) The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M
(1983) On the surface of discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W
(1994) The psychology of discourse processing. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 721–740). San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kormos, J
(1999) Monitoring and self-repair. Language Learning, 49, 303–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(1999) Language production: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Li, Q
(2010) Focus on form in task based language teaching: exploring the effects of post-task activities and task practice on learners’ oral performance. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W
(2004) The task-based approach: Some problems and suggestions. English Language Teaching Journal, 58(4), 319–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H., & Crookes, G
(1992) Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R
(1993) Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P
(2009) Using priming methods in second language research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norris, J
(2009) Task-based teaching and testing. In M.H.Long & C.Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U
(1990) Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L
(2005) What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M
(2003) Language processing capacity. In C. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 679–714). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinter, A
(2005) Task repetition with a 10-year-old. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching (pp. 113–126). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P
(2001) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R
(2007) Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 161–176.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R
(1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P
(1986) Cluster analysis and the identification of learner types. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 81–94). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
(1989) Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2001) Tasks and language performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & Swain M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 167–185). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2007) Task research and language teaching: Reciprocal relationships. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 55–69). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2009a) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Models of speaking and the assessment of second language proficiency. In A. Benati (Ed.), Issues in second language proficiency (pp. 202–215). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2013) Nurturing noticing. In J. Bergleitner & S. Fotos (Eds.), Festschrift in honour of Richard Schmidt. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., Bei, X., Li, Q., & Wang Z
(2012) The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 170–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P
(1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 245–256). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Swan, M
(2005) Legislating by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26, 376–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D
(1989) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P
(2005) Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z
(2009) Modelling speech production and performance: Evidence from five types of planning and two task structures. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Willis, J
(1996) A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Willis, D., & Willis, J
(2007) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Winter, E
(1976) Fundamentals of information structure: A pilot manual for further development according to student need. Hatfield, Herts: The Hatfield Polytechnic Linguistics Group, School of Humanities.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 47 other publications

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud
2023. Unpacking the effects of different lengths of pre-task planning time: L2 writing outcomes and learners’ perceptions. The Language Learning Journal  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Gavin Bui & Yizhou Wang
2021. The effects of topic familiarity on emotionality and linguistic complexity in EAP writing. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882110335 ff. DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud & Yizhou Wang
2022. The effects of prompt types on L2 learners’ textual emotionality and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Studies 5:1  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Albert, Ágnes
2022. Language Tasks. In Investigating the Role of Affective Factors in Second Language Learning Tasks [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
B. Silva, Breno
2022. The Writing Cycle and Cognitive Processes that May Affect Learning. In Writing to Learn Academic Words [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
B. Silva, Breno
2022. General Discussion for Study 2 (Chapter 6) and Study 3 (Chapter 7). In Writing to Learn Academic Words [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
B. Silva, Breno
2022. Study 2—Incidental Lexical Learning Through Writing Sentences and Timed Compositions: Is Learning Affected by Task-Induced Cognitive Load?. In Writing to Learn Academic Words [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Alan V., Gregory L. Thompson & Troy L. Cox
2021. Chapter 3. ACTFL OPIc question prompt and advanced Spanish fluency. In Advancedness in Second Language Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 31],  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Gavin, Peter Skehan & Zhan Wang
2018. Task Condition Effects on Advanced‐Level Foreign Language Performance. In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition,  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
de Jong, Nel & Philip Tillman
2018. Chapter 2. Grammatical structures and oral fluency in immediate task repetition. In Learning Language through Task Repetition [Task-Based Language Teaching, 11],  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Duran-Karaoz, Zeynep & Parvaneh Tavakoli
2020. PREDICTING L2 FLUENCY FROM L1 FLUENCY BEHAVIOR. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:4  pp. 671 ff. DOI logo
Ellis, Rod
2019. Chapter 1. Task preparedness. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Jiang, Michael Yi‐Chao, Morris Siu‐Yung Jong, Wilfred Wing‐Fat Lau, Ching‐Sing Chai & Na Wu
2023. Exploring the effects of automatic speech recognition technology on oral accuracy and fluency in a flipped classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 39:1  pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Khezrlou, Sima
2020. Training planning in second language narrative writing. ELT Journal 74:1  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Khezrlou, Sima
2023. Focus on form in task repetition through oral and written task modeling. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:2  pp. 479 ff. DOI logo
Kim, YouJin, Scott Crossley, YeonJoo Jung, Kristopher Kyle & Sanghee Kang
2018. Chapter 3. The effects of task repetition and task complexity on L2 lexicon use. In Learning Language through Task Repetition [Task-Based Language Teaching, 11],  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Kobayashi, Manami
2022. The distributed practice effects of speaking task repetition. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1  pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Kourtali, Nektaria-Efstathia & Lais Borges
2023. The effects of feedback timing on L2 development in written SCMC. Computer Assisted Language Learning  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kourtali, Nektaria‐Efstathia & Andrea Révész
2020. The Roles of Recasts, Task Complexity, and Aptitude in Child Second Language Development. Language Learning 70:1  pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Lambert, Craig, Judit Kormos & Danny Minn
2017. TASK REPETITION AND SECOND LANGUAGE SPEECH PROCESSING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:1  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Matsumoto, Kazumi, Maki Hirotani & Atsushi Fukada
2020. Examining Oral Performance Characteristics of L2 Learners With the CAF Calculator. In Recent Tools for Computer- and Mobile-Assisted Foreign Language Learning [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],  pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Mohammadzadeh, Aysheh, Touran Ahour, Mahnaz Saeidi & María Consuelo Sáiz Manzanares
2020. A Sociocultural Perspective on Second Language Writing: The Effect of Symmetrical versus Asymmetrical Scaffolding on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy, Fluency, and Complexity and Their Attitudes. Education Research International 2020  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2024. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo
2021. Performance Profiles on Second Language Speaking Tasks. The Modern Language Journal 105:1  pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Rahimi, Muhammad
2019. Effects of increasing the degree of reasoning and the number of elements on L2 argumentative writing. Language Teaching Research 23:5  pp. 633 ff. DOI logo
Rahimi, Muhammad & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2019. Writing task complexity, students’ motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in English as a second language. Reading and Writing 32:3  pp. 761 ff. DOI logo
Rezaei, Amir & Antonella Valeo
2023. Investigating the impact of task complexity on uptake and noticing of corrective feedback recasts. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:4  pp. 1271 ff. DOI logo
Ryan, Jonathon, Pauline Foster, Anthea Fester, Yi Wang, Jenny Field, Celine Kearney & Jia Rong Yap
2023. First Language Literacy and Second Language Oracy: A Partial Replication of Foster and Skehan (1996). Language Learning 73:4  pp. 1003 ff. DOI logo
Sasayama, Shoko & John M. Norris
2019. Chapter 5. Unravelling cognitive task complexity. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Silva, Breno B., Katarzyna Kutyłowska & Agnieszka Otwinowska
2024. Learning academic words through writing sentences and compositions: Any signs of an increase in cognitive load?. Language Teaching Research 28:3  pp. 1143 ff. DOI logo
Skehan, Peter
2016. Sidesteps towards applied linguistics. In Becoming and Being an Applied Linguist,  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Skehan, Peter
2016. Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 3],  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Skehan, Peter
2016. Tasks Versus Conditions: Two Perspectives on Task Research and Their Implications for Pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Souza Ferraz D'Ely, Raquel Carolina, Mailce Borges Mota & Martin Bygate
2019. Chapter 9. Strategic planning and repetition as metacognitive processes in task performance. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Tao, Na & Ying Wang
2022. Effects of prior knowledge and reasoning demands on Chinese EFL writing performance. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882210898 ff. DOI logo
Tavakoli, Parvaneh, Colin Campbell & Joan McCormack
2016. Development of Speech Fluency Over a Short Period of Time: Effects of Pedagogic Intervention. TESOL Quarterly 50:2  pp. 447 ff. DOI logo
2020. Aspects of Fluency Across Assessed Levels of Speaking Proficiency. The Modern Language Journal 104:1  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Tran, Mai Ngoc & Kazuya Saito
2024. Effects of the 4/3/2 activity revisited: Extending Boers (2014) and Thai & Boers (2016). Language Teaching Research 28:2  pp. 326 ff. DOI logo
Van den Branden, Kris & Koen Van Gorp
2021. Implementing task-based language education in primary education. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Vandeweerd, Nathan, Alex Housen & Magali Paquot
2023. Comparing the longitudinal development of phraseological complexity across oral and written tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:4  pp. 787 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Zhan, Peter Skehan & Gaowei Chen
2019. The effects of hybrid online planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 3:1  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Xing, Jiaxin
2023. How do EFL learners process oral tasks with different complexity: an exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Xing, Jiaxin & Shaoqian Luo
Yenkimaleki, Mahmood, Vincent Van Heuven & Mostafa Hosseini
2022. The Effect of Fluency Training on Interpreter Trainees’ Speech Fluency: Does Content Familiarity Matter?. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Yenkimaleki, Mahmood & Vincent J. van Heuven
2024. The effect of fluency training on interpreter trainees’ speech fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics DOI logo
2021. Effects of Task Complexity on Text Easibility and Coherence of EFL Learners’ Narrative Writing. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 11:1  pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Ying
2023. The Influence of Game-Enhanced Communication on EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Competence in Compliment Responses. Applied Linguistics DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.