This chapter reports on an action research study conducted in the context of English as a foreign language (EFL) tertiary education in Mexico. It examines the educational value of blending technology into a task-based instruction module that was designed around a pre-during-post-task model, following the main tenets of task-based language teaching (Ellis 2003; Van den Branden,Bygate & Norris 2009). The participants were three intact classes of pre-intermediate-level EFL students at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) who completed 8 two-hour classes on a module of their textbook targeting grammar learning (simple past, past continuous, and used to). The module culminated with a writing activity, which served as the springboard for the design of an innovative Story Telling Contest task online. At the end of the textbook module, Group A (N = 25) engaged in this task-based, technology-mediated instructional design, Group B (N = 23) experienced the same task-based design but with no digital tools, and Group C (N = 25) did the writing activity in the original design offered in the textbook. The three groups were compared by collecting student perceptions through questionnaires and by measuring grammar learning via a pre- and post-test of narrative past tense use. A subset of 7 learners who experienced the task with the support of technology was also interviewed a few months later. The triangulated evidence suggests that, while all three instructional approaches led to similar linguistic gains in the use of narrative tenses, Groups A and B perceived the task design to have helped them develop rich new competencies, more so than the technological element. Students in Group A reported some additional value in the technology-mediated TBLT experience, including the improvement of their digital skills and the easy delivery of instructional material to carry out the task. This action research study contributes to the understanding of ways in which a task mediated by digital tools can enhance language learning in the context of traditional textbook-bound curricula.
American Council of the Teaching of Foreign Languages [ACTFL]. (1999). Proficiency guidelines revised. Yonkers, NY: Author.
Council of Europe Modern Languages Division Strasbourg. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment [CEFR]. Cambridge, UK: CUP.
Cunningham, S., & Moor, P. (2004). American cutting edge. Level 4. Teachers’ resource book (1st ed.). Hong Kong: Longman Asia ELT.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Longman.
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50–80.
Ducate, L. C., & Lomicka, L. L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 9–28.
Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: OUP.
Hedge, T. (1998). Writing. Oxford, UK: OUP.
Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40, 243–249.
Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–99). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Long, M. H., & Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram (Ed.), Encyclopoedia of language teaching(pp. 597–603). London, UK: Routledge.
Murray, L., & Hourigan, T. (2008). Blogs for specific purposes: Expressivist or socio-cognitivist approach? ReCALL, 20, 82–97.
Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-Based teaching and testing. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Malden, MA: Wiley/Blackwell.
Salaberry, M. R. (2000). Pedagogical design of computer mediated communication tasks: Learning objectives and technological capabilities. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 28–37.
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
Schmidt, R. W. (2010). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chan, S. Chi, K. N. Cin, J. Istanto, M. Nagami, J. W. Sew, T. Suthiwan & I. Walker (Eds.),
Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010, Singapore, December 2-4
(pp. 721–737). Singapore: National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. (2003). Focus on form, task and technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 391–411.
Solares, M. E. (2010). Promoting teacher professional development through online task-based instruction. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 1(4), 52–65.
Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26, 376–401.
Thomas, M. & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2010). Task-Based language learning and teaching with technology. London, UK: Continuum.
Vale, D., & Feunteun, A. (1995). Teaching children. A training course for teachers of English to children. Cambridge, UK: CUP.
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. M. (Eds.). (2009). Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vandergrift, L. (2006). New Canadian perspectives: Proposal for a common framework of reference for languages for Canada. Retrieved from [URL]
Waters, A. (2009, September). Tasks in textbooks: barking up the wrong tree? Paper presented at the 3rd Biennial Conference on Task-based Language Teaching, Lancaster University, UK.
Willis, J., & Leaver, B. (Eds.). (2004). Task-based instruction in foreign language education. Practices and programs. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
MAVİLİ, Selin & Günizi KARTAL
2022. Technology Integration Designed to Scaffold 5th Graders in Task-Based Language Teaching. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 18:3 ► pp. 301 ff.
Chen, Kate Tzu-Ching
2021. The Effects of Technology-Mediated TBLT on Enhancing the Speaking Abilities of University Students in a Collaborative EFL Learning Environment
. Applied Linguistics Review 12:2 ► pp. 331 ff.
Bolgün, M. Ali & Tatiana McCaw
2019. Toward a neuroscience-informed evaluation of language technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning 32:3 ► pp. 294 ff.
Keim, Lucrecia
2015. Critical CALL – Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, Padova, Italy, ► pp. 294 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.