Cover not available
Part of
Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching Technology and Tasks
Edited by Marta González-Lloret and Lourdes Ortega
[Task-Based Language Teaching 6] 2014
► pp. 115–148

Chapter 5. Promoting foreign language collaborative writing through the use of Web 2.0 tools and tasks

This chapter reports on the benefits of embedding chats and wikis, two Web 2.0 social tools, within a module designed to teach the process model of writing with argumentative and expository essays. Sixteen learners enrolled in an advanced Spanish writing course at a mid-sized, east-coast university in the United States completed two three-week essay writing modules working collaboratively in pairs: the first writing piece was in the argumentative genre and the second concerned expository writing. In each module, the same sequence of pedagogic tasks scaffolded the learners through the writing stages of planning, drafting, getting feedback, revising, and publishing. Students were asked to use chats and wikis at specific points during the completion of the modules. Content analysis of the chat and wiki data showed that the synchronous nature of the chats encouraged learners to focus on the content and structure of their writing, while the wikis allowed learners to focus more on localized aspects of text production, such as grammar, fine-tuning of chosen vocabulary, and editing. Comparison of data across the two genres further indicated that while working on the argumentative essay learners focused on syntactic complexity, whereas for the expository essay (completed later in the same semester) learners focused more on accuracy. We conclude that the task-based collaborative approach to teaching process writing, with the mediation of the social tools, allowed learners to construct and reconstruct their content knowledge, to engage with various writing conventions, and to adopt an appropriate, genre-specific language register.
Published online: 24 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.6.05osk
References (73)
References
Apple, G., & Lantolf, J. (1994). Speaking as mediation: A study of L1 and L2 text recall tasks. Modern Language Journal , 78, 437–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. (2009). Collaborative writing in wikis: Insights from culture projects in German classes. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), CALICO Monograph Series: Vol. 5. The next generation: Social 4. Networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 115–144). San Marcos, TX: Texas State University.Google Scholar
Beck, S. W., & Jeffery, J. V. (2009). Genre and thinking in academic writing tasks. Journal of Literacy Research , 41, 228–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Nir-Sagiv, B. (2007). Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes , 43, 79–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blin, F., & Appel, C. (2011). Computer supported collaborative writing in practice: An activity theoretical study. CALICO Journal , 28, 473–497.Google Scholar
Bosley, D. S. (1989). A national study of the uses of collaborative writing in business communication courses among members of the ABC (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Illinois State University, Normal, IL.Google Scholar
Breen, M. P. (1987). Learner contributions to task design. In C. N. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks. Lancaster practical papers in English language education, Volume 7 (pp. 23–46). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Brooks, F., & Donato, R. (1994). Vygotskyan approaches to understanding foreign language learner discourse during communication tasks. Hispania , 77, 262–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandt, D. (2005). Writing for a living: Literacy and the knowledge economy. Written Communication , 22, 166–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ciekanski, M., & Chanier, T. (2008). Developing online multimodal verbal communication to enhance the writing process in an audio-graphic conferencing environment. ReCALL , 20, 162–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, D. J., White, S., & Cohen, S. B. (2011). A time use diary study of adult everyday writing behavior. Written Communication , 28, 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coffin, C. (2009). Contemporary educational argumentation: A multimodal perspective. Argumentation , 23, 513–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coffin, C., Hewings, A., & North, S. (2012). Arguing as an academic purpose: The role of asynchronous conferencing in supporting argumentative dialogue in school and university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 11, 38–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding on second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Apple (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Westport, CT: Ablex. Google Scholar
deHaan, J., Johnson, N. H., Yosimura, N., & Kondo, Y. (2012). Wiki and digital video use in strategic interaction-based experiential EFL learning. CALICO Journal , 29, 249–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Oliveira, L. C. (2011). Knowing and writing school history: The language of students' expository writing and teachers' expectations . Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching . Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010a). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology , 14(3), 30–49.Google Scholar
2010b). A social learning approach to writing in the FL classroom: Adopting new pedagogical approaches through the use of online components. In G. Levine & A. Phipps (Eds.), Critical and intercultural theory and language pedagogy (pp. 185–201). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication , 32, 365–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL , 18, 105–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R., & Hauck, M. (2006). Computer-mediated language learning: Making meaning in multimodal virtual learning spaces. The JALT CALL Journal , 2(2), 3–18.Google Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, L., & Mathias, S. P. (1994). Examining expert judgments of task difficulty on essay tests. Journal of Second Language Writing , 3, 49–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillocks, G. Jr. (2011). Teaching argument writing: Supporting claims with relevant evidence and clear reasoning . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hirvela, A. (1999). Collaborative writing: Instruction and communities of readers and writers. TESOL Journal , 8, 7–12.Google Scholar
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009) Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics , 30, 461–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunt, W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Karlsson, A.-M. (2009). Positioned by reading and writing: Literacy practices, roles, and genres in common occupations. Written Communication , 26, 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology , 13(1), 79–95.Google Scholar
Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous language learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning , 23, 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). A theory of discourse. Englewood Cliffs , NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182–202). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kost, C. (2011). Investigating writing strategies and revision behavior in collaborative wiki projects. CALICO Journal , 28, 606–620.Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing , 17, 48–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latif, M. (2009). Toward a new process-based indicator for measuring writing fluency: Evidence from L2 writers’ think-aloud protocols. The Canadian Modern Language Review , 65, 531–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, L. (2007). Fostering L2 oral communication through constructivist interaction in desktop video conferencing. Foreign Language Annals , 40, 635–649. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010). Exploring wiki-media collaborative writing: A case study in an elementary Spanish course. CALICO Journal , 27, 260–276. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M. (Ed.). (2009). Learning, teaching, and researching writing in foreign language contexts . Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007 . Retrieved from <[URL]Google Scholar
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Newell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., VanDerHeide, J., DeannaKuhn, & Andriessen, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46 , 273–304.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 Computer-assisted Classroom Discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1, 82–93.Google Scholar
2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics , 24, 492–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005). What do learners learn? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009). Interaction and attention to form in L2 text-based computer-mediated communication. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction in SLA: Research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 226–253). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2011). Meeting at the wiki: The new arena for collaborative writing in foreign language courses. In M. J. W. Lee & C. MacLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 209–227). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
2012). Understanding the impact of social tools in the FL writing classroom: Activity theory at work. In G. Kessler, A. Oskoz, & Elola, I. (Eds.), Technology across writing contexts and tasks (pp. 131–154). San Marcos, TX: Texas State University.Google Scholar
Pellet, S. (2012). Wikis for building content knowledge in the foreign language classroom. CALICO Journal , 29, 224–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichelt, M. (2009). A critical evaluation of writing teaching programmes in different foreign language settings. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts (pp. 183–208). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics , 22, 27–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R. M., & Murphy, L. (2006). Generating text in native and foreign language writing: A temporal analysis of formulation processes. Modern Language Journal , 90, 100–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sasaki, M., & Hirose, K. (1996). Explanatory variables for EFL students’ expository writing. Language Learning , 46, 137–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauro, S. (2011). SCMC for SLA: A research synthesis. CALICO Journal , 28, 369–391.Google Scholar
Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2010). Investigating L2 performance in text chat. Applied Linguistics , 31, 554–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning . Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge, UK: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spelman Miller, K. (2000). Academic writers on-line: Investigating pausing in the production of text. Language Teaching Research , 4, 123–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sykes, J. (2005). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal , 22, 399–432.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 97–114). Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Lanxguage Learning and Technology , 7(2), 38–67.Google Scholar
Tobin, L. (2001). Process pedagogy. In G. Tate, A. Rupiper & K. Schick (Eds.), A guide to composition pedagogies (pp. 1–18). Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
van Weijen, D. (2009). Writing processes, text quality, and task effects: Empirical studies in first and second language writing . (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from LPT Dissertation Series. (201)Google Scholar
Victori, M. (1999). An analysis of written knowledge in EFL composing: A case study of two effective and two less effective writers. System , 27, 537–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. (2007). Task design in videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. CALICO Journal , 24, 591–630.Google Scholar
Ware, P. D., & O’Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology , 12(1), 43–63. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
White, S., Chen, J., & Forsyth, B. (2010). Reading-related literacy activities of American adults: Time spent, task types, and cognitive skills used. Journal of Literacy Research , 42, 276–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitley, M. S., & González, L. (2000). Gramática para la composición. Washington , DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry , 17, 89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yanguas, I. (2010). Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time! Language Learning & Technology , 14(3), 72–93.Google Scholar
Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly , 16, 195–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (30)

Cited by 30 other publications

George, Angela & Hortensia Barrios
2024. Teaching language attitudes through digital storytelling projects. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Morgana, Valentina
2024. Fostering English speaking and writing subskills for the Cambridge B2 First through technology-mediated tasks. ReCALL 36:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Namkung, Yoon & YouJin Kim
2024. A review of learner motivation and engagement research in task-based language teaching. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 198 ff. DOI logo
Papin, Kevin & Gabriel Michaud
2024. Learners’ Perceptions of Synchronous Written Corrective Feedback in Videoconferenced Collaborative Writing. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 49:3 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tarchi, Christian, Alessandra Zappoli, Lidia Casado Ledesma & Eva Wennås Brante
2024. The Use of ChatGPT in Source-Based Writing Tasks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education DOI logo
Gomez Laich, Maria Pia & Naoko Taguchi
2023. Effects of task complexity on the learning of genre specific rhetorical moves and linguistic forms: the case of contrast and argumentative essays. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:2 ► pp. 571 ff. DOI logo
Li, Mimi & Meixiu Zhang
2023. Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms: A research agenda. Language Teaching 56:1 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Bueno‐Alastuey, Mª Camino, Raychel Vasseur & Idoia Elola
2022. Effects of collaborative writing and peer feedback on Spanish as a foreign language writing performance. Foreign Language Annals 55:2 ► pp. 517 ff. DOI logo
Charoenchaikorn, Vararin
2022. Prewriting in Voice Chat: Exploring the Effects of Collaborative Prewriting on EFL Learners’ Performance. rEFLections 29:2 ► pp. 278 ff. DOI logo
Isla-Montes, José-Luis, Anke Berns, Manuel Palomo-Duarte & Juan-Manuel Dodero
2022. Redesigning a Foreign Language Learning Task Using Mobile Devices: A Comparative Analysis between the Digital and Paper-Based Outcomes. Applied Sciences 12:11 ► pp. 5686 ff. DOI logo
Korkmazgil, Sibel
2022. Technology-Enhanced Genre-Based Writing. In New Directions in Technology for Writing Instruction [English Language Education, 30], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
MAVİLİ, Selin & Günizi KARTAL
2022. Technology Integration Designed to Scaffold 5th Graders in Task-Based Language Teaching. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 18:3 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Nusrat, Aasia, Sardaraz Khan, Farah Kashif & Rakhshanda Fawad
2022. Effect of teachers’ asynchronous e-feedback and synchronous oral feedback on English language learners’ writing accuracy. Frontiers in Education 7 DOI logo
Chen, Kate Tzu-Ching
2021. The Effects of Technology-Mediated TBLT on Enhancing the Speaking Abilities of University Students in a Collaborative EFL Learning Environment . Applied Linguistics Review 12:2 ► pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Cunningham, D. Joseph
2021. Adapting an Undergraduate Multiliteracies German Curriculum for Online Instruction During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Íkala 26:3 ► pp. 749 ff. DOI logo
Jiang, Dayu, Slava Kalyuga & John Sweller
2021. Comparing face-to-face and computer-mediated collaboration when teaching EFL writing skills. Educational Psychology 41:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Dobao, Ana
2020. Exploring interaction between heritage and second language learners in the Spanish language classroom. In Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 55], ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Mizza, Daria & Fernando Rubio
2020. Creating Effective Blended Language Learning Courses, DOI logo
Aldrich, Rosalie S. & Dianne Moneypenny
2019. Assessing Spanish Proficiency of Online Language Learners after Year 1. The EuroCALL Review 27:2 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Henry, Alastair
2019. Online Media Creation and L2 Motivation: A Socially Situated Perspective. TESOL Quarterly 53:2 ► pp. 372 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Le, Yi Luo & Pengpeng Feng
2019. Exploring Pre-Service Teachers' Developmental Trajectories of Digital Literacies. In Recent Developments in Technology-Enhanced and Computer-Assisted Language Learning [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 316 ff. DOI logo
Kim, YouJin & David Lawrence Chiesa
2018. Task Development: Collaborative Writing. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
González‐Lloret, Marta
2017. Technology for Task‐based Language Teaching. In The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning, ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Romeo, Kenneth, Elizabeth B. Bernhardt, Alice Miano & Cici Malik Leffell
2017. Exploring Blended Learning in a Postsecondary Spanish Language Program: Observations, Perceptions, and Proficiency Ratings. Foreign Language Annals 50:4 ► pp. 681 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Le, Pengpeng Feng & Jing Chen
2017. Pre-Service Teachers' Development of Digital Literacies. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 7:3 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Blake, Robert
2016. Distance Education for Second and Foreign Language Learning. In Language and Technology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Blake, Robert
2017. Distance Education for Second and Foreign Language Learning. In Language, Education and Technology, ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Elola, Idoia & Ana Oskoz
2016. Supporting Second Language Writing Using Multimodal Feedback. Foreign Language Annals 49:1 ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
Elola, Idoia & Ana Oskoz
2023. Sociocultural approaches to L2 digital collaborative writing. In L2 Collaborative Writing in Diverse Learning Contexts [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 59], ► pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
Ziegler, Nicole
2016. Taking Technology to Task: Technology-Mediated TBLT, Performance, and Production. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.