Cover not available
Part of
Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching Technology and Tasks
Edited by Marta González-Lloret and Lourdes Ortega
[Task-Based Language Teaching 6] 2014
► pp. 213–238

Chapter 8. The third dimension

A sociocultural theory approach to the design and evaluation of 3D virtual worlds tasks

This chapter describes a theoretical framework for the design and evaluation of pedagogical tasks for 3D virtual world environments. The proposed framework is informed by Vygotskian Sociocultural Theory (SCT) and Activity Theory, two related sociocultural approaches to second (L2) language learning which, I argue, offer a particularly suitable paradigm for the design, implementation, and evaluation of technology-mediated tasks. Firstly, I provide an overview of what characterises 3D virtual worlds (3D VWs) and of current research into the potential of this technological application in the service of second language learning and teaching, and the range of tasks that this research has thus far inspected. Secondly, I briefly review core SCT concepts underlying the proposed framework and point out how they apply to 3D VW tasks. I then identify pedagogical principles derived from this approach to L2 learning and discuss their relevance in the context of technology-mediated task-based language teaching (TBLT) with specific reference to the current state and capabilities of 3D VWs. I also outline a task example designed to capitalise on the potential of 3D VWs for L2 learning. I conclude with a proposal for the application of Activity Theory to the evaluation of 3D VWs tasks. At a theoretical level, my goal in the chapter is to bring key sociocultural perspectives to TBLT and show how SCT can inform theoretically sound pedagogical design in TBLT. At a practical level, I hope to offer a framework for practitioners to support the design and evaluation of technology-mediated tasks in general and 3D VWs tasks in particular.
Published online: 24 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.6.08gan
References (73)
References
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal , 78, 465–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brooks, L., Swain, M., Lapkin, S., & Knouzi, I. (2010). Mediating between scientific and spontaneous concepts through languaging. Language Awareness , 19, 89–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2006). What kind of resource is language and why does it matter for advanced language learning? An introduction. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 1–28). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cobb, S. C. (2009). Social presence and online learning: A current view from a research perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning , 8, 241–254.Google Scholar
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. A. (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of SLA tasks from an Activity Theory perspective. In P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173–194). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Daniels, H. (2007). Pedagogy. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 307–331). Cambridge, UK: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, G. (2009). Preface. In J. Molka-Danielsen & M. Deutschmann (Eds.), Learning and teaching in the virtual world of Second Life (pp. 3–6). Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.Google Scholar
de Guerrero, M.C. M. (2005). Inner speech – L2: Thinking words in a second language . Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deutschmann, M., & Panichi, L. (2009). Instructional design, teacher practice and learner autonomy. In J. Molka-Danielsen & M. Deutschmann (Eds.), Learning and teaching in the virtual world of Second Life (pp. 27–43). Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.Google Scholar
Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L., & Molka-Danielsen, J. (2009). Designing oral participation in Second Life: A comparative study of two language proficiency courses. ReCALL , 21, 206–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
del Río, P., & Álvarez, A. (2007). Inside and outside the Zone of Proximal Development: An ecofunctional reading of Vygotsky. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 276–303). Cambridge, UK: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and second language learning (pp. 27–50). Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research . Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
2001). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work , 14, 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A. (2008). Microgenesis, method and object: A study of collaborative activity in a Spanish as a foreign language classroom. Applied Linguistics , 29, 120–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009). Repetition, use of L1, and reading aloud as mediational mechanisms during collaborative activity at the computer. Computer Assisted Language Learning , 22, 323–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., & Harun, H. (2011). Verbalization as a mediational tool for understanding tense/aspect marking in English: An application of Concept-Based Instruction. Language Awareness , 20, 99–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, M., Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., Scott, J., Horan, B., & Callaghan, V. (2011). Immersive education spaces using Open Wonderland: From pedagogy through to practice. In G. Vincenti & J. Braman (Eds.), Multi-user virtual environments for the classroom: Practical approaches to teaching in virtual worlds (pp. 190–205). Hershey, NJ: IGI. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, M., Gánem-Gutiérrez, A., & Scott, J. (2010). SIMiLLE Good practice guide . Project funded by a JISC Learning and Teaching Innovations Grant. University of Essex, UK.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course ( 3 rd ed. ). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ho, C.M. L. (2010). What’s in a question? The case of students’ enactments in the Second Life virtual world. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching , 4, 151–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ho, C.M. L., Rappa, N. A., & Chee, Y. S. (2009). Designing and implementing virtual enactive role-play and structured argumentation: Promises and pitfalls. Computer Assisted Language Learning , 22, 381–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jauregi, K., & de Graaff, R. (2009). Communicative tasks for language students and teacher trainees in video web communication and virtual worlds. In N. Brouwer, B. Giesbers, B. Rienties & L. van Gastel (Eds.), Proceedings of student mobility and ICT: Dimensions of transition (pp. 191–200). Maastricht: FEVA ERD Press.Google Scholar
Jauregi, K., Canto, S., de Graaff, R., Koenraad, T., & Moonen, M. (2011). Verbal interaction in Second Life: Towards a pedagogic framework for task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning , 24, 77–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knouzi, I., Swain, M., Lapkin, S., & Brooks, L. (2010). Self-scaffolding mediated by languaging: Microgenetic analysis of high and low performers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics , 20, 23–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koenraad, A.L. M. (2007). 3D and language education . [White paper] on the rationale for the ViTAAL project. Retrieved from <[URL]>Google Scholar
Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer interaction (pp. 17–44). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lafford, B. (2009). Toward an ecological CALL: Update to Garrett (1991). Modern Language Journal , 93, 673–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (2008). Praxis and classroom L2 development. Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada , 8, 13–44.Google Scholar
2004). Sociocultural theory and second and foreign language learning: An overview of sociocultural theory. In K. van Esch & O. St. John (Eds.), New insights into foreign language and teaching (pp. 13–34). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Johnson, K. E. (2007). Extending Firth and Wagner’s (1997) ontological perspective to L2 classroom praxis and teacher education. The Modern Language Journal , 91, 877–892. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141–158). London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics , 1, 49–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. In B. van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 201–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development . Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
Lapkin, S. M., Swain, M., & Knouzi I. (2008). Postsecondary French as a second language students learn the grammatical concept of voice: study design, materials development, and pilot data. In J. P. Lantolf & M. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 228–255). London, UK: Equinox.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring . Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Lavelli, M., Pantoja, A.P. F., Hsu, H., Messinger, D., & Fogel, A. (2005). Using microgenetic designs to study change processes. In D. M. Teti (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in developmental science (pp. 40–65). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories ( 2 nd ed. ). London, UK: Arnold.Google Scholar
Müller-Hartmann, A., & Schocker-von Ditfurth, M. (2010). Research on the use of technology in Task-Based Language Teaching. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology (pp. 17–40). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Negueruela, E. (2008). Revolutionary pedagogies: Learning that leads (to) second language development. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 189–227). London, UK: Equinox.Google Scholar
Negueruela, E., & Lantolf, J. (2006). Concept-based pedagogy and the acquisition of L2 Spanish. In R. Salaberry & R. Lafford (Eds.), Spanish second language acquisition: From research to application (pp. 79–102). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Malden, MA: Wiley/Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. (2006). Learner interaction management in an avatar and chat-based virtual world. Computer Assisted Language Learning , 19, 79–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010). Learner participation patterns and strategy use in Second Life: an exploratory case study. ReCALL , 22, 273–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011). Towards a research agenda for the use of three-dimensional virtual worlds in language learning. CALICO Journal , 29, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012). EFL learner collaborative interaction in Second Life. ReCALL , 24, 20–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research , 9, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinders, H., & White C. (2010). The theory and practice of technology in materials development and task design. In N. Harwood (Ed.), Materials in ELT: Theory and Practice (pp. 58–80). Cambridge, UK: CUP.Google Scholar
Robbins, D. (2001). Vygotsky's psychology-philosophy: A metaphor for language theory and learning . New York,NY: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rymaszewski, M., Wagner, J., Ondrejka, C., Platel, R., Van Gorden, S., Cézanne, J., Cézanne, P., Batstone-Cunningham, B., Krotoski, A., Trollop, C., & Rossignol, J. (2008). Second Life: The official guide . Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.Google Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning . Houndmillls, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition . Cambridge, UK: CUP.Google Scholar
Schwienhorst, K. (2008). Learner autonomy and CALL environments . New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications . London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes(Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., & Brooks, L. (2009). Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. Modern Language Journal , 93, 6–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sykes, J. M., Oskoz, A., & Thorne, S. L. (2008). Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. CALICO Journal , 25, 528–546.Google Scholar
Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context . Cambridge, UK: CUP.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2008). Transcultural communication in open Internet environments and massively multiplayer online games. In S. S. Magnan (Ed.), Mediating discourse online (pp. 305–327). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004). Cultural historical activity theory and the object of innovation. In K. van Esch & O. St. John (Eds.), New insights into foreign language and teaching (pp. 51–70). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2000). Second language acquisition theory and the truth (s) about relativity. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 219–244). Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. M. (Eds.). (2009). Task-based language teaching: A reader . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–188). London, UK: Equinox.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1997a). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology. Including the volume thinking and speech . R. W. Reiber & A. S. Carton ( Eds.). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
1997b). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 4. The History of the Development of Higher Mental Functions . R. W. Reiber & A. S. Carton (Eds.). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zheng, D., Wagner, M., Young, M. F., & Brewer, R. A. (2009a). Negotiation for action: English language learning in game-based virtual worlds. The Modern Language Journal , 93, 489–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zheng, D., Young, M. F., Brewer, R. A., & Wagner, M. (2009b). Attitude and self-efficacy change: English language learning in virtual worlds. CALICO Journal , 27, 205–231.Google Scholar
Cited by (33)

Cited by 33 other publications

Li, Jiantao, Qingjia Kou & Mohammad Mosiur Rahman
2023. Designing Tasks through Second Life for CFL Learners in the UK University. Education Research International 2023 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Julian ChengChiang
2021. The interplay of avatar identities, self-efficacy, and language practices. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 44:1 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Kozlova, Iryna
2021. Framework for 3D Task Design. In Implementing Augmented Reality Into Immersive Virtual Learning Environments [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Kozlova, Iryna
2022. Framework for 3D Task Design. In Research Anthology on Virtual Environments and Building the Metaverse, ► pp. 570 ff. DOI logo
Ellis, Rod, Peter Skehan, Shaofeng Li, Natsuko Shintani & Craig Lambert
2019. Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Peterson, Mark, Qiao Wang & Maryam Sadat Mirzaei
2019. The Use of Network-Based Virtual Worlds in Second Language Education. In Assessing the Effectiveness of Virtual Technologies in Foreign and Second Language Instruction [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Peterson, Mark, Qiao Wang & Maryam Sadat Mirzaei
2022. The Use of Network-Based Virtual Worlds in Second Language Education. In Research Anthology on Virtual Environments and Building the Metaverse, ► pp. 218 ff. DOI logo
Vivakaran, Mangale Vadivu & Neelamalar Maraimalai
2018. The Feasibility and Acceptance of Social Media Interventions in Higher Education Classrooms of Developing Nations with Special Reference to India. Contemporary Educational Technology 9:3 ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Canto, Silvia & Kristi Jauregi Ondarra
2017. Language learning effects through the integration of synchronous online communication: The case of video communication and Second Life. Language Learning in Higher Education 7:1 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
González‐Lloret, Marta
2017. Technology for Task‐based Language Teaching. In The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning, ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Comparative Method Studies. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 283 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Task-Based Syllabus Design. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Psycholinguistic Perspectives. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Questions, Challenges and the Future. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Introduction. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Investigating Task-Based Programmes. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Pedagogical Perspectives. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Index. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 412 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Cognitive-Interactionist Perspectives. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Responding to the Critics of Task-Based Language Teaching. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Authors’ Preface. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. xiii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Task-Based Testing and Assessment. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Educational Perspectives. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. References. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 374 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Theoretical Perspectives. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Moving Forward. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Series Editors’ Preface. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Methodology of Task-Based Language Teaching. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Psychological Perspectives. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Sociocultural Perspectives. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Endnotes. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. The Pedagogic Background to Task-Based Language Teaching. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Evaluating Task-Based Language Teaching. In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.