Cover not available
Part of
Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 8] 2015
► pp. 193–224

Linking ‘task’ and curricular thinking

An affirmation of the TBLT educational agenda

 | Georgetown University
The article argues that an important challenge for TBLT, as a fundamentally education-oriented effort within language teaching and learning studies, is to arrive at a foundation for the construct of ‘task’ that captures its holistic understanding of language, language use, and language learning in a way that goes beyond affirming its orientation toward communication. If the construct of task is to facilitate learners’ ability to expand their meaning-making capacities in oral and written discourse, attaining that goal will require a repositioning of ‘task’ in a number of fundamental ways. The article highlights and discusses the opportunities for doing so by embedding task into a framework that is genre-oriented in its curricular thinking and task-based in its pedagogical manifestations. Specifically, it identifies parameters for curriculum development that would support fundamental TBLT interests; describes impediments to curricular thinking that must be overcome; introduces an understanding of curriculum that is suited to being translated into educational contexts; and offers a set of considerations that can provide the foundation for curriculum development. Ideally, these new forms of task-oriented curriculum development will involve a series of steps ‘from below’, a form of empowerment of educators, and a series of steps ‘from above’, where the adoption of a functional (as contrasted with a structural) theory of language, here represented by systemic functional linguistics, is likely to be crucial. When such a functional theory is further tailored to educational imperatives through the construct of genre, it is possible to reposition ‘task’ as a genre-based educative effort that can be expected to make significant contributions not only to the TBLT agenda itself but to the entire field of languages studies.
Published online: 5 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.07byr
References (78)
References
Allen, L. (2000). Designing curriculum for standards-based culture/language learning. Northeast Conference Reviw, 47, 14–21.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, E., Valdés, G., & Miano, A. (2010). A chronicle of Standards-based curricular reform in a research university. In V.M. Scott (Ed.), Principles and practices of the Standards in college foreign language education (pp. 54–85). Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Breen, M., & Candlin, C. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 89–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breen, M., Hird, B., Milton, M. Oliver, R., & Thwaite, A. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: Teachers' principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 22, 470–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bunch, G., & Willett, K. (2013). Writing to mean in middle school: Understanding how second language writers negotiate textually-rich content-area instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 141–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busse, V., & Walter, C. (2013). Foreign language motivation in higher education: A longitudinal study of motivational changes and their causes. Modern Language Journal, 97, 435–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., Norris, J., & Van den Branden, K. (2009). Coda: Understanding TBLT at the interface between research and pedagogy. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J.M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 495–499). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E., & Athanasopoulos, P. (Guest eds.). (2015). The language and thought of motion in second language speakers. Modern Language Journal, 99-S.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate FL curriculum. Language Testing, 19, 419–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Literacy as a framework for advanced language acquisition. ADFL Bulletin, 37(1), 11–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Language acquisition and language learning. In D.G. Nicholls (Ed.), Introduction to scholarship in modern languages and literatures, (3rd. ed.) (pp. 48–69). New York, NY: MLA.Google Scholar
. (Ed.). (2009). Instructed foreign language acquisition as meaning-making: A systemic functional approach. Special Issue: Linguistics and Education, 20, 1–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012a). Conceptualizing FL writing development in collegiate settings: A genre-based systemic functional linguistic approach. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 190–218). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
. (2012b). Of frameworks and the goals of collegiate foreign language education: Critical reflections. Applied Linguistics Review, 3, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Positioning writing as meaning-making in writing research: An introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 95–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2014a). Linking task and writing for language development: Evidence from a genre-based curricular approach. In H. Byrnes & R.M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 235–261). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2014b). Theorizing language development at the intersection of 'task' and L2 writing: Reconsidering complexity. In H. Byrnes & R.M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 79–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., Crane, C., Maxim, H.H., & Sprang, K.A. (2006). Taking text to task: Issues and choices in curriculum construction. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 85–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R.M. (Eds.). (2014a). Task-based L2 language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Manchon, R.M. (2014b). Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing: An introduction. In H. Byrnes & R.M. Manchon (Eds.), Task-based L2 language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R.M. (2014c). Task, task performance, and writing development: Advancing the constructs and the research agenda. In H. Byrnes & R.M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based L2 language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 265–296). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., Maxim, H.H., & Norris, J.M. (2010). Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Modern Language Journal, 94, s-1, iv–vi, 1–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, F. (2012). Language education throughout the school years: A functional perspective. Language Learning, 62, S-1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Crookes, G. (1986). Task classification: A cross-disciplinary review. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Social Science Research Institute, Center for Second Language Classroom Research (Technical Report No. 4).Google Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 431–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2013). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (2011). Reconciling contrasting approaches to genre analysis: The whole can equal more than the sum of the parts. In D. Belcher, A.M. Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions in English for Specific Purposes research (pp. 119–144). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gebhard, M., Chen, I-A., Graham, H., & Gunawan, W. (2013).Teaching to mean, writing to mean: SFL, L2 literacy, and teacher education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 107–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gebhard, M., & Harman, R. (2011). Reconsidering genre theory in K–12 schools: A response to school reforms in the United States. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 45–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gebhard, M., Willet, J., Jimenez, J., & Piedra A. (2010). Systemic functional linguistics, teachers' professional development, and ELLS' academic literacy practices. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners (pp. 91–110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz, The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Haim, O. (2015). Investigating transfer of academic proficiency among trilingual immigrant students: A holistic tri-directional approach. Modern Language Journal, 99(4).Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (2007). The notion of "context" in language education (1991). In J.J. Webster (Ed.), The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. Vol. 9, Language and education (pp. 269–290). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Harman, R. (2013). Literary intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 125–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulstjin, I., Young, R.F., & Ortega, L. (Guest Eds.) (2014). Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 361–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubanyiova, M., & Crookes, G. (2016). Re-envisioning the roles and tasks of language teachers in the post-centenary era of modern language education research. Modern Language Journal, 100-S.Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Speaking and writing tasks and their effects on second language performance. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 365–377). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1993). The name of the task and task of naming: Methodological aspects of task-based pedagogy. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 69–96). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J.P. (2005). Sociocultural and second language learning research: an exegesis. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), The handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 335–353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Reflecting on the cognitive–social debate in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, S-1, 773–787. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48–72). Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
Leow, R.P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long. M.H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In M.H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 19–76). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.R. (1984). Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.), Children writing: A reader (pp. 21 –30). Geelong, VIC, Australia: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
. (1985). Process and text. Two aspects of human semiosis. In J.D. Benson & W.S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse (pp. 243–274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
. (1991). Intrinsic functionality: Implications for contextual theory. Social Semiotics, 1, 99–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20, 10–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2009). Meaning in the making: Meaning potential emerging from acts of meaning. Language Learning, 59, S-1, 206–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages. (2007). Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world. Profession 2007, 234–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perspectives (2013). Proficiency benchmarks and tests for K–12 world language educators. Modern Language Journal, 97, 652–673.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (2007). Processability theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 137–154) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2010). Towards mastering the discourses of reasoning: Use of grammatical metaphor at advanced levels of foreign language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 92, 181–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Developmental changes in the use of interactional resources: Persuading the reader in FL book reviews. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 243–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Preparing graduate student teachers for advanced content-based instruction: Exploring content through grammatical metaphor. In H. Willis Allen & H.H. Maxim (Eds.), Educating the future FL professoriate for the 21st century (pp. 82–104). Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H. (2013). Writing as learning to know: Tracing knowledge construction in L2 German compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 179–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119–140). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M.J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M.J., & O'Hallaron, C.L. (2011). Teaching academic language in L2 secondary settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprang, K.A. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition and advanced learners: The role of grammaticization and conceptual organization in the acquisition of German verbs with inseparable prefixes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (Ed.) (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (Ed.) (2006). Task-based language education. From theory to practive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J.M. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Introducing the reader. In K. van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J.M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 2–13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., & Smiskova, H. (2012). Foreign language writing development from a dynamic usage-based perspective. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 17–47). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G.P., & McTighe, J. (1998/2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
Yule, G. (1997). Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cited by (18)

Cited by 18 other publications

Gutiérrez, Xavier
2024. Implementation of task-based language teaching in a Spanish language program: Instructors’ and students’ perceptions. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Chan, Hang
2023. Ideating task‐based designs for special education learners. TESOL Journal 14:3 DOI logo
Li, Hongyu & Nathan Thomas
2023. Chinese EFL teachers’ understandings and implementation of task-based language teaching. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 3:2 ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Jackson, Daniel O.
2022. Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Ellis, Rod
2021. Options in a task-based language-teaching curriculum. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 1:1 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Bernhardt, Elizabeth, Paul Nissler & Cici Malik Leffell
2020. An Integrated Curriculum in Collegiate‐Level German Studies with Accompanying Proficiency Ratings. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 53:1 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Andon, Nick, Martin Dewey & Constant Leung
2018. Tasks in the pedagogic space. In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Bygate, Martin
2018. Creating and using the space for speaking within the foreign language classroom. In Speaking in a Second Language [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 17], ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Bygate, Martin
2020. Some directions for the possible survival of TBLT as a real world project. Language Teaching 53:3 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2018. Advanced‐Level Grammatical Development in Instructed SLA. In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2019. Applying SFL for Understanding and Fostering Instructed Second Language Development. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, ► pp. 512 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2019. Affirming the context of instructed SLA: The potential of curricular thinking. Language Teaching Research 23:4 ► pp. 514 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2020. Envisioning L2 writing development in CDST under a curricular optic. In Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 54], ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2020. Toward an agenda for researching L2 writing and language learning. In Writing and Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 56], ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2022. Heidi Byrnes's essential bookshelf: Curriculum. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Samuda, Virginia, Martin Bygate & Kris Van den Branden
2018. Introduction. In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Youjin, Yeonjoo Jung & Nicole Tracy‐Ventura
2017. Implementation of a Localized Task‐Based Course in an EFL Context: A Study of Students’ Evolving Perceptions. TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 632 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Josephine & Alfred Rue Burch
2017. Collaborative Planning in Process: An Ethnomethodological Perspective. TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 536 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.