Cover not available
Article published In:
Terminology as a Societal Resource: Possibilities and Responsibilities in a Changing World
Edited by Nina Pilke, Niina Nissilä and Hans Landqvist
[Terminology 27:1] 2021
► pp. 56–79

Terminology work as open, communal and collaborative crowdsourcing practice of academic communities

 | University of Helsinki
 | University of Helsinki
 | University of Helsinki
This article introduces the Helsinki Term Bank for the Arts and Sciences (HTB), as an innovative case of a terminology project which constructs a database of scholarly terms by offering a multidisciplinary platform for collaborative terminology work and niche-sourcing at the wiki-based internet platform. Moreover, the HTB is theorised as an Information Infrastructure (II) to present and dissect how a particular set of values is embedded and woven into the HTB’s design and structure. Analysing the results of the two surveys aimed at the users and experts of the HTB in 2019, the article discusses how these values are transforming and evolving further in the HTB’s multidimensional network of actors.
Keywords: LSP, niche-sourcing, information infrastructure, open science, terminology of the arts and sciences, values, wiki
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Platform, objectives and community of the HTB
    • 2.1Starting points and aims of the HTB
    • 2.2HTB’s community of administrators, experts and users
  • 3.HTB as an Information Infrastructure (II)
    • 3.1Principles of terminology work reflected in the HTB’s design
    • 3.2Language policy embedded in the HTB’s functions
    • 3.3Implementing open science in the HTB’s principles
  • 4.Manifestation of values in the content and activities of the HTB
    • 4.1Values connected to the roles and quality control of terminology work
    • 4.2Values connected to language policy
    • 4.3Values connected to open science
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Online sources
Published online: 5 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/term.00058.enq
References (32)
References
Bietz, Matthew, Eric Baumer, and Charlotte Lee. 2010. “Synergising in Cyberinfrastructure Development.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 19 (2): 245–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey C., Karen Baker, Florence Millerand, and David Ribes. 2010. “Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment.” In International Handbook of Internet Research, ed. by Jeremy Hunsinger, Lisbeth Klastrup, and Matthew Allen, 97–117. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Haarala, Risto. 1981. Sanastotyön opas [Guide to terminology work]. Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskuksen julkaisuja 16. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Jyrki Kalliokoski, Salli Kankaanpää, Antti Kanner, Kimmo Koskenniemi, Lea Laitinen, Sari Maamies, and Pirkko Nuolijärvi. 2009. Suomen kielen tulevaisuus. Kielipoliittinen toimintaohjelma [The future of Finnish: Language policy action programme]. Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskuksen verkkojulkaisuja 7. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus [The Institute for the Languages of Finland]. ([URL]). Accessed 8 November 2019.
Hassard, John, and John Law. 1999. Actor Network Theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Häggman, Kai. 2012. Sanojen talossa. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura 1890-luvulta talvisotaan [The Finnish Literature Society from the 1890’s to the Winter War]. Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
ISO 704. 2009. Terminology work – Principles and methods. Geneva: International Standards Organisation.Google Scholar
Karasti, Helena, and Karen S. Baker. 2004. “Infrastructuring for the long-term: ecological information management.” HICSS ’04 Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04): 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karsch, Barbara Inge. 2014. “Terminology work and crowdsourcing. Coming to terms with the crowd.” In Handbook of Terminology: Volume 1, ed. by Hendrik J. Kockaert, and Frieda Steurs, 291–303. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kosunen, Riina. 2010. “Introductory tutorials in the principles of terminology work provided by the Government Terminology Service – the present and future.” In Ordning och reda: terminologilära i teori och praktik, ed. by Anita Nuopponen, and Nina Pilke, 117–125. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. “On recalling ANT.” The Sociological Review 47 (1): 15–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Reassembling the Social: an introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2017. Kansalliskielistrategian toimintasuunnitelma [Implementation Plan of the Strategy for National Languages]. Oikeusministeriön julkaisu 13/2017. Helsinki: Oikeusministeriö.Google Scholar
Mongili, Allessandro, and Giuseppina Pellegrino. 2014. “The Boundaries of Information Infrastructures: An Introduction.” In Information Infrastructure(s): Boundaries, Ecologies, Multiplicity, ed. by Allessandro Mongili, and Giuseppina Pellegrino, xviii–xlvi. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Monteiro, Eric, Neil Pollock, Ole Hanseth, and Robin Williams. 2013. “From Artefacts to Infrastructures.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 22 (3): 575–607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, Henrik, Antti Kanner, and Tiina Onikki-Rantajääskö. 2016. “Post och bank – om lagring av terminologi, den svenska Rikstermbanken och den finska Vetenskapstermbanken.” In Tänkta termer – Terminologihänsyn i nordiskt perspektiv. VAKKI Publications Nr. 5, ed. by Nina Pilke, and Niina Nissilä, 100–136. Vasa: Vasa universitet.Google Scholar
Nuopponen, Anita, and Nina Pilke, eds. 2010. Ordning och reda. Terminologilära i teori och praktik. Stockholm: Nordstedts.Google Scholar
Picht, Heribert, and Jennifer Draskau. 1985. Terminology: an introduction. Surrey: Department of Linguistic and International Studies, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Pitkänen-Heikkilä, Kaarina. 2015. “Adjectives as terms.” Terminology 21 (1): 76–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Ovatko vain substantiivit termejä? Hakusanan valinnasta termityössä [Are terms only nouns? Choosing a headword in terminology work].” Sananjalka 601: 162–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ray, Rebecca. 2009. LISA Industry Insights: Crowdsourcing. Geneva: Localisation Industry Standards Association.Google Scholar
Star, Susan Leigh, and Karen Ruhleder. 1996. “Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces.” Information Systems Research 7 (1): 111–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Temmerman, Rita. 2000. Towards new ways of terminology description. The socio-cognitive approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Temmerman, Rita, and Marc Van Campenhoudt. 2011. “The dynamics of terms in specialised communication: An interdisciplinary perspective.” Terminology 17 (1): 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
University of Helsinki. 2014. Language policy of the University of Helsinki. From Guidelines to Practice: Towards Functional Multilingualism. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
. 2019. Research Assessment Reports 2018–2019. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
. 2021. Strategic Plan 2021-2030. With the Power of Knowledge for the World. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. ([URL]).Google Scholar
Valtioneuvosto. 2019. Pääministeri Antti Rinteen hallituksen ohjelma 6.6.2019. Osallistava ja osaava Suomi: Sosiaalisesti, taloudellisesti ja ekologisesti kestävä yhteiskunta [Government Action Plan of Prime Minister Antti Rinne’s Government 2019. Inclusive and competent Finland – a socially, economically and ecologically sustainable society]. Valtioneuvoston julkaisuja 2019: 27. Helsinki: Finnish Government. ([URL]).
Online sources
HTB = The Helsinki Term Bank for the Arts and Sciences. ([URL]).
Wikipedia. Policies and guidelines. ([URL]). Accessed 24 October 2019.