Cover not available
Part of
The Power of Satire
Edited by Marijke Meijer Drees and Sonja de Leeuw
[Topics in Humor Research 2] 2015
► pp. 33–46

The Authenticity of Play

Satiric Television's Challenge to Authorative Discourses

Employing the heuristic of space, target, media, rhetoric, and time, this chapter reexamines US scholarship on contemporary television satire. What we see repeatedly are struggles over what constitutes legitimate and illegitimate forms of public speech, language, and actions within televisual and non-televisual spaces. Satire has emerged, employing various forms of fakery and a rhetoric of play, to challenge the representative roles that politicians and news media have claimed for themselves, including the language of authority that undergirds their positions of power. Play and fakery invite popular participation and direct forms of representation, including across media forms. Finally, satire, parody and irony are seen as more authentic forms of public language and critique in an age dominated by the professionally packaged and managed discourses employed by politicians and commercial forces.
Published online: 22 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.2.03jon
References (32)
References
Baym, Geoffrey. 2010. From Cronkite to Colbert: The Evolution of Broadcast News. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Baym, Geoffrey and Jeffrey P. Jones. 2012. News Parody and Political Satire Across the Globe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bennett, Lance, Reginia Lawrence and Steven Livingson. 2008. When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Matt and Jason T. Peifer. 2013. “The Impudence of Being Earnest: Jon Stewart and the Boundaries of Discursive Responsibility.” Journal of Communication 63(2): 333–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie. 2010. “Self-mediation: New Media and Citizenship.” Critical Discourse Studies 7(4): 227–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Stephen. 2005. “The Lonely Citizen: Indirect Representation in an Age of Networks.” Political Communication 22: 197–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Day, Amber. 2011. Satire and Dissent: Interventions in Contemporary Political Debate. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Delwiche, Aaron and Jennifer Jacobs Henderson. 2012. The Participatory Cultures Handbook. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ettema, James S. and Theodore L. Glasser. 1998. Custodians of Conscience: Investigative Journalism and Public Virtue. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Jonathan. 2005. Watching with The Simpsons: Television, Parody, and Intertextuality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Throwing Out the Welcome Mat: Public Figures as Guests and Victims in TV Satire.” In Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era, ed. by Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P. Jones and Ethan Thompson, 147–166. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Jonathan, Jeffrey P. Jones and Ethan Thompson (eds.). 2009. Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, Stephen. 2014. Australian TV News: New Forms, Functions, and Futures. Intellect, Ltd.Google Scholar
Hart, Roderick P. and Joanne Hartelius. 2007. “The Political Sins of Jon Stewart.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 24(3): 263–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartley, John. 2010. “Silly Citizenship.” Critical Discourse Studies 7(4): 233–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Henry. 2009. “Why Mitt Romney Won’t Debate a Snowman.” In Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era, ed. by Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P. Jones and Ethan Thompson, 187–209. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Henry, Sam Ford and Joshua Green. 2013. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Jeffrey P. 2005. Entertaining Politics: New Political Television and Civic Culture. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
. 2010. Entertaining Politics: Satiric Television and Political Engagement. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Parody, Performativity, and Play: The Reinvigoration of Citizenship through Political Satire.” In A Companion to New Media Dynamics, ed. by John Hartley, Jean Burgess and Axel Bruns, 396–406. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2013a. “Presidential Campaigns as Cultural Events: The Convergence of Politics and Popular Culture in Election 2012.” In The 2012 Presidential Campaign: A Communication Perspective, ed. by Robert E. Denton, Jr, 115–130. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
. 2013b. “Toward a New Vocabulary for Political Communication Research.” International Journal of Communication 7: 510–530.Google Scholar
Jones, Jeffrey P., Geoffrey Baym and Amber Day. 2012. “Mr. Stewart and Mr. Colbert Go to Washington: Television Satirists Outside the Box.” Social Research 79(1): 33–60.Google Scholar
Linkins, Jason. 2009. “Online Poll: Jon Stewart is America’s Most Trusted Newsman.” Huffington Post, [URL].Google Scholar
McClennen, Sophia A. 2011. Colbert’s America: Satire and Democracy. New York: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Meikle, Graham. 2008. “Whacking Bush: Tactical Media as Play.” In Digital Media and Democracy, ed. by Megan Boler, 367–382. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Meaghan and Paul Patton (eds.). 1979. Michel Foucault: Power, Truth, Strategy. Sydney: Feral Publications.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstone, Roger. 1999. Why Study the Media? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Test, George A. 1991. Satire: Spirit and Art. Tampa: University of South Florida Press.Google Scholar
Tinic, Serra. 2009. “Speaking ‘Truth’ to Power? Television Satire, Rick Mercer Report, and the Politics of Place and Space.” In Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era, ed. by Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P. Jones and Ethan Thompson, 167–186. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Van Zoonen, Liesbet. 2012. “ I-pistemology: Changing Truth Claims in Popular and Political Culture.” European Journal of Communication 27(3): 56–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar