Part of
The Power of Satire
Edited by Marijke Meijer Drees and Sonja de Leeuw
[Topics in Humor Research 2] 2015
► pp. 217234
References (35)
References
Altena, Peter. 2012. Gerrit Paape (1752–1803). Levens en werken. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar
Amarasingam, Amarnath (ed.). 2011. The Stewart/Colbert Effect. Essays on the Real Impact of Fake News. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.Google Scholar
Amurath-Effendi and Hekim Bachi [pseudonym of Pieter van Woensel]. 1792–1801. De Lantaarn voor … [5 parts]. Amsterdam: In ’t Nieuwe Licht. [Online available at [URL]]Google Scholar
Andries, Lise. 1989. “Almanacs: Revolutionizing a Traditional Genre.” In Revolution in Print. The Press in France, 1775–1800, ed. by Robert Darnton and Daniel Roche, 203–222. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bosch, René. 2007. Labyrinth of Digressions: Tristram Shandy As Perceived and Influenced by Sterne’s Early Imitators. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Byrd, Max. 1985. Tristram Shandy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Campbell Ross, Ian. 2001. Laurence Sterne: A Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Capp, Bernard. 1979. Astrology and the Popular Press: English Almanacs 1500–1800. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. 1991. The Cultural Origins of the French Revolution. Translated by Lydia G. Cochrane. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cillessen, W. 2008. “‘Holland herboren – Europa in nood.’ Die Hollandia Regenerata des David Hess und ihre europeïsche Rezeption.” In Bilderhandel und Bilderverbreitung im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert, ed. by A. Milano, 333–349. Roverto: Via della Terra.Google Scholar
Connery, Brain A. and Kirk Combe (eds.). 1995. Theorizing Satire. Essays in Literary Criticism. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
De Niet, Marco. 1995. “De januskop van de achttiende-eeuwse Nederlandse almanak.” In Dierbaar magazijn. De bibliotheek van de Maatschappij der Nederlandse Letterkunde, ed. by Berry Dongelmans et al., 70–82. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Day, Amber. 2009. “And Now…the News? Mimesis and the Real in The Daily Show .” In Satire TV. Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era, ed. by Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P. Jones and Ethan Thompson, 85–103. New York/London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Trischa (ed.). 2011. The Daily Show and Rhetoric. Arguments, Issues, and Strategies. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Gray, Jonathan, Jeffrey P. Jones and Ethan Thompson (eds.). 2009. Satire TV. Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era. New York/London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Dustin. 1994. Satire. A Critical Reintroduction. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Hawley, Judith. 2009. “ Tristram Shandy, Learned Wit, and Enlightenment Knowledge.” In The Cambridge Companion to Laurence Sterne, ed. by Thomas Keymer, 34–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric J. 1962. The Age of Revolution, 1789–1848. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I. 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity and the Emancipation of Man, 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Margaret C. and Wijnand W. Mijnhardt (eds.). 1992. The Dutch Republic in the Eighteenth Century: Decline, Enlightenment and Revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jourdan, Annie. 2007. “The Batavian Revolution. Typical Dutch, typical French or just Atlantic?Dutch Crossing 31(2): 271–288.Google Scholar
Keymer, Thomas (ed.). 2009. The Cambridge Companion to Laurence Sterne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, Ivo. 2012. “Outsiders on the Inside. The Eccentric Enlightenment of Pieter van Woensel.” De Achttiende Eeuw 45(2): 49–63.Google Scholar
. 2014. Onder het mom van satire. Laster, spot en ironie in Nederland, 1780–1800. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
Oddens, Joris. 2012. Pioniers in schaduwbeeld. Het eerste parlement van Nederland 1796–1798. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar
Outram, Dorinda. 2005. The Enlightenment. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, R.R. 1954. “Much in Little. The Dutch Revolution of 1795.” The Journal of Modern History 26(1): 15–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichardt, Rolf. 1998. “Light Against Darkness: The Visual Representation of a Central Enlightenment Concept.” Translated by Deborah Cohen. Representations 61, Special Issue: Practices of Enlightenment: 95–148.Google Scholar
Rutjes, Mart. 2012. Door gelijkheid gegrepen. Democratie, burgerschap en staat in Nederland 1795–1801. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar
Salman, Jeroen. 1999. Populair drukwerk in de Gouden Eeuw. De almanak als lectuur en handelswaar. Zutphen: Walburg Pers.Google Scholar
Schama, Simon. 1977. Patriots and Liberators. Revolution in the Netherlands, 1780–1813. London: Collins.Google Scholar
. 1989. Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Walsh, Marcus. 2009. “Scriblerian Satire, A Political Romance, ‘Rabelaisian Fragment’, and the Origins of Tristram Shandy ”. In The Cambridge Companion to Laurence Sterne, ed. by Thomas Keymer, 21–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woensel, Pieter van. 2002. De lantaarn. Satirische teksten uit de achttiende eeuw. Edited by André Hanou. Amsterdam: Athenaeum-Polak & Van Gennep.Google Scholar