Part of
Language in Interaction: Studies in honor of Eve V. Clark
Edited by Inbal Arnon, Marisa Casillas, Chigusa Kurumada and Bruno Estigarribia
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 12] 2014
► pp. 303314
References (21)
References
Barlow, M. (2000). Usage, blends and grammar. In S. Kemmer & M. Barlow (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 315–345). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Beckner, C., & Bybee, J. (2009). A usage-based account of constituency and reanalysis. Language Learning , 59(Suppl.1, Dec.), 29–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Language, usage and cognition . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.V., & Amaral, P.M. (2010). Children build on pragmatic information in language acquisition. Language and Linguistic Compass , 4(7), 445–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.V., & Clark, H.H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language , 55(4), 767–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2004) BYU-BNC (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press ). Retrieved from: <[URL]>.Google Scholar
. (2007). Time Magazine Corpus (100 million words, 1923–2006) . Retrieved from: <[URL]>.Google Scholar
. (2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present . Retrieved from: <[URL]<.Google Scholar
. (2010) The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009 . Retrieved from: <[URL]>.Google Scholar
. (2012). Corpus of American Soap Operas, 2001– 2012 (100 million words) . Retrieved from: <[URL].<Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, J. (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics , 39, 1041–1070. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, S. (2004). Are low-frequency complex prepositions grammaticalized? On the limits of corpus data — and the importance of intuition. In H. Lindquist & C. Mair (Eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English (pp. 171–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Israel, M. (1996). The way constructions grow. In A.E. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 217–230). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noël, D. (2007). Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language , 14(2), 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd ed. (n.d.). Retrieved from: <[URL]>.
Wilson, D.V. (2009). From ‘remaining’ to ‘becoming’ in Spanish: The role of prefabs in the development of the construction Quedar(se) + ADJECTIVE. In R. Corrigan, E. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, & K. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic language , Vol. I. (pp. 273–295). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar