Cover not available
Part of
Input and Experience in Bilingual Development
Edited by Theres Grüter and Johanne Paradis
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 13] 2014
► pp. 161–180

French-English bilingual children’s sensitivity to child-level and language-level input factors in morphosyntactic acquisition

 | University of Alberta
 | Dalhousie University
 | Dalhousie University
This chapter presents three studies from a research program investigating how French-English bilingual children’s morphosyntactic acquisition is influenced by child-level input factors such as bilingual versus monolingual learning, and variation in home input among bilinguals, as well as language-level input factors such as the token/type frequency and distributional consistency of morphosyntactic constructions. Two existing studies from this program found sensitivity to these input factors in 4-year-olds’ acquisition of past tense morphology in both French and English (Paradis, Nicoladis, Crago, & Genesee 2011) and in 6-year-olds’ acquisition of bound and free verb morphology in English (Paradis 2010). A new study reported in this chapter examined the French morphosyntax of bilingual 6-year-olds as compared to 11-year-old bilingual children and 6-year-old monolingual French-speaking children. Children were given both elicitation and grammaticality judgement tasks probing their abilities with French direct object clitics and a control structure, definite articles. Similar to the previous studies, differences between monolinguals and bilinguals, and among bilinguals, varied according to home input factors and morphosyntactic construction; however, most differences were neutralized in the older bilingual group. The final section discusses results from all three studies that point to the combined influence of multiple sources of input variation on bilingual morphosyntactic acquisition.
Published online: 24 October 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.13.09par
References (35)
References
Bohman, T., Bedore, L., Peña, E., Mendez-Perez, A., & Gillam, R. (2010). What you hear and what you say: language performance in Spanish-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13, 325-344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brace, N., Kemp, R., & Snelgar, R. (2009). SPSS for psychologists. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216-236). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M. (1999). The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 145-233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Elin Thordardottir, Rothenberg, A., Rivard, M.E., & Naves, R. (2006). Bilingual assessment: Can overall proficiency be estimated from separate measurement of two languages? Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 4, 1-21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V.M. (2007). Miami and North Wales, so far and yet so near: A constructivist account of morpho-syntactic development in bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 224-247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Interface or face to face? The profiles and contours of bilinguals and specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 282-293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V.M., & Thomas, E.M. (2009). Bilingual first-language development: Dominant language takeover; threatened minority language take-up. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 213-237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granfeldt, J., & Schlyter, S. (2004). Cliticisation in the acquisition of French as L1 and L2. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories (pp. 333-370). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T. (2005). Comprehension and production of French object clitics by child second language learners and children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 363-391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T. (2009). A unified account of object clitics and referential null objects in French. Syntax, 12, 215–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T., & Crago, M. (2012). Object clitics and their omission in child L2 French: The contributions of processing limitations and L1 transfer. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 531-549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V., & Simón-Cereijido, G. (2007). The discriminant accuracy of a grammatical measure with Latino English-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 50, 968-981. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V., Simon-Cereijido, G., & Wagner, C. (2008). Bilingual children with language impairment: A comparison with monolinguals and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 3-20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C. (2004). Comparing the development of the nominal and the verbal functional domain in French language impairment. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories (pp. 109-144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E., Core, C., Place, S., Rumiche, R., Señor, M., & Parra, M. (2012). Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 39, 1-27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A. (2000). L’acquisition des pronoms clitiques français par un enfant bilingue français–néerlandais [The acquisition of French clitic pronouns by a French–Dutch bilingual child]. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 45, 97–118.Google Scholar
. (2004). The acquisition of the French DP in a bilingual context. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories (pp. 243-274). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C., Nash, L., Rigaut, C., & Gérard, C.-L. (1998). Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition, 7, 113-160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C., & Rigaut, C. (2000). L’acquisition des clitiques nominatifs et des clitiques objets en français [The acquisition of nominative and object clitics in French]. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 45, 119-158.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1975). French syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lieven, E. (2010). Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua, 120, 2546-2556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216-236). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Third Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2007). French children’s use and correction of weird word orders: A constructivist account. Journal of Child Language, 34, 381-409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, N., & Hulk, A. (2001). Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicoladis, E., Palmer, A., & Marentette, P. (2007). The role of type and token frequency in using past tense morphemes correctly. Developmental Science, 10, 237-254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2004). On the relevance of specific language impairment to understanding the role of transfer in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 67-82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Bilingual children’s acquisition of English verb morphology: Effects of language dominance, structure difficulty, and task type. Language Learning, 60, 651-680. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Crago, M., & Genesee, F. (2005/2006). Domain-specific versus domain-general theories of the deficit in SLI: Object pronoun acquisition by French-English bilingual children. Language Acquisition, 13, 33-62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Nicoladis, E., Crago, M., & Genesee, F. (2011). Bilingual children’s acquisition of the past tense: A Usage-Based approach. Journal of Child Language, 38, 554-578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A.T., Pirvulescu, M., & Roberge, Y. (2009). Bilingualism as a window into the language faculty: The acquisition of objects in French-speaking children in bilingual and monolingual contexts. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 97-112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P. (2006). The phenomenon of object omission in child L2 French. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 263–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, M., & Wexler, K. (2001). Test of early grammatical impairment. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Granfeldt, Jonas, Marianne Gullberg & Carmen Muñoz
2023. Input in study abroad and views from acquisition: Focus on constructs, operationalization and measurement issues: Introduction to the special issue. Second Language Research 39:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Core, Cynthia
2020. Effects of nonnative input on language abilities in Spanish-English bilinguals. In Child bilingualism and second language learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 10], ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Müller, Nicole, Sarah-Ann Muckley & Stanislava Antonijevic-Elliott
2019. Where phonology meets morphology in the context of rapid language change and universal bilingualism: Irish initial mutations in child language. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 33:1-2 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Nic Fhlannchadha, Siobhán & Tina M. Hickey
2017. Acquiring an opaque gender system in Irish, an endangered indigenous language. First Language 37:5 ► pp. 475 ff. DOI logo
Paradis, Johanne & Ruiting Jia
2017. Bilingual children's long‐term outcomes in English as a second language: language environment factors shape individual differences in catching up with monolinguals. Developmental Science 20:1 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Bilingualism, Language Development and Processing across the Lifespan [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 15], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.