Studies of children’s use of intonation in reference are few in number but are diverse in terms of theoretical frameworks and intonational parameters. In the current review, I present a re-analysis of the referents in each study, using a three-dimension approach (i.e., referential givenness-newness, relational givenness-newness, contrast), discuss the use of intonation at two levels (phonetic, phonological), and compare findings from different studies within a single framework. The patterns stemming from these studies may be limited in generalisability but can serve as initial hypotheses for future work. Furthermore, to shed light on the role of input in the acquisition of intonational encoding of referents, I examine caregivers’ use of intonation in reference in infant direct speech. In addition, I discuss how future research can advance our knowledge of these issues.
Bard, E.G., & Aylett, M. (1999). The dissociation of deaccenting, givenness, and syntactic role in spontaneous speech. In J.J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville, & A.C. Bailey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1753–1756). San Francisco, CA: University of California.
Baumann, S. (2006). The intonation of givenness: Evidence from German. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
Baumann, S., Becker, J., Grice, M., & Mücke, D. (2007). Tonal and articulatory marking of focus in German. In J. Trouvain & W.J. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1029–1032). Dudweiler: Pirrot.
Baumann, S., & Grice, M. (2006). The intonation of accessibility. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1636–1657.
Baumann, S., & Hadelich, K. (2003). Accent type and givenness: An experiment with auditory and visual priming. In M. Solé, D. Recasens, & J. Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1811–1814). Rundle Mall, SA, Australia: Causal Productions.
Behrens, H., & Gut, U. (2005). The relationship between syntactic and prosodic organisation in early multiword speech. Journal of Child Language, 32(1), 1–34.
Bolinger, D.L. (1983). Intonation and gesture. American Speech, 58(2), 156–174.
Bortfeld, H., & Morgan, J. (2010). Is early word-form processing stress-full? How natural variability supports recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 60(4), 241–266.
Braun, B. (2006). Phonetics and phonology of thematic contrast in German. Language and Speech, 49(4), 451–493.
Chafe, W.L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C.N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Chen, A. (2010). Is there really an asymmetry in the acquisition of the focus-to-accentuation mapping. Lingua, 120(8), 1926–1939.
Chen, A. (2011a). Tuning information structure: Intonational realisation of topic and focus in child Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 38, 1055–1083.
Chen, A. (2011b). The developmental path to phonological encoding of focus in Dutch. In S. Frota, G. Elordieta, & P. Prieto (Eds.), Prosodic categories: Production, perception and comprehension (pp. 93–109). Dordrecht: Springer.
Chen, A. (2014). Production-comprehension (a)symmetry: Individual differences in the acquisition of prosody focus-marking. In N. Campbell, D. Gibbon, & D. Hirst (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Speech Prosody Conference. <[URL]>
Chen, A., & Fikkert P. (2007a). Intonation of early two-word utterances in Dutch. In J. Trouvain, & J.B. William (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Dudweiler: Pirrot GmbH.
Chen, A., & Fikkert, P. (2007b). Dutch 3-year-olds’ use of intonation in marking topic and focus. Poster presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (GALA), Barcelona, Spain.
Cristia, A. (2013). Input to language: The phonetics and perception of infant-directed speech. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7(3), 157–170.
Cutler, A., & Swinney, D.A. (1987). Prosody and the development of comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 14(1), 145–167.
de Ruiter, L. (2010). Studies on intonation and information structure in child and adult German (Doctoral dissertation). Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Fernald, A., & Mazzie, C. (1991). Prosody and focus in speech to infants and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27(2), 209–221.
Fisher, C., & Tokura, H. (1995). The given-new contract in speech to infants. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(3), 287–310.
Flemming, E. (2008). The role of pitch range in focus marking. Slides from a talk given at the Workshop on Information Structure and Prosody, Studiecentrum Soeterbeeck, Ravenstein, Netherlands. <[URL]>
Gundel, J.K., & Fretheim, T. (2004). Topic and focus. In L.R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 175–196). Oxford: Blackwell.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English II. Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 199–244.
Hanssen, J., Peters, J., & Gussenhoven, C. (2008). Prosodic effects of focus in Dutch declaratives. In P.A. Barbosa, S. Madureira, & C. Reis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Speech Prosody Conference (pp. 609–612). Campinas: Editora RG/CNPq.
Hawkins, S., & Warren, P. (1994). Phonetic influences on the intelligibility of conversational speech. Journal of Phonetics, 22(4), 493–511.
Hornby, P.A., & Hass, W.A. (1970). Use of contrastive stress by preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13(2), 359–399.
Kitamura, C., & Burnham, D. (2003). Pitch and communicative intent in mothers’ speech: Adjustments for age and sex in the first year. Infancy, 4(1), 85–110.
Ladd, D.R. (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Striano, T., & Tomasello, M. (2006). 12- and 18-month-olds point to provide information for others. Journal of Cognition and Development, 7(2), 173–187.
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1978). Sentential devices for conveying givenness and newness: A cross-cultural developmental study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(5), 539–558.
Molnár, V. (2002). Contrast from a contrastive perspective. In I. Kruijff-Korbayová & M. Steedman (Eds.), Information structure in a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 147–161). Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.
Moore, C., & D’Entremont, B. (2001). Developmental changes in pointing as a function of attentional focus. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2(2), 109–129.
Müller, A., Höhle, B., Schmitz, M., & Weissenborn, J. (2006). Focus-to-stress alignment in 4- to 5-year-old German-learning children. In A. Belletti, E. Bennati, C. Chesi, E. Di Domenico, & I. Ferrari (Eds.), Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2005 (pp. 379–392). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Roberts, C. (2012). Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics, 5(6), 1–69.
Rooth, M.E. (1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75–116.
Tomasello, M., & Haberl, K. (2003). Understanding attention: 12- and 18-month-olds know what’s new for other persons. Developmental Psychology, 39(5), 906–912.
Vallduví, E., & Engdahl, E. (1996). The linguistic realisation of information packaging. Linguistics, 34(3), 459–519.
Watson, D., Arnold, J.E., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2005). Not just given and new: The effects of discourse and task based constraints on acoustic prominence. Poster presented at the 2005 CUNY Human Sentence Processing Conference, Tucson, AZ.
Watson, D., Arnold, J.E., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2006). Acoustic prominence and reference accessibility in language production. Proceedings of the Third Speech Prosody Conference. <[URL]>
Wells, B., & Local, J. (1993). The sense of an ending: A case of prosodic delay. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 7(1), 59–73.
Wells, B., Peppé, S., & Goulandris, N. (2004). Intonation development from five to thirteen. Journal of Child Language, 31(4), 749–778.
Wieman, L.A. (1976). Stress patterns in early child language. Journal of Child Language, 3, 283–286.
Wonnacott, E., & Watson, D. (2008). Acoustic emphasis in four year olds. Cognition, 107(3), 1093–1101.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Thorson, Jill C., Lauren R. Franklin & James L. Morgan
2023. Role of Pitch in Toddler Looking toNewandGivenReferents in American English. Language Learning and Development 19:4 ► pp. 458 ff.
2018. The developmental path to adult-like prosodic focus-marking in Mandarin Chinese-speaking children. First Language 38:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.