Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of Reference
Edited by Ludovica Serratrice and Shanley E.M. Allen
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 15] 2015
► pp. 285–309

Production and comprehension of pronouns and reflexives in atypical populations

The production and comprehension of pronouns and reflexives has been extensively studied in typically-developing children, but has received less attention in children with neurodevelopmental disorders in which language impairment is the primary or secondary deficit, such as in children with specific language impairment, autism spectrum disorders, Williams syndrome and Down syndrome. Research on the acquisition of these core grammatical structures by atypical populations is important for understanding the linguistic nature of the disorders. The present chapter provides a review of experimental studies on the production and comprehension of these structures in different groups of atypical child and adolescent populations from a cross-linguistic perspective. The purpose of the chapter is to unravel similarities and differences between the affected and unaffected groups, and to investigate patterns of delayed and/or deviant performance across modalities and populations.
Keywords: clitics, developmental disorders, language impairment, pronouns, reflexives
Published online: 25 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.15.12cho
References (81)
References
Arnold, J., Bennetto, L., & Diehl, J. (2009). Reference production in young speakers with and without autism: Effects of discourse status and processing constraints. Cognition, 110, 131–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baauw, S. (2002). Grammatical features and the acquisition of reference: A comparative study of Dutch and Spanish. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baauw, S., & Cuetos, F. (2003). The interpretation of pronouns in Spanish language acquisition and breakdown: Evidence for the “Principle B delay” as a non-unitary phenomenon. Language Acquisition, 11, 219–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baauw, S., Escobar, L., & Philip, W. (1997). A delay of Principle B effect in Spanish-speaking children: The role of lexical feature acquisition. In A. Sorace, C. Heycock, & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Proceedings of the GALA ‘97 Conference on Language Acquisition (pp. 81–92). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bedore, L., & Leonard, L. (2001). Grammatical morphology deficits in Spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 905–924. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellugi, U., Bihrle, A., Neville, H., Jernigan, T., & Doherty, S. (1992). Language, cognition, and brain organization in a neurodevelopmental disorder. In M. Gunnar & C. Nelson (Eds.), Developmental behavioral neuroscience (pp. 201–232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U., Lichtenberger, L., Jones, W., Lai, Z., & St. George, M. (2000). The neurocognitive profile of Williams syndrome: A complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, C., Paulus, M., & Fikkert, P. (2012). Preschoolers’ comprehension of pronouns and reflexives: The impact of the task. Journal of Child Language, 34, 777–803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, P., Barss, A., Nicol, J., & Conway, L. (1994). Children’s knowledge of binding and coreference: Evidence from spontaneous speech. Language, 70, 53–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bortolini, U., Caselli, M.C., Deevy, P., & Leonard, L. (2002). Specific language impairment in Italian: The first steps in the search for a clinical marker. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 37, 77–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chien, Y.-C., & Wexler, K. (1990). Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1, 225–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., Marinis, T., Edwards, S., & Blom, E. (2015). Production and on-line comprehension of definite articles and clitic pronouns in Greek-speaking sequential bilingual children and children with SLI. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1155–1191.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cipriani, P., Bottari, P., Chilosi, A.M., & Pfanner, L. (1998). A longitudinal perspective on the study of specific language impairment: The long-term follow-up of an Italian child. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 33, 245–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Almazan, M. (1998). Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome. Cognition, 68, 167–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Déchaine, R.-M., & Wiltschko, M. (2002). Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 33, 409–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J., Cahillane, J., & Altreuter, E. (2006). What can production reveal about Principle B? In K.U. Deen, J. Nomura, B. Schulz, & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America (GALANA) (pp. 89–100). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2004). The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language, 31, 661–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S., & Baddeley, A. (1990). Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 336–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavarró, A., Torrens, V., & Wexler, K. (2010). Object clitic omission: Two language types. Language Acquisition, 17, 192–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y., & Reinhart, T. (1993). The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 69–101.Google Scholar
Hendriks, P., & Koster, C. (2010). Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition. Lingua, 120, 1887–2094. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hestvik, A., Schwartz, R., Tornyova, L., Almodovar, D., Love, T., & Swinney, D. (2007). Binding theory and syntactic movement are dissociated in SLI. Paper presented at the 20th Annual CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, University of California at San Diego, USA.
Hulme, C., & Snowling, M.J. (2009). Developmental disorders of language learning and cognition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jakubowicz, C., & Nash, L. (in press). Why accusative clitics are avoided in normal and impaired language development. In C. Jakubowicz, L. Nash, & K. Wexler (Eds.), Essays in syntax, morphology and phonology in SLI. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Jakubowicz, C., Nash, L., Rigaut, C., & Gerard, C. (1998). Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition, 7, 113–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemper, T.L. (1988). Neuropathology of Down syndrome. In L. Nadel (Ed.), The psychobiology of Down syndrome (pp. 269–289). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kjelgaard, M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2001). An investigation of language impairment in autism: Implications for genetic subgroups. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 287–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korenberg, J.R., Chen, X.N., Hirota, H., Lai, Z., Bellugi, U., Burian, D., Roe, B., & Matsuoka, R. (2000). Genome structure and cognitive map of Williams syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (Issue supplement 1), 89–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, A., Hobson, R.P., & Chiat, S. (1994). I, you, me and autism: An experimental study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 155–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. (1997). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Manika, S., Varlokosta, S., & Wexler, K. (2011). The lack of omission of clitics in Greek children with SLI. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 429–437). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Marinis, T., & Saddy, D. (2013). Parsing the passive: Comparing children with specific language impairment to sequential bilingual children. Language Acquisition, 20, 155–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Pronoun co-referencing errors: Challenges for generativist and usage-based accounts. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 599–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mavrogiorgos, M. (2010). Clitics in Greek: A minimalist account of proclisis and enclisis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKee, C. (1992). A comparison of pronouns and anaphors in Italian and English acquisition. Language Acquisition, 2, 21–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. (1988). The developmental asynchrony of language development in children with Down syndrome. In L. Nadel (Ed.), The psychobiology of Down syndrome (pp. 167–199). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, J.W., & Leonard, L.B. (1998). Real-time inflectional processing by children with specific language impairment: Effects of phonetic substance. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1432–1443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). Effects of acoustic manipulation on the real-time inflectional processing of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 1238–1256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novogrodsky, R. (2013). Subject pronoun use by children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27, 85–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novogrodsky, R., & Friedmann, N. (2010). Not all dependencies are impaired in syntactic-SLI: Binding in children with a deficit in Wh-movement. In K. Franich, K. Mesh, & L. Keil (Eds.), Online supplement to the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. <[URL]> [29 April, 2014]Google Scholar
Perovic, A. (2006). Syntactic deficit in Down syndrome: More evidence for the modular organization of language. Lingua, 116, 1616–1630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perovic, A., Modyanova, N., & Wexler, K. (2013a). Comprehension of reflexive and personal pronouns in children with autism: A syntactic or pragmatic deficit? Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 813–835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013b). Comparison of grammar in neurodevelopmental disorders: The case of binding in Williams syndrome and autism with and without language impairment. Language Acquisition, 20, 133–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perovic, A., & Wexler, K. (2007). Complex grammar in Williams syndrome. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 21, 729–745. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philip, W., & Coopmans, P. (1996). The role of lexical feature acquisition in the development of pronominal anaphora. In W. Philip & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Amsterdam Series on Child Language Development (Vol. 5). Amsterdam: Instituut Algemene Taalwetenschap.Google Scholar
Reilly, J., Losh, M., Bellugi, U., & Wulfeck, B. (2004). Frog, where are you? Narratives in children with specific language impairment, early focal brain injury and Williams syndrome. Brain and Language, 88, 229–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T., & Reuland, E. (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 657–720.Google Scholar
Reuland, E. (2001). Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 439–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, M.L., Warren, S.F., & Betz, S.K. (2005). Language symptoms of developmental language disorders: An overview of autism, Down syndrome, fragile X, specific language impairment, and Williams syndrome. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 7–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, M.L., & Wexler, K. (1996). Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1239–1257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). Rice/Wexler Test of Early Grammatical Impairment. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Ring, M., & Clahsen, H. (2005). Distinct patterns of language impairment in Down’s syndrome and Williams syndrome: The case of syntactic chains. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18, 479–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J., Rice, M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2004). Tense marking in children with autism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 429–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanoudaki, E., & Varlokosta, S. (2014). Pronoun comprehension in individuals with Down syndrome: Deviance or delay? Journal of Speech , Language and Hearing Research, 57, 1442–1452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, R. (2009). Handbook of child language disorders. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sheng, L., & McGregor, K.K. (2010). Object and action naming in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1704–1719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, S.D., & Morris, C.A. (2005). Planning studies of etiology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 97–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spenader, J., Smits, E.J., & Hendriks, P. (2009). Coherent discourse solves the Pronoun Interpretation Problem. Journal of Child Language, 36, 23–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stathopoulou, N. (2009). The linguistic profile of Greek individuals with Down syndrome: Evidence from syntactic and morphological phenomena (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Essex, Colchester, UK.Google Scholar
Stavrakaki, S., & van der Lely, H.K.J. (2010). Production and comprehension of pronouns by Greek children with specific language impairment. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 189–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1981). On the nature of linguistic functioning in early infantile autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 11, 45–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1995). “Once upon a ribbit”: Stories narrated by autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 45–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). Language development in atypical children. In M. Barrett (Ed.), The development of language (pp. 311–348). Hove, Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Terzi, A., Marinis, T., Francis, K., & Kotsopoulou, A. (2012). Crosslinguistic differences in autistic children’s comprehension of pronouns: English vs. Greek. In K. Alia Biller, Y.E. Chung, & A.E. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 607–619). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Terzi, A., Marinis, T., Kotsopoulou, A., & Francis, K. (2014). Grammatical abilities of Greek-speaking children with autism, Language Acquisition, 21, 4–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, R., & Wexler, K. (1999). Principle B, VP ellipsis, and interpretation in child grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.M., & Stavrakaki, S. (1999). The effects of a morphosyntactic deficit in the determiner system: The case of a Greek SLI child. Lingua, 108, 31–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuller, L., Delage, H., Monjauze, C., Piller, A-G., & Barthez, M.-A. (2011). Clitic pronoun production as a measure of atypical language development in French. Lingua, 121, 421–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Lely, H.K.J. (1997). Narrative discourse in grammatical specific language impaired children: A modular language deficit? Journal of Child Language, 24, 221–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1998). SLI in children: Movement, economy and deficits in the computational-syntactic system. Language Acquisition, 7, 161–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Domain-specific cognitive systems: Evidence from grammatical SLI. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 53–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Lely, H.K.J., & Stollwerk, L. (1997). Binding theory and grammatical specific language impairment in children. Cognition, 62, 245–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varlokosta, S. (2000). Lack of clitic pronoun distinctions in the acquisition of principle B in child Greek. In S.C. Howell, S. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 738–748). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Varlokosta, S., & Nerantzini, M. (2012). Pronominal and anaphoric reference in Greek specific language impairment. In Z. Gavrilidou, A. Efthymiou, E. Thomadaki, & P. Kambakis-Vougiouklis (Eds.), Selected Papers of the 10th International Conference of Greek Linguistics (pp. 584–591). Komotini: Democritus University of Thrace.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Meir, Natalia & Rama Novogrodsky
2019. Prerequisites of Third-Person Pronoun Use in Monolingual and Bilingual Children With Autism and Typical Language Development. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
SKARABELA, BARBORA & MITSUHIKO OTA
2017. Two-year-olds but not younger children comprehend it in ambiguous contexts: Evidence from preferential looking. Journal of Child Language 44:1 ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.