Cover not available
Part of
Acquisition and Development of Hebrew: From infancy to adolescence
Edited by Ruth A. Berman
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 19] 2016
► pp. 69–94

Phonological development in Israeli Hebrew-learning infants and toddlers

Perception and production

| University of York
| Tel Aviv University
The chapter provides an overview of early receptive and productive phonological development in Israeli Hebrew. We report on perception studies which show that Hebrew-learning infants are familiar with the rhythms and phonotactic structures of Hebrew, as demonstrated by their preference for iambic words and for frequent word pattern-structures (miškalim). We also describe the emergence of languagespecific phonetic categories, demonstrated by the different responses of Hebrew and Arabic-learning infants. We then summarize findings from prior research regarding the phonological characteristics of the early words produced by Hebrew-learning toddlers. Examination of onset-less word forms produced by a 2-year-old child reveals that onset omission is especially frequent in iambic target words with codas. We discuss these findings from the perspective of wholeword phonology.
Keywords: codas, Infants, onsets, whole-word phonology, perception, phonetics, phonology, phonotactics, production, prosody, stress, toddlers, word forms
Published online: 25 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.19.03ker
References (88)
References
Adam, G. & Bat-El, O. 2008. Segmental effects on syllable selection: Evidence from Hebrew. In Language Acquisition and Development. Proceedings of GALA 2007, A. Gavarró & M.J. Freitas (eds), 1-11. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Allen, G.D. & Hawkins, S. 1978. The development of phonological rhythm. In Syllables and Segments, A. Bell & J.B. Hooper (eds), 173-185. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
. 1980. Phonological rhythm: Definition and development. Child Phonology 1: 227-256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, M. 2003. Hebrew stress: Can’t you hear those trochees? In Proceedings of the 26th Penn Linguistics Colloquium, E. Kaiser & S. Arunachalam (eds), 45-58. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Ben-David, A. 2001. Language Acquisition and Phonological Theory: Universal and Variable Processes Across Children and Across Languages. PhD dissertation, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Ben-David, A. & Berman, R.A. 2007. Israeli Hebrew Speech Acquisition. In The International Guide to Speech Acquisition, S. McLeod (ed), 437-456. New York NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Berman, R.A. 1977. Natural phonological processes at the one-word stage. Lingua 43: 1-21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1978. Modern Hebrew Structure. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects.Google Scholar
Best, C. & McRoberts G. 2003. Infant perception of nonnative consonant contrasts that adults assimilate in different ways. Language and Speech 46: 183-216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhaya Nair, R. 1991. Monosyllabic English or disyllabic Hindi? Indian Linguistics 52: 51-90.Google Scholar
Bolozky, S. 1982. Remarks on rhythmic stress in Modern Hebrew. Linguistics 18: 275-89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B. & Vihman, M.M. 1991. Adaptation to language: Evidence from babbling and first words in four languages. Language 67: 267-319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, E-G. 2012. Vowel harmony and universality in Hebrew acquisition. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 4: 7-29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colombo, J. & Bundy, R.S. 1981. A method for the measurement of infant auditory selectivity. Infant Behavior and Development 4: 219-223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.P., Abraham, J. & Berman, S. 1997. The development of infants' preference for motherese. Infant Behavior and Development 20: 477-488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.P. & Aslin, R.N. 1990. Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child Development 61: 1584-1595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Developmental differences in infant attention to the spectral properties of infant-directed speech. Child Development 65: 1663-1677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dar, M., Vihman, M.M. & Keren-Portnoy, T. under revision. An order effect in English infants’ response to an Urdu voiceless affricate contrast.
Engstrand, O., Williams, K. & Lacerda, F. 2003. Does babbling sound native? Listener responses to vocalizations produced by Swedish and American 12- and 18-month olds. Phonetica 60: 17-44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. 1985. Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development 8: 181-195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. & Kuhl, P.K. 1987. Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech. Infant Behavior and Development 10: 279-293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Floccia, C., Keren-Portnoy, T., DePaolis, R., Duffy, H., Delle Luche, C., Durrant, S., White, L., Goslin, J. & Vihman, M. 2016. A robust failure to replicate word segmentation findings in British English infants. Cognition 148: 1-9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A.D., Friedrich, M. & Christophe, A. 2007. Brain responses in 4-month-old infants are already language specific. Current Biology 17: 1208-1211 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedlander, S.S. & Wisdom, Z.B. 1971. Pre-verbal infants’ selective operant responses for different levels of auditory complexity and linguistic redundancy. Paper presented at the Annual General Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York NY.
Gafni, C. 2012. Child consonant harmony: Identification and properties. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 4: 30-54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenn, S.M., Cunningham, C.C. & Joyce, P.F. 1981. A study of auditory preferences on nonhandicapped infants with Down’s syndrome. Child Development 52: 1303-1307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glinert, L. 1989. The Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Goffman, L., Gerken, L. & Lucchesi, J. 2007. Relations between segmental and motor variability in prosodically complex nonword sequences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50: 444-458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Gomez, N. & Nazzi, T. 2012. Acquisition of nonadjacent phonological dependencies in the native language during the first year of life. Infancy 17: 498-524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Effects of phonotactic prior knowledge on infant word segmentation. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 56: 840-849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Gomez, N., Poltrock, S. & Nazzi, T. 2013. A “Bat” is easier to learn than a “Tab”: Effects of relative phonotactic frequency on infant word learning. PLoS ONE 8: e59601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grieser, D. & Kuhl, P.K 1989. Categorization of speech by infants: Support for speech-sound prototypes. Developmental Psychology 25: 577-588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grunwell, P. 1982. Clinical Phonology. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hallé, P.A., Boysson-Bardies, B. & Vihman, M.M. 1991. Beginnings of prosodic organization: Intonation and duration patterns of disyllables produced by Japanese and French infants. Language and Speech 34: 299-318.Google Scholar
Höhle, B., Bijeljac-Babic, R., Herold, B., Weissenborn, J. & Nazzi, T. 2009. The development of language specific prosodic preferences during the first half year of life: Evidence from German and French. Infant Behavior and Development 32: 262-274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P.W., Cutler, A. & Redanz, N.J. 1993. Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development 64: 675–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P.W., Houston, D.M. & Newsome, M. 1999. The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology 39: 159-207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karni, N. 2012. Minimizing faithfulness violation in the acquisition of Hebrew onset. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 4: 80-103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keren-Portnoy, T., Majorano, M. & Vihman, M.M. 2009. From phonetics to phonology: The emergence of first words in Italian. Journal of Child Language 36: 235-267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khattab, G. & Al-Tamimi, J. 2013. Influence of geminate structure on early Arabic templatic patterns. In The Emergence of Phonology: Whole Word Approaches, Cross-Linguistic Evidence, M.M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (eds), 374-414. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kishon-Rabin L., Harel T., Hildesheimer M. & Segal, O. 2010. Listening preference for the native language compared to an unfamiliar language in hearing and hearing-impaired infants after cochlear implantation. Otology and Neurotology 31: 1275-1280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kishon-Rabin, L., Taitelbaum, R., Muchnik, C., Gehtler, I., Kronenberg, J. & Hildesheimer, M. 2002. Development of speech perception and production in children with cochlear implants . The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Supplement 189: 85-90.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P.K., Conboy, B.T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M. & Nelson, T. 2008. Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: New data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 363: 979–1000. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P.K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S. & Iverson, P. 2006. Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science 9: 13–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P.K., Williams, K.A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K.N. & Lindblom, B. 1992. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255: 606-608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Maye, J., Werker, J. & Gerken, L.A. 2002. Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition 8: B101-B111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.L. & Eimas, P.D. 1996. Internal structure of voicing categories in early infancy. Perception and Psychophysics 58: 1157–1167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moon, C., Cooper, R.P. & Fifer, W.P. 1993. Two-day-olds prefer their native language. Infant Behavior and Development 16: 495-500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J. & Bijeljac-Babic, R. 2009. A perceptual equivalent of the labial-coronal effect in the first year of life. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126: 1440–1446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T., Dilley, L.C., Jusczyk, A.M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & Jusczyk, P.W. 2005. English-learning infants’ segmentation of verbs from fluent speech. Language and Speech 48: 279-298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T., Iakimova, G., Bertoncini, J., Frédonie, S. & Alcantara, C. 2006. Early segmentation of fluent speech by infants acquiring French: Emerging evidence for cross-linguistic differences. Journal of Memory and Language 54: 283–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oller, D.K., Wieman, L.A., Doyle, W.J. & Ross, C. 1976. Infant babbling and speech. Journal of Child Language 3: 1-11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polka, L., Colantonio, C. & Sundara, M. 2001. A cross-language comparison of /d/-/ð/ perception: Evidence for a new developmental pattern. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 5: 2190–2200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polka, L. & Sundara, M. 2012. Word segmentation in monolingual infants acquiring Canadian-English and Canadian-French: Native language, cross-language and cross-dialect comparisons. Infancy 17: 198-232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pons, F. & Bosch, L. 2010. Stress pattern preference in Spanish-learning infants: The role of syllable weight. Infancy 15: 223-245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D. 2006. Word-level morphology: A psycholinguistic perspective on linear formation in Hebrew nominals. Morphology 16: 127-148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saffran, J.R., Aslin, R.N. & Newport, E.L. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274: 1926-1928. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saffran, J.R., Werker, J. & Werner, L. 2006. The infant's auditory world: Hearing, speech, and the beginnings of language. In Handbook of Child Development, R. Siegler & D. Kuhn (eds), 58-108. New York NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Savinainen-Makkonen, T. 2007. Geminate template: A model for first Finnish words. First Language 27: 347-359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segal, O., Hejli-Assi, S. & Kishon-Rabin L. 2016. The effect of listening experience on the discrimination of /ba/ and /pa/ in Hebrew-learning and Arabic-learning infants. Journal of Infant Behavior and Development. 42: 86-99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segal, O., Houston, D. & Kishon-Rabin, L. 2015. Auditory Discrimination of Lexical Stress Patterns in Hearing-Impaired Infants with Cochlear Implants Compared with Normal Hearing: Influence of Acoustic Cues and Listening Experience to the Ambient Language. Ear and hearing 37: 225-234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segal, O., Keren-Portnoy, T. & Vihman, M.M. 2015. Infant Recognition of Hebrew Vocalic Word Patterns. Infancy 20: 208-236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segal, O. & Kishon-Rabin, L. 2011. Listening preference for child-directed speech versus nonspeech stimuli in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants after cochlear implantation. Ear and Hearing 32: 358-72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Evidence for language-specific influence on the preference of stress patterns in infants learning an Iambic language (Hebrew). Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 55: 1329-1341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segal, O., Nir-Sagiv, B., Kishon-Rabin L. & Ravid, D. 2009. Prosodic patterns in Hebrew child-directed speech. Journal of Child Language 36: 629-656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szreder, M. 2013. The acquisition of consonant clusters in Polish: A case study. The Emergence of Phonology: Whole Word Approaches, Cross-Linguistic Evidence, M.M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (eds), 343-361. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsao, F.-M., Liu, H.-M. & Kuhl, P.K. 2004. Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: A longitudinal study. Child Development 75: 1067–1084. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsao, F. -M., Liu, H. -M. & Kuhl, P.K. 2006. Perception of native and non-native affricate-fricative contrasts: Cross-language tests on adults and infants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120: 2285–2294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turk, A.E., Jusczyk, P.W. & Gerken, L. 1995. Do English-learning infants use syllable weight to determine stress? Language and Speech 38: 143-158.Google Scholar
Van Kampen, A., Parmaksiz, G., van de Vijver, R. & Höhle, B. 2008. Metrical and statistical cues for word segmentation: Vowel harmony and word stress as cues to word boundaries by 6- and 9-month-old Turkish learners. In Language Acquisition and Development, A. Gavarró & M.J. Freitas (eds), 313–324. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Vihman, M.M. 2014. Phonological Development: The First Two Years, 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vihman, M.M. & Croft, W. 2007. Phonological development: Toward a “radical” templatic phonology. Linguistics 45: 685-725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M.M., DePaolis, R.A. & Keren-Portnoy, T. 2014. The role of production in infant word learning. Language Learning 64 (Supplement 2): 121-140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M.M., Kay, E., Boysson-Bardies, B., Durand, C. & Sundberg, U. 1994. External Sources of Individual Differences? A Cross-Linguistic Analysis of the Phonetics of Mothers' Speech to 1-Year-Old Children, Developmental Psychology 30: 651-662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M.M. & Keren-Portnoy, T. (eds) 2013. The Emergence of Phonology: Whole Word Approaches, Cross-Linguistic Evidence. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vihman M.M., Macken, M.A., Miller, R., Simmons, H. & Miller, J. 1985. From babbling to speech: A re-assessment of the continuity issue. Language 61: 397-445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vouloumanos, A. & Werker, J.F. 2004. Tuned to the signal: The privileged status of speech for young infants. Developmental Science 7: 270–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Listening to language at birth: Evidence for a bias for speech in neonates. Developmental Science 10: 159-164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wauquier, S. & Yamaguchi, N. 2013. Templates in French. In The Emergence of Phonology: Whole Word Approaches, Cross-Linguistic Evidence, M.M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (eds), 317-342. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber, C., Hahne, A., Friedrich, M. & Friederici, A.D. 2004. Discrimination of word stress in early infant perception: Electrophysiological evidence. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 18: 149-161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werker, J.F., Gilbert, J.V.H., Humphrey, K. & Tees, R.C. 1981. Developmental aspects of cross language speech perception. Child Development 52: 349-355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werker, J.F. & Lalonde, C. 1988. Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology 24: 672–683. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werker, J.F. & Mcleod, P.J. 1989. Infant preference to both male and female infant-directed talk: A developmental study of attentional effective responsiveness. Canadian Journal of Psychology 43: 230-246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werker, J.F. & Tees, R.C. 1983. Developmental changes across childhood in the perception of nonnative sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology 37: 27S-286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development 7: 49-63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Influences on infant speech processing: Toward a new synthesis. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 509-535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalen, D.H., Levitt, A.G. & Wang, Q. 1991. Intonational differences between the reduplicative babbling of French- and English-learning infants. Journal of Child Language 18: 501-516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Aalto, Eija, Katri Saaristo-Helin & Suvi Stolt
2023. Auditory Word Recognition Ability in Babble Noise and Phonological Development in Children at 3;6 Years of Age. Language Learning and Development 19:2 ► pp. 230 ff. DOI logo
Vihman, Marilyn May, Mitsuhiko Ota, Tamar Keren-Portnoy, Rui Qi Choo & Shanshan Lou
2023. A Challenge to Whole-word Phonology? A Study of Japanese and Mandarin. Language Learning and Development 19:4 ► pp. 480 ff. DOI logo
Vihman, Marilyn M.
2022. How to learn more about how children learn languages: A commentary on Kidd and García (2022). First Language 42:6 ► pp. 827 ff. DOI logo
Segal, Osnat, Tamar Keren‐Portnoy & Marilyn Vihman
2020. Robust effects of stress on early lexical representation. Infancy 25:4 ► pp. 500 ff. DOI logo
Vihman, Marilyn
2018. Chapter 10. The development of prosodic structure. In The Development of Prosody in First Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 23], ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Vihman, Marilyn & Sophie Wauquier
2018. Chapter 1. Templates in child language. In Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 22], ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.