Cover not available
Part of
Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners
Edited by Maya Hickmann †, Edy Veneziano and Harriet Jisa
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 22] 2018
► pp. 219–242

Chapter 11
Referential features, speech genres and activity types

 | Laboratoire Langage, Systèmes, Discours, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3
 | Laboratoire Langage, Systèmes, Discours, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3
 | Laboratoire Langage, Systèmes, Discours, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3
 | Laboratoire Développement, Adaptation et Handicap, Université de Lorraine, Nancy
Based on a dialogic theoretical framework, this chapter explores the influence of speech genres and activities on the use of referring expressions. The study examines a corpus of 25 dialogues of French speaking children aged between 1;10 and 2;04 in various activities. Results show that referring expressions are not homogenously used throughout activities and genres. Everyday activities increase the use of nouns and strong demonstrative pronouns, games with toys positively affect the use of strong demonstrative pronouns and iconic material entails a more frequent use of clitic demonstratives and to a lesser extent of 3rd person pronouns. However, discourse in activities is made of various speech genres which strongly affect the use of clitic pronouns. Clitic demonstratives are preferred for labeling and evaluation but 3rd person pronouns are used for description and narratives. The discussion deals with the way these associations could be factors accounting for children’s early choice of referring expressions.
Keywords: referring expressions, pronouns, activities, speech, genres, dialogic perspective, language acquisition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Referring expressions in a French corpus
    • 2.1The distribution of referring expressions
    • 2.2Uses of referring expressions
  • 3.Referring expressions, activities and speech genres in family dialogues
    • 3.1Activities and referring expressions
    • 3.2Speech genres and referring expressions
  • 4.How can speech genres affect the acquisition and use of referring expressions?
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 22 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.12sal
References (51)
References
Allen, S. E. M. 2000. A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics 38(3): 483–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, M. 2008. Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. & Nir-Sagiv, B. 2004. Linguistic indicators of inter-genre differentiation in later language development. Journal of Child Language 31(2): 339–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bronckart, J. -P. 2004. Les genres de textes et leur contribution au développement psychologique. Langages 153: 98–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. 1983. Child's Talk; Learning to Use Language. New York NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
1985. The role of interaction formats in language acquisition. In Language and Social Situations, J. Forgas (ed.), 31–46. New York NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caët, S. 2013. Référence à soi et à l'interlocuteur chez des enfants francophones et anglophones et leurs parents. PhD dissertation, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3.Google Scholar
Chenu, F., Jisa, H. & Mazur-Palandre, A. 2012. Développement de la connectivité syntaxique à travers deux types de textes à l’oral et à l’écrit. Paper presented at the Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 2012. SHS Web of Conferences 1. DOI logo.
Clancy, P. M. 1996. Referential strategies and the co-construction of argument structure in Korean acquisition. Typological Studies in Language 33: 33–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cat, C. 2015. The cognitive underpinnings of referential abilities. In The Acquisition of Reference [Trends in Language Acquistisiton Research 15], L. Serratrice & S. E. M. Allen (eds), 263–283. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Weck, G. 1991. La Cohésion dans les Textes d'Enfants. Etude du Développement des Processus Anaphoriques. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Fox, B. A. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, F. 1984. Problèmes et esquisse méthodologique. In Conduites Linguistiques chez le Jeune Enfant, F. François, C. Hudelot & E. Sabeau-Jouannet, 13–116. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
1993. Pratiques de l’Oral. Dialogue, Jeu et Variations des Figures du Sens. Paris: Nathan Pédagogie.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1995. Coherence in text vs. coherence in mind. In Coherence in Spontaneous Text [Typological Studies in Language 31], M. A. Gernsbacher & T. Givón (eds), 59–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleason, J. B., Phillips, B. C., Ely, R. & Zaretsky, E. 2009. Alligators all around: The acquisition of animal terms in English and Russian. In Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura & S. Ozcaliskan (eds), 17–26. New York NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K. & Johnson, K. 2013. Children's use of referring expressions in spontaneous discourse: Implications for theory of mind development. Journal of Pragmatics 56: 43–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. 2003. Children's Discourse: Person, Space and Time across Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hughes, M. E. & Allen, S. E. 2013. The effect of individual discourse-pragmatic features on referential choice in child English. Journal of Pragmatics 56: 15–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jisa, H. & Stomqvist, S. 2002. Pragmatique et acquisitions tardives chez l'enfant: langage oral et langage écrit. In Pragmatique et Psychologie, J. Bernicot, A. Trognon, M. Guidetti & M. Musiol (eds), 257–265. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1985. Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes 1(1): 61–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In Language in the Inner City, W. Labov, 354–396. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar
Leaper, C. & Gleason, J. B. 1996. The relationship of play activity and gender to parent and child sex-typed communication. International Journal of Behavioral Development 19(4): 689–703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 1979. Activity types and language. Linguistics 17(5–6): 365–400.Google Scholar
Levy, E. T. & Nelson, K. 1994. Words in discourse: A dialectical approach to the acquisition of meaning and use. Journal of Child Language 21: 367–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E. 2010. Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua 120(11): 2546–2556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcos, H., Ryckebusch, C. & Rabain-Jamin, J. 2003. Adult's responses to young children's communicative gestures: joint achievement of speech acts. First Language 23(2): 213–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcos, H., Salazar Orvig, A., Bernicot, J., Guidetti, M., Hudelot, C. & Préneron, C. 2004. Apprendre à parler: Influence du mode de garde. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E. V. M., Theakston, A. L. & Tomasello, M. 2006. The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children's use of referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics 27: 403–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazur-Palandre, A. & Jisa, H. 2012. Introduire et développer l’information: une acquisition tardive? CogniTextes 7. <[URL]> (19 December 2016). DOI logo
Morgenstern, A. & Parisse, C. 2010. The Paris Corpus. French Language Studies 22(1): 7–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nashawati, S. 2010. Le développement des expressions référentielles chez le jeune enfant: Noms et pronoms dans des dialogues mère-enfant. PhD dissertation, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. 2007. Young Minds in Social Worlds: Experience, Meaning, and Memory. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ninio, A. & Snow, C. 1996. Pragmatic Development. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. & Dodsworth, P. 1991. A longitudinal analysis of young children's cohesion and noun specification in narratives. Journal of Child Language 18: 397–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A. 2003. L'inscription dialogique du jeune enfant: Évolution, diversité et hétérogénéité. TRANEL 38–39: 7–24.Google Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A. & Morgenstern, A. 2015. Acquisition and uses of pronouns in a dialogic perspective. In The Acquisition of Reference [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 15], L. Serratrice & S. E. M. Allen (eds), 155–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., Marcos, H., Morgenstern, A., Hassan, R., Leber-Marin, J. & Parès, J. 2010. Dialogical beginnings of anaphora: The use of third person pronouns before the age of 3. Journal of Pragmatics 42(7): 1842–1865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L. 2008. The role of discourse and perceptual cues in the choice of referential expressions in English preschoolers, school-age children, and adults. Language Learning and Development 4(4): 309–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skarabela, B., Allen, S. E. & Scott-Phillips, T. C. 2013. Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents. Journal of Pragmatics 56: 5–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2002. Things are what they do: Katherine Nelson's functional approach to language and cognition. Journal of Cognition & Development 3: 5–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Constructing a Language. A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Veneziano, E. & Sinclair, H. 1995. Functional changes in early child language: The appearance of references to the past and of explanations. Journal of Child Language 22: 557–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society, M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (eds). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. 1991. Voices of the Mind. Hemel Hemstead: Harverster Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Wittek, A. & Tomasello, M. 2005. Young Children's sensitivity to listener knowledge and perceptual context in choosing referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics 26(4): 541–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

da Silva-Genest, Christine, Marine Le Mené Guigourès & Caroline Masson
2024. Évaluation du langage oral : perspectives pour la recherche et la clinique. Éla. Études de linguistique appliquée N° 210:2 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Le Mené Guigourès, Marine, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Christine da Silva-Genest & Haydée Marcos
2024. Chapter 5. Young children’s experience of referentiality and nonreferentiality in dialogue. In (Non)referentiality in Conversation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 344], ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Le Mené, Marine, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Christine da Silva-Genest & Haydée Marcos
2023. The choice of referring expressions in adult-child dialogues. In Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series, 228], ► pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Masson, Caroline, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux & B. Hamma
2022. Parler à et avec les enfants en crèche : conduites langagières et dialogiques des adultes et des enfants en situation de lecture partagée et de jeu libre. SHS Web of Conferences 138 ► pp. 09008 ff. DOI logo
Hassan, Rouba, Geneviève de Weck, Stefano Rezzonico, Anne Salazar-Orvig & Elise Vinel
2021. Chapter 8. Variations in adult use of referring expressions during storytelling in different interactional settings. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne & Geneviève de Weck
2021. Chapter 11. The acquisition of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021. Chapter 1. A dialogical approach to the acquisition and usage of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Vinel, Elise, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Geneviève de Weck, Salma Nashawati & Somayeh Rahmati
2021. Chapter 10. The impact of speech genres on the use of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 288 ff. DOI logo
Da Silva Genest, Christine & Caroline Masson
2018. Corpus et pathologies du langage : du recueil à l’analyse de données pour une linguistique clinique et appliquée. Corpus :19 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Chapter 11. The acquisition of referring expressions: From formal factors to communicative experience. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 320 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.