Part of
Semantics in Language Acquisition
Edited by Kristen Syrett and Sudha Arunachalam
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 24] 2018
► pp. 178196
Akhtar, N.
(1999) Acquiring basic word order: Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 26, 339–356.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. V. M.
(2015) A Constructivist account of child language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), Handbook of language emergence (pp. 478–510). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., & Rowland, C. F.
(2009) Predicting children’s errors with negative questions: Testing a schema-combination account. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 225–266.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Rowland, C. F., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M.
(2006) Comparing different accounts of non-inversion errors in children’s non-subject wh-questions: ‘What experimental data can tell us?’ Journal of Child Language, 30, 519–557.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Clark, E. V.
(2011) When ‘on your feet’ is better than ‘feet’: Children’s word production is facilitated in familiar sentence-frames. Language Learning and Development, 7, 107–129.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Snider, N.
(2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 67–82.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arunachalam, S., & Waxman, S. R.
(2010) Meaning from syntax: Evidence from 2-year-olds. Cognition, 114, 442–446.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bannard, C., & Matthews, D.
(2008) Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science, 19, 241–248.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavin, E. L., & Growcott, C.
(2000) Infants of 24–30 months understand verb frames. In M. Perkins & S. Howard (Eds.), New directions in language development and disorders (pp. 169–177). Dordrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C., & Leivada, E.
(2013) Entangled parametric hierarchies: Problems for an overspecified Universal Grammar. PloS one, 8, e72357.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J. K., & Goldberg, A. E.
(2012) Young children fail to fully generalize a novel argument structure construction when exposed to the same input as older learners. Journal of Child language, 39, 457–481.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J. K., Gottschalk, E. A., & Goldberg, A. E.
(2009) Linking rule acquisition in novel phrasal constructions. Language Learning, 59, 64–89.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. J., Braine, M. D. S., Catalano, L., Brody, R. E., & Sudhalter V.
(1993) Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The Contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 76–95.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casenhiser, D., & Goldberg, A. E.
(2005) Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8, 500–508.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(2009) Children’s understanding of the agent-patient relations in the transitive construction: Cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German, and English. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 267–300.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K.
(2006) Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234–272.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Childers, J. B., & Tomasello, M.
(2001) The role of pronouns in young children’s acquisition of the English transitive construction. Developmental Psychology, 37, 739–748.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, S., & Gentner, D.
(2010) Where hypotheses come from: Learning new relations by structural alignment. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 356–373.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, R.
(1976) Report on methods of longitudinal data-collection. Journal of Child Language, 3, 457–459.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dodson, K., & Tomasello, M.
(1998) Acquiring the transitive construction in English: The role of animacy and pronouns. Journal of Child Language, 25, 555–574.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doumas, L. A., Hummel, J. E., & Sandhofer, C. M.
(2008) A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. Psychological Review, 115, 1–43.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, K.
(2001) The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. In D. Gentner, K. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 313–334). Cambridge, MA: Bradford.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Loewenstein, J.
(2002) Relational language and relational thought. In E. Amsel & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Language, literacy, and cognitive development: The development and consequences of symbolic communication (pp. 87–120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B.
(1995) Similarity is like analogy: Structural alignment in comparison. In C. Cacciari (Ed.), Similarity in language, thought and perception (pp. 111–147). Brussels: Brepols.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B.
(1997) Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45–56.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Medina, J.
(1998) Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition, 65, 263–297.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gertner, Y., & Fisher, C.
(2012) Predicted errors in children’s early sentence comprehension. Cognition, 124, 85–94.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Eisengart, J.
(2006) Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science, 17, 684–691.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D., & White, T. R.
(2007) Constructions as categories of language. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 70–86.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldwater, M. B., Bainbridge, R. & Murphy, G
(2016) Learning role-governed and thematic categories. Acta Psychologica, 164, 112–126.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldwater, M. B., Tomlinson, M. T., Echols, C. H., & Love, B. C.
(2011) Structural priming as structure‐Mapping: Children use analogies from previous utterances to guide sentence production. Cognitive Science, 35, 156–170.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldwater, M. B., & Echols, C. H.
in preparation). The progressive alignment of grammatical constructions: evidence from structural priming.
Goldwater, M. B., Friedman, S. E., Gentner, D. G., Forbus, K. F., Taylor, J. L M.
(2011) An analogical learning model of the development of thematic roles & structural priming. Poster presented at the 36th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.
Kidd, E., Bavin, E. L., & Rhodes, B.
(2001) Two-year-olds’ knowledge of verbs and argument structures. In M. Almgren, A. Barreña, M. J. Ezeizabarrena, I. Idiazabal, & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Research on child language acquisition: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language (pp. 1368–1382). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Kotovsky, L., & Gentner, D.
(1996) Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity. Child Development, 67, 2797–2822.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuehne, S., Forbus, K., Gentner, D., & Quinn, B.
(2000, August). SEQL: Category learning as progressive abstraction using structure mapping. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 4, pp. 286–291).
MacWhinney, B.
(2014) Item-based patterns in early syntactic development. In T. Herbst, H. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions, collocations, patterns (pp. 33–70). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Matthews, D., & Bannard, C.
(2010) Children’s production of unfamiliar word sequences is predicted by positional variability and latent classes in a large sample of child‐directed speech. Cognitive Science, 34, 465–488.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L.
(1990) Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 17, 357–374.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L. G., & Kako, E. T.
(1993) First contact in verb acquisition: Defining a role for syntax first contact in verb acquisition. Child Development, 64, 1665–1687.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noble, C., Iqbal, F., Lieven, E., & Theakston, A.
(2016) Converging and competing cues in the acquisition of syntactic structures: The conjoined agent intransitive. Journal of Child Language, 43, 811–842.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noble, C. H., Rowland, C. F., & Pine, J. M.
(2011) Comprehension of argument structure and semantic roles: Evidence from English-learning children and the forced-choice pointing paradigm. Cognitive Science, 35, 963–982.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onnis, L., Waterfall, H. R., & Edelman, S.
(2008) Learn locally, act globally: Learning language from variation set cues. Cognition, 109, 423–430.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. M.
(1983) The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. M.
(1993) Reanalyzing rote-learned phrases–Individual-differences in the transition to multi-word speech. Journal of Child Language, 20, 551–571.Google Scholar
Pozzan, L., Gleitman, L. R., & Trueswell, J. C.
(2016) Semantic ambiguity and syntactic bootstrapping: The case of conjoined-subject intransitive sentences. Language Learning and Development, 12, 14–41.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing R. Vienna, Austria: Foundation for Statistical Computing. < [URL]>
Reas, C., & Fry, B.
(2007) Processing: A programming handbook for visual designers and artists. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J.
(2006) Children’s development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(3), 249–273.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowland, C. F.
(2007) Explaining errors in children’s questions. Cognition, 104(1), 106–134.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sakas, W. G., & Fodor, J. D.
(2012) Disambiguating syntactic triggers. Language Acquisition, 19(2), 83–143.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M.
(2003) Testing the abstractness of children’s linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Science, 6(5), 557–567.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J. P., French, R., & Vezneva, M.
(2010) The development of analogy making in children: Cognitive load and executive functions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 1–19.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J. P., & Witt, A.
(2015) Young children’s learning of relational categories: Multiple comparisons and their cognitive constraints. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 643.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Constructing a language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Twomey, K. E., Chang, F., & Ambridge, B.
(2014) Do as I say, not as I do: A lexical distributional account of English locative verb class acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 73, 41–71.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wonnacott, E., Boyd, J. K., Thomson, J., & Goldberg, A. E.
(2012) Input effects on the acquisition of a novel phrasal construction in 5 year olds. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 458–478.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, S., & Fisher, C.
(2009) “Really? She blicked the baby?”: Two-year-olds learn combinatorial facts about verbs by listening. Psychological Science, 20, 619–626.DOI logoGoogle Scholar