References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aksu-Koc, A., Avci, G., Aydin, C., Sefer, N., & Yasa, Y. (2005). The relation between mental verbs and ToM performance: Evidence from Turkish children. Paper presented at the IASCL Convention, Berlin, July.
Apperly, I., & Butterfill, S. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review, 20, 521–536.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Apperly, I., & Robinson, E. J. (1998). Children’s mental representation of referential relations. Cognition, 67, 287–309. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baillargeon, R., Scott, R., & He, Z. (2010). False-belief understanding in infants. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 110–118. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H. (1995). Children talk about the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, R., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A cross-linguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloom, L., Rispoli, M., Gartner, B., & Hafitz, J. (1989). Acquisition of complementation. Journal of Child Language, 16, 101–120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brentano, F. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot. Online: <[URL]>
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2013). How to construct a minimal Theory of Mind. Mind & Language, 28, 606–637. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carey, S. (2004). Bootstrapping and the origin of concepts. Daedalus, 133, 59–68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carruthers, P. (1996). Simulation and self-knowledge: A defence of theory-theory. In P. Carruthers & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheung, H., Hsuan-Chih, C., Creed, C. Ng, L., Ping Wang, S. & Mo, L. (2004). Relative roles of general and complementation language in theory-of-mind development: Evidence from Cantonese and English. Child Development, 75, 1155–1170. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, E. V., & Sengul, C. J. (1978). Strategies in the acquisition of deixis. Journal of Child Language, 5, 457–475. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, J. (2000). Theory of Mind, Logical Form and eliminativism. Philosophical Psychology, 13, 465–490. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dale, P., & Crain-Thoreson, C. (1993). Pronoun reversals: Who, when, and why? Journal of Child Language, 20, 573–589. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Villiers, J. G. (1999). On acquiring the structural representations for false complements. In B. Hollebrandse (Ed.), New perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 191–236). Amherst, MA: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Villiers, J. G. (2005). Can language acquisition give children a point of view? In J. W. Astington & J. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for Theory of Mind. (pp. 189–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Villiers, J. G. (2007) The interface of language and Theory of Mind. Lingua, 117, 1858–1878. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Villiers, P. A., & de Villiers, J. G. (1974). On this, that and the other: Non-egocentrism in very young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 438–447. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. (2009). Complements enable representation of the contents of false beliefs: Evolution of a theory of Theory of Mind. In S. Foster-Cohen (Ed.), Language acquisition (pp. 169–195). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Villiers, P. A., de Villiers, J. G., Lindley, E., & Chen, M. (2015). Language, inhibitory control, and explicit false belief understanding: A longitudinal structural equation model. Poster presentation at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Convention, Philadelphia, PA.
de Villiers, J. G., Garfield, J., Gernet Girard, H., Roeper, T., & Speas, P. (2009). Evidentials in Tibetan: Acquisition, semantics and cognitive development. In S. Fitneva & Matsui, T. (Eds.), Evidentiality: A window into language and development. Special issue of New Directions for Adolescent and Child Development 125: 29–48.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Villiers, J. G., Roeper, T., Harrington, E., & Gadilauskas, E. (2012). Tense and Truth in children’s question answering. In A. Biller, E. Chung, & A. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 152–163). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Villiers, J. G., Nordmeyer, A., & Kravitz, M. (2010). Maintaining a point of view across multiple pronoun switches. Poster presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition–North America, Toronto.
de Villiers, J. G., & Pyers, J. (2002). Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false belief understanding. Cognitive Development, 17, 1037–1060. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Villiers, J. G., & Roeper, T. (2016). The acquisition of complements. In J. Lidz, W. Snyder, & J. Pater (Eds.), Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics (pp. 279–309). Oxford: Oxford University press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Villiers, J. G., Roeper, T., & Vainikka, A. (1990). The acquisition of long distance rules. In L. Frazier & J. G. de Villiers (Eds.), Language processing and acquisition (pp. 257–297). Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, H., & Tomasello. M. (2001) The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 1–45. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dunn, J., & Brophy, M. (2005). Communication, relationships, and individual differences in children–s understanding of mind. In J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for Theory of Mind (pp. 50–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fay, W. (1979). Personal pronouns and the autistic child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 247–260. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fenici, M. (2014) A simple explanation of apparent early mindreading: Infants’ sensitivity to goals and gaze direction. Phenomenology in Cognitive Science, 14, 497–515. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. (1975). Santa Cruz lectures on deixis, 1971. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. (1971/1997). Coming and going. Lectures on deixis. Distributed by the Indiana Linguistics Club. Available online: <[URL]>
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frege, G. (1948). Sense and reference. The Philosophical Review, 57, 209–230. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garrett, E. (2001). Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, CA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Girouard, P., Ricard, M., & Decarie, T. G. (1997). The acquisition of personal pronouns in French-speaking and English-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 24, 311–326. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Golinkoff, R.M., de Villiers, J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Iglesias, A., & Wilson, M.S. (2017). User’s manual for the Quick Interactive Language Screener ™ (QUILS™): A measure of vocabulary, syntax, and language acquisition skills in young children. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordon, R. M. (1986). Folk psychology as simulation. Mind and Language, 1, 158–171. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gu, C. C., & Roeper, T. (2011) Acquisition arguments for a general point of view as an alternative to relativism and subjectivity (Unpublished manuscript). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, C. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2003). The influence of language on Theory of Mind: A training study. Developmental Science, 6, 346–359. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, P. (2005). Conversation, pretense, and Theory of Mind. In J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for Theory of Mind (pp. 70–83). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hendriks, P., & Spenader, J. (2005/2006). When production precedes comprehension: An optimization approach to the acquisition of pronouns. Language Acquisition, 13, 319–348. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hinzen, W. (2013). Naturalizing pluralism about truth. In C. Wright & N. Pedersen (Eds.), Truth and pluralism (pp. 213–237). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollebrandse, B. (2000). The acquisition of sequence of tense (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Hout, A., Harrigan, K., & de Villiers, J. G. (2010). Asymmetries in the acquisition of definite and indefinite noun phrases. In P. Hendriks & C. Koster (Eds.), Asymmetries in child language. Special issue of Lingua, 120, 1973–1990.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutto, D. D. (2007). Folk psychological narratives: The social basis of understanding reasons. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kamawar, D., & Olson, D. R. (1999). Children’s representational theory of language: The problem of opaque contexts. Cognitive Development, 14, 531–548. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981). A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, W. (1998). Assertion and finiteness. In N. Dittmar & Z. Penner (Eds.), Issues in the theory of language acquisition: Essays in honor of Jürgen Weissenborn (pp. 225–245). Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasersohn, P. (2005). Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28, 643–686. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lewis, S., Hacquard, V., & Lidz, J. (2013). The semantics and pragmatics of belief reports in preschoolers. In A. Chereches (Ed.) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 22 (pp. 247–267). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, J. W. (2010). A tenseless analysis of mandarin Chinese revisited: A response to Sybesma 2007. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(2), 305–329. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, T-H. J. (2011). Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Syntax, 14, 48–73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lohmann, H., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study. Child Development, 74, 1130–1144. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Low, J., & Watts, J. (2013). Attributing false beliefs about object identity reveals a signature blind spot in humans‘ efficient mind-reading system. Psychological Science, 24, 30–311. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milligan, K., Astington, J., & Dack, L. (2007). Language and Theory of Mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 79, 622–646. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nelson, K. (2005). Language pathways into the community of minds. In J. Astington & J. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for Theory of Mind (pp. 26–49). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Connor, A. Burgin, C., de Villiers, J. G., Speas, P., & Roeper, T. (2007). How children coordinate multiple deictic terms in sentences. Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, April.
Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308, 255–258. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oshima-Takane, Y. (1988). Children learn from speech not addressed to them: The case of personal pronouns. Journal of Child language, 15, 95–108. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oshima-Takane, Y. (1999). The learning of first and second person pronouns in English. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oshima-Takane, Y., Takane, Y., & Shultz, T. R. (1999). The learning of first and second person pronouns in English: Network models and analysis. Journal of Child Language, 26, 545–575. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pearson, H. (2015). Attitude verbs (Unpublished manuscript). Queen Mary University of London. Available online at semanticsarchive.net![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perner, J., Zauner, P., & Sprung, M. (2005). What does ‘that’ have to do with point of view? The case of conflicting desires and ‘want’ in German. In J. W. Astington & J. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for Theory of Mind (pp. 220–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Potts, C. (2007). The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics, 33, 165–197. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pyers, J. E., & Senghas, A. (2009). Language promotes false-belief understanding evidence from learners of a new sign language. Psychological Science, 20, 805–812. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quine, W. (1956). Quantifiers and propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 53, 177–187. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richards, B. (1976). Adverbs: From a logical point of view. Synthese, 32, 329–372. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roeper, T. (2007). The prism of grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roeper, T., & de Villiers, J. G. (1991). Ordered decisions in the acquisition of wh-questions. In H. Goodluck, J. Weissenborn, & T. Roeper (Eds.), Theoretical issues in language development (pp. 191–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roeper, T., & de Villiers, J. G. (2011). The acquisition path for wh-questions. In J. G. de Villiers & T. Roeper (Eds.), Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition (pp. 186–246). Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruffman, T., Slade, L., Rowlandson, K., Rumsey, C., & Garnham, A. (2003). How language relates to belief, desire and emotion understanding. Cognitive Development, 18, 139–158. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Russell, J. (1987). “Can we say…?” Children’s understanding of intensionality. Cognition, 25, 289–308. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schick, B., de Villiers, P. A., de Villiers J. G., & Hoffmeister, R. (2007). Language and false belief reasoning; A study of deaf children. Child Development, 78, 376–398. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scott, R. M., Richman, J. C., & Baillargeon, R. (2015). Infants understand deceptive intentions to implant false beliefs about identity: New evidence for early mentalistic reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 82, 32–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Segal, G. (1998). Representing representations. In P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (Eds.), Language and thought (pp. 146–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Southgate, V., Senju A., & Csibra, G. (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds. Psychological Science, 18, 587–92. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Southgate, V. (2013). Early manifestations of mind reading. In S. Baron-Cohen & H. Tager-Flusberg (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience (pp. 3–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Speas, M. (2004). Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua, 114, 255–276. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stephenson, T. (2007). Towards a theory of subjective meaning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sybesma, R. (2007). Whether we Tense-agree overtly or not. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 580–587. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tager-Flusberg, H., & Joseph, R. (2005). How language facilitates the acquisition of false belief in children with autism. In J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for Theory of Mind (pp. 298–318). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tanz, C. (1983). Studies in the acquisition of deictic terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thomas, E. (2010). Pronoun differentiation in young children: An eyetracker study (BA honors thesis). Smith College.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Cleave, M., & Gauker, C. (2010). Linguistic practice and false belief tasks. Mind & Language, 25, 298–328. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)