This pilot study examines the recent phenomenon of tablet interpreting. Based on in-depth interviews with six practitioners, which
were transcribed and analyzed inductively, the article presents an overview of software, tools, and technology that interpreters
currently utilize in their work. Qualitative and quantitative results demonstrate regular, effective tablet use in various
consecutive interpreting settings. Participants feel that these tools meet their needs and outstrip the functionalities offered by
pen and paper in most contexts. This study compiles best practices for tablet interpreting, discusses their benefits and
challenges, and describes features to consider when assessing new and existing tablets, applications, and styluses. The data
underscore the need for training in this budding field, which represents a key area for future research and professional
practice.
2011 “the interpreting wars (or 7 ‘wartime’ survival tips for the booth).” Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Alyahya, Suzan and James E. Gall
2012 “iPads in education: A qualitative study of students’ attitudes and experiences.” In Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2012, ed. by Tel Amiel and Brent Wilson. Chesapeake, Virginia: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Behl, Holly
2013a “The paperless interpreter experiment: Part I.” Retrieved from [URL] Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Behl, Holly
2013b “The paperless interpreter experiment: Part II.” Retrieved from [URL] Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Behl, Holly
2015 “The paperless interpreter experiment Part III: Microsoft Surface Pro 4.” Retrieved from [URL] Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Brinkmann, Svend
2013Qualitative Interviewing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Camayd-Freixas, Erik
2005 “A revolution in consecutive interpreting: Digital voice-recorder-assisted CI.” The ATA Chronicle 341: 40–46.
Corsellis, Ann
2008Public Service Interpreting. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Crowson, Matthew G., Russel Kahmke, Marisa Ryan and Richard Scher
2015 “Utility of daily mobile tablet use for residents on an otolaryngology head & neck surgery inpatient service.” Journal of Medical Systems 40(55).
Dimond, Tom
1957 “Devices for reading handwritten characters.” In Proceedings from the Eastern Joint Computer Conference, 232–237.
Drechsel, Alexander
2017The Tablet Interpreter. 2017 ed. Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Drechsel, Alexander and Holly Behl
2016 “Kiss paper goodbye: Tablet technology for consecutive and simultaneous interpreting.” Paper presented at the ATA 57th Annual Conference, San Francisco, California, November 5, 2016.
Drechsel, Alexander and Goldsmith, Joshua
In press. “Tablet Interpreting: The use of mobile devices in interpreting.” In CIUTI-Forum 2016: Equitable Education through intercultural communication: Role and responsibility for non-state actors ed. by Martin Forstner and Hannelore Lee-Jahnke Frankfurt am Main Peter Lang
Dündar, Hakan and Murat Akçayir
2014 “Implementing tablet PCs in schools: Students’ attitudes and opinions.” Computers in Human Behavior 321: 40–46.
Durand, Claude
2014 “Consecutive notes, symbols and the use of the notepad.” Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Eaton, Nick
2010 “The iPad/tablet PC market defined?” Seattle Pi. Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 19 August 2018.
El-Metwally, Maha
2017 “Consec-Simo as a tool for Consecutive Interpreting.” Webinar presented online through eCPD webinars, September19 2017.
2002 “Traditional vs. ‘simultaneous’ consecutive.” SCIC News 291: 6–7.
Gillies, Andrew
2005Note-taking for Consecutive Interpreting: A Short Course. Oxford: Alden Press.
Goldsmith, Joshua
2017A comparative user evaluation of tablets and tools for consecutive interpreters. In Proceedings from the Translating and the Computer 39 conference, ed. by João Esteves-Ferreira, Juliet Macabn, Ruslan Mitkov, and Olaf-Michael Stefanov, 40–50. Geneva: Tradulex.
Goldsmith, Joshua and Alexander Drechsel
2016 “Tablet interpreting: Tips, tools and applications to make the most of your tablet while interpreting.” Webinar presented at the Proz 2016 Virtual Conference for International Translation Day, 30 September 2016. Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Goldsmith, Joshua and Josephine Holley
2015Consecutive Interpreting 2.0: The Tablet Interpreting Experience. Unpublished M.A. thesis. University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Gomes, Miguel
2002 “Digitally mastered consecutive: An interview with Michele Ferrari.” Lingua franca 5–6: 6–10.
Hale, Sandra
2007Community Interpreting. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hamidi, Miriam and Franz Pöchhacker
2007 “Simultaneous consecutive interpreting: A new technique put to the test.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs 52(2): 276–289.
Herbert, Jean
1952Manuel de l’interprète: Comment on devient interprète de conférences. Geneva: Libraire de l’Université.
Hof, Michelle
2011 “Of notepads and writing utensils.” Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Hof, Michelle
2012 “iPad: The ideal boothmate.” Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Hursh, Tony
2005 “Tablet PCs for classroom use: Technology and application.” Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 15 October 2015.
Kvale, Steinar
1996InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Lombardi, John
2003 “DRAC interpreting: Coming soon to a courthouse near you?” Proteus 12(2): 7–9.
McNamara, Carter
2009 “General guidelines for conducting research interviews.” Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Merriam, Sharan B.
2009Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Navarro-Hall, Esther
2014 “Esther Navarro-Hall: Sim-Consec™ con Smartpen.” Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 18 August 2018.
Nguyen, Lemai, Siew Mee Barton and Linh Thuy Nguyn
2014 “iPads in higher education – Hype and hope.” British Journal of Educational Technology 46(1): 190–203.
Oceguera López, Patricia
2017El uso de aplicaciones para tablets en la toma de notas del intérprete. Unpublished BA thesis. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexico.
Orlando, Marc
2010 “Digital pen technology and consecutive interpreting: Another dimension in note-taking training and assessment.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 151: 71–86.
Orlando, Marc
2013 “Interpreting training and digital pen technology.” [URL]April8 2018 Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 18 August 2018.
Orlando, Marc
2014 “A study on the amenability of digital pen technology in a hybrid mode of interpreting: Consec-simul with notes.” Translation & Interpreting 6(2): 39–54.
Orlando, Marc
2015a “Digital pen technology and interpreter training, practice and research: Status and trends.” In Interpreter Education in the Digital Age, ed. by Suzanne Ehrlich and Jemina Napier, 125–152. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Orlando, Marc
2015b “Implementing digital pen technology in the consecutive interpreting classroom.” In To know how to suggest…approaches to teaching conference interpreting, ed. by Dörte Andres and Martina Behr, 171–199. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
Orlando, Marc
2016Training 21st Century Translators and Interpreters: At the Crossroads of Practice, Research and Pedagogy. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
Paone, Matteo Domenico
2016Mobile Geräte beim Simultandolmetschen mit besonderem Bezug auf Tablets. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Vienna, Austria.
Plano Clark, Vicki L., and Kimberly Galt
2009 “Using a mixed methods approach to strengthen instrument development and validation.” Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Pharmacists Association, San Antonio, Texas.
Rosado, Tony
2013 “Note-taking with iPad: Making our life easier.” Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Rozan, Jean-François
1956La prise de notes en interprétation consécutive. Geneva: Libraire de l’Université Georg.
Ryan, Gery and H. Russell Bernard
2003 “Techniques to identify themes.” Field Methods 15(1): 85–109.
Schedeen, Jesse
2010 “The history of the tablet PC.” IGN. Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Schooley, Benjamin, Steven Walczak, Neset Hikmet and Nitin Patel
2016 “Impacts of mobile tablet computing on provider productivity, communications and the process of care.” International Journal of Medical Informatics 881: 62–70.
2018 “Shipment forecast of laptops, desktop PCs and tablets worldwide from 2010 to 2022 (in million units).” Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Tarabocchia, Laura
1985L’annotazione grafica nell’interpretazione consecutive. Trieste: Università degli Studi di Trieste.
Tipton, Rebecca and Olgierda Furmanek
2016Dialogue Interpreting: A Guide to Interpreting in Public Services and the Community. New York: Routledge.
Torres-Díaz, María Gracia
1998Manual de Interpretación Consecutiva. Malaga: Universidad de Málaga.
Turner, Daniel W., III
2010 “Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators.” The Qualitative Report 15(3): 754–760.
Valenzuela, Dapzury and Pallavi Shrivastava
2002 “Interview as a method for qualitative research.” Retrieved from [URL]. Last accessed 19 August 2018.
Vanhecke, Katrin and Julia Lobato Patricio
2009La enseñanza-aprendizaje de la interpretación consecutiva: Una propuesta didáctica. Granada: Comares.
Vivas, Jose
2003 “Simultaneous consecutive: Report on the comparison session of June 11, 2003.” SCIC B4/JV D2003, Brussels, European Commission, Joint Interpreting and Conference Service.
Ware, Willis H.
2008RAND and the information evolution: A history in essays and vignettes. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Wilkinson, Kate and Phil Barter
2016 “Do mobile learning devices enhance learning in Higher Education anatomy classrooms?” Journal of Pedagogical Development 6(1): 14–23.
Yaman, Hakan, Erdinç Yavuz, Adem Er, Ramazan Vural, Yalçin Albayrak, Ahmet Yardimci and Özcan Aslikan
2015 “The use of mobile smart devices and medical apps in the family practice setting.” Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 22(2): 290–296. .
Yanikoglu, Berrin and Aytac Gogus
2017 “Use of handwriting recognition technologies in tablet-based learning modules for first grade education.” Educational Technology Research and Development 65(5): 1369–1388.
Yeung, Michelle and Chung Haejung
2011 “iPEP talk: Pedagogical conversations from the iPad Exploration Project.” Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, ed. by Matthew Koehler and Punya Mishra, 3036–3041. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
2022. Use of Computer-Assisted Interpreting Tools in Conference Interpreting Training and Practice During COVID-19. In Translation and Interpreting in the Age of COVID-19 [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 9], ► pp. 331 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.