Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation and Interpreting Studies
Vol. 14:1 (2019) ► pp.39–60

The fuzzy interface between censorship and self-censorship in translation

| Shenzhen University | Beijing Foreign Studies University
The present research explores how the self-censoring mechanism is established in the translator’s mind and how this internal mechanism interfaces with external, institutional censorial policies to affect both the process and the outcome of a translation. The paper begins with a discussion of the ubiquitous nature of censorship and how the translator internalizes various coercive censorial forces. Based on detailed case studies of three well-known censorship/ self-censorship-affected Chinese translations – those of Lolita, Animal Farm, and Deng Xiaoping – this research finds that when certain values, ideologies, cultural practices and moral presuppositions become internalized by translators, their censorial behavior is no longer a coerced option but an active choice of their own, and also that there is often no clear dividing line between what is coerced (censoring) and what is one’s own (self-censoring) action in contexts where ‘politically/ culturally sensitive’ source texts are bound to be scrutinized by the censor’s/ self-censor’s eye before they enter the translations market.
Keywords: censorship, self-censorship, fuzzy interface, cultural politics, Chinese context
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The ubiquitous nature of censorship in translation
  • Self-censorship in translation and the invisible hand of the censor
  • Case study: Three censorship-/self-censorship-affected translations
    • Overview
    • Textual analysis
    • Critical reflections
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 April 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.00029.tan
References (22)
References
Billiani, Francesca (ed). 2007. Modes of Censorship and Translation: National Contexts and Diverse Media. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Boase-Beier, Jean and Michael Holman (eds). 1999. The Practices of Literary Translation: Constraints and Creativity. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power, ed. by John B. Thompson and trans. by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Siobhan. 2007. “Examining self-censorship: Zola’s Nana in English translation.” In Modes of Censorship and Translation: National Contexts and Diverse Media, ed. by Francesca Billiani, 205–234. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Camus, Maria del Carmen Camus. 2008. “Pseudonyms, pseudotranslation and self-censorship in the narrative of the West during the Franco dictatorship.” In Translation and Censorship in Different Times and Landscapes, ed. by Teresa Seruya and Maria Lin Moniz, 147–162. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Escolar, Marisa. 2011. “Contaminating Conversions: Narrating Censorship, Translation, Fascism.” Ph.D. dissertation, UC Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
Gibbels, Elisabeth. 2009. “Translators, the tacit censors.” In Translation and Censorship: Patterns of Communication and Interference, ed. by Eiléan Ní Chuilleanáin, Cormac Ó Cuilleanáin and David Parris, 57–75. Dublin: Four Courts Press.Google Scholar
Holman, Michael and Boase-Beier, Jean. 1999. “Introduction.” In The Practices of Literary Translation: Constraints and Creativity, ed. by Jean Boase-Beier and Michael Holman, 1–17. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Kuhiwczak, Piotr. 2009. “Censorship as a collaborative project: a systemic approach.” In Translation and Censorship: Patterns of Communication and Interference, ed. by Eiléan Ní Chuilleanáin, Cormac Ó Cuilleanáin and David Parris, 46–56. Dublin: Four Courts Press.Google Scholar
Merkle, Denise. 2002. “Presentation.” Special issue of TTR, Censorship and Translation in the Western World 15(2): 9–18.Google Scholar
(ed). 2002. Special issue of TTR, Censorship and Translation in the Western World 15(2).Google Scholar
(ed). 2010. Special issue of TTR, Censorship and Translation within and beyond the Western World 23(2).Google Scholar
Merkle, Denise, Carol O’Sullivan, Luc van Doorslaer and Michaela Wolf (eds). 2010. The Power of the Pen. Translation and Censorship in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Vienna: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Ní Chuilleanáin, Eiléan, Cormac Ó Cuilleanáin and David Parris (eds). 2009. Translation and Censorship: Patterns of Communication and Interference. Dublin: Four Courts Press.Google Scholar
Olshanskaya, Natalia. 2008. “Ukraine: translating the wars.” In Translation and Censorship in Different Times and Landscapes, ed. by Teresa Seruya and Maria Lin Moniz, 252–261. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Matthew. 2007. Semi-censorship in Dryden and Browning. In Modes of Censorship and Translation: National Contexts and Diverse Media, ed. by Francesca Billiani, 187–204. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Rundle, Christopher. 2010. Publishing Translations in Fascist Italy. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rundle, Christopher, and Kate Sturge. 2010. Translation Under Fascism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seruya, Teresa. 2008. “Foreword.” In Translation and Censorship in Different Times and Landscapes, ed. by Teresa Seruya and Maria Lin Moniz, xi–xix. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Seruya, Teresa and Maria Lin Moniz (eds). 2008. Translation and Censorship in Different Times and Landscapes. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Tan, Zaixi. 2015. “Censorship in translation: The case of the People’s Republic of China.” Neohelicon: Acta comparationis litterarum universarum. 42(1): 313–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tymoczko, Maria. 2009. “Censorship and self-censorship in translation: ethics and ideology, resistance and collusion.” In Translation and Censorship: Patterns of Communication and Interference, ed. by Eiléan Ní Chuilleanáin, Cormac Ó Cuilleanáin and David Parris, 24–45. Dublin: Four Courts Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Wai-on, Law
2023. Translation Trainees’ Self-censorship and its Pedagogical Implications: A Triangulated Investigation in Hong Kong. TTR 36:1 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Dingkun
2020. Censorship and Manipulation in Audiovisual Translation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Audiovisual Translation and Media Accessibility [Palgrave Studies in Translating and Interpreting, ], ► pp. 621 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.