Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation and Interpreting Studies
Vol. 14:3 (2019) ► pp.333–350

Sociological formation and reception of translation

The case of Kinkley’s translation of Biancheng

ORCID logo | University of Macau
 | Shanghai Jiaotong University
This study draws on Bourdieu’s conceptualization of the international circulation of ideas to examine the sociological formation process of a translation. Taking the translated Chinese novel Border Town as an example, this study investigates the three phases of that process: selection; labeling and classification; and reading and reception. It discovers that the first two phases have created favorable conditions for the reception of the translated novel, but the translation was not well received. This article argues that the reception of a translation depends on the success of every phase of the sociological formation process. The reception of a translation is constructed and consecrated through the joint efforts of different agents in each phase. Only through a holistic sociological consideration of the dynamics of the formation process can we reach a real understanding of the reception of a translated work.
Keywords: sociology of translation, sociological formation process, reception, literary translation, Border Town
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Bourdieu’s conceptualization of the conditions of international circulation of ideas
  • The sociological formation process of the translation of Biancheng
    • The selection process
    • The labeling and classification of Border Town
    • The reception of Border Town
  • Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.19039.xu
References (50)
References
Alvstad, Cecilia and Alexandra Assis Rosa. 2015. “Voice in retranslation: An overview and some trends.” Target 27(1): 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bielsa, Esperança. 2013. “Translation and the international circulation of literature.” The Translator 19(2): 157–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boll, Tom. 2016. “Penguin books and the translation of Spanish and Latin American poetry, 1956–1979.” Translation and Literature 25(1): 28–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. “The social conditions of the international circulation of ideas.” In Bourdieu: A Critical Reader, ed. by Richard Shusterman, 220–28. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Buzelin, Hélène. 2007. “Translations ‘in the making.’” In Constructing a Sociology of Translation, ed. by Michaela Wolf and Alexandra Fukari, 135–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “How devoted can translators be? Revisiting the subservience hypothesis.” Target 26(1): 63–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ching, Ti and Robert Payne (eds). 1947. The Chinese Earth: Stories by Shen Congwen. London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.Google Scholar
Casanova, Pascale. 2004. The World Republic of Letters. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael Scott. 1991. “The place of literary translation in American higher education.” Translation Review 36–37(1): 16–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentzler, Edwin. 2002. “Translation, poststructuralism, and power.” In Translation and Power, ed. by Maria Tymoczko and Edwin Gentzler, 195–218. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Gentzler, Edwin and Maria Tymoczko. 2002. “Introduction.” In Translation and Power, ed. by Maria Tymoczko and Edwin Gentzler, xi–xxviii. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Gouanvic, Jean-Marc. 2005. “A Bourdieusian theory of translation, or the coincidence of practical instances: Field, ‘habitus,’ capital and ‘illusio.’” The Translator 11(2): 147–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Outline of a sociology of translation informed by the ideas of Pierre Bourdieu.” MonTI 21: 119–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gunn, Edward M. 2013. “US scholarship on modern Chinese literature.” In A Scholarly Review of Chinese Studies in North America, ed. by Haihui Zhang, Zhaohui Xue, Shuyong Jiang, and Gary Lance Lugar, 344–76. Ann Arbor: Association for Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Hsia, C. T. 1961/1999. A History of Modern Chinese Fiction, 1917–1957. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
1988. “Classical Chinese literature: Its reception today as a product of traditional culture.” Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews (CLEAR) 10(1/2): 133–52.Google Scholar
Inghilleri, Moira. 2003. “Habitus, field and discourse.” Target 15(2): 243–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “The sociology of Bourdieu and the construction of the ‘object’ in translation and interpreting studies.” The Translator 11(2): 125–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kershaw, Angela. 2010. “Sociology of literature, sociology of translation: The reception of Irène Némirovsky’s Suite française in France and Britain.” Translation Studies 3(1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinkley, Jeffrey. 1983. “ The Chinese Earth. By Shen Ts’ung-Wen. Translated by Ching Ti and Robert Payne. New York: Columbia University Press, Morningside Edition, 1982.” The Journal of Asian Studies 42(3): 637–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1987. The Odyssey of Shen Congwen. Standford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(ed). 1995. Imperfect Paradise: Stories by Shen Congwen. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
(trans). 2009. Border Town: A Novel. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2014. “English translations of Shen Congwen’s masterwork, Biancheng (Border Town).” Asian and African Studies 23(1): 37–59.Google Scholar
Kroll, Paul W. 2002. “Reflections on recent anthologies of Chinese literature in translation.” The Journal of Asian Studies 61(3): 985–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Lydia. 1997. “ Imperfect Paradise: Stories by Shen Congwen (review).” China Review International 4(1): 250–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinetti, Cristina and Margaret Rose. 2013. “Process, practice and landscapes of reception: An ethnographic study of theatre translation.” Translation Studies 6(2): 166–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meylaerts, Reine. 2010. “Habitus and self-image of native literary author-translators in diglossic societies.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 5(1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nie, Hualing. 1972. Shen Ts’ung-wen. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Gisèle. 2003. “The literary field between the state and the market.” Poetics 31(5/6): 441–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Translation and the field of publishing.” Translation Studies 1(2): 154–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sela-Sheffy, Rakefet. 2008. “The translators’ personae: Marketing translatorial images as pursuit of capital.” Meta 53(3): 609–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shan, Te-hsing. 2012. “Text, context, and dual contextualization: Personal reflections on a thick translation of Gulliver’s Travels .” In China and its Others: Knowledge Transfer through Translation, 1829–2010, ed. by James St. André and Peng Hsiao-yen. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Congwen. 2004. Beautiful Xiangxi: A Photographic Journey of Hunan through the Pen of Shen Congwen. Pleasantville, NY: Reader’s Digest.Google Scholar
Simeoni, Daniel. 1998. “The pivotal status of the translator’s habitus.” Target 10(1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, Zhongwei. 2012. “ The Art of War in retranslating Sun Tzu: Using cultural capital to outmatch the competition.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 7(2): 176–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tekgül, Duygu. 2017. “Competition and co-operation for recognition and professional esteem in the literary translation industry.” Translation Studies 10(1): 54–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toury, Gideon. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. 2004. “Retranslation: The creation of value.” Bucknell Review 47(1): 25–38.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Translation, publishing, and world literature: J.V. Foix’s daybook 1918 and the strangeness of minority.” Translation Review 95(1): 8–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, David Der-wei. 1992. Fictional Realism in Twentieth-Century China: Mao Dun, Lao She, Shen Congwen. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Michaela and Alexandra Fukari (eds). 2007. Constructing a Sociology of Translation. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Michaela. 2010. “Translation ‘going social’? Challenges to the (Ivory) Tower of Babel.” MonTI 21: 29–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Mapping the field: Sociological perspectives on translation.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2071: 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Minhui. 2012. “On scholar translators in literary translation: A case study of Kinkley’s translation of ‘Biancheng.’” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 20(2): 151–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. English Translations of Shen Congwen’s Stories: A Narrative Perspective. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Minhui and Chi Yu Chu. 2015. “Translators’ professional habitus and the adjacent discipline: The case of Edgar Snow.” Target 27(2): 173–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Gladys (trans). 1981. The Border Town and Other Stories. Beijing: Chinese Literature Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Cui, Zihan & Minhui Xu
2024. From Bildungsroman to historical fiction: the genre variation of the translation of Bronze and Sunflower. Neohelicon DOI logo
Hu, Bei
2023. Chapter 10. Flowing to the reception side. In Translation Flows [Benjamins Translation Library, 163], ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Jazini, Alireza
2021. Translation policy. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 7:3 ► pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Zheng, Jianwei & Wenjun Fan
2021. Different processes for translating expressive versus informative texts? A computer-assisted study of professionals’ English–Chinese translation. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36:3 ► pp. 782 ff. DOI logo
Valdeón, Roberto A. & Youbin Zhao
2020. Literary translation research in China. Perspectives 28:5 ► pp. 645 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.