Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation and Interpreting Studies
Vol. 18:1 (2023) ► pp.139–158

First encounters

The earliest approaches to translating and interpreting the Chinese language in the early modern period

ORCID logo | Lingnan University
This article examines the earliest extant translations from Chinese in the period of the first systematic encounters between Chinese and Europeans in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. It argues that agents of the Spanish and Portuguese empires in the context of early modern colonialism devised practical and effective social and linguistic approaches for translating Chinese. The article investigates three such approaches: the use of Chinese interpreters who learned European languages; the use of oral translation in the collaboration between Chinese and European interpreters; and the use of Europeans fluent in Chinese translating themselves.
Keywords: history of translation, cultural history of translation, Chinese translation, China and the West, social history of translation
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Captive translation
  • The collaborative model
  • Total immersion
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 May 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.20052.mor
References (51)
References
Barros, João de. 1563. Terceira decada da Asia de Ioam de Barros: dos feytos que os Portugueses fizeram no descobrimento & conquista dos mares & terras do Oriente. Lisbon: Ioam de Barreira.Google Scholar
Boxer, Charles Ralph. 1953. South China in the Sixteenth Century: Being the Narratives of Galeote Pereira, Fr. Gaspar Da Cruz, O.P. [and] Fr. Martín de Rada, O.E.S.A. (1550–1575). London: Printed for the Hakluyt Society.Google Scholar
Brockey, Liam Matthew. 2012. “The first China hands: The forgotten Iberian origins of sinology.” In Western Visions of the Far East in a Transpacific Age, 1522–1657, ed. by Christina H. Lee, 83–98. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
“Capitulo Di Una Lettera Del H.P. Caludio Acquav. Delli Febraro 1582.” 1582. ARSI, Jap. Sin. 9–2, 81 1. Archivum Romanun Societatis Iesu.Google Scholar
“Carta de Guido de Lavezaris Sobre Camarines, Paracale, Etc.” 1574. FILIPINAS,6,R.2,N.21. Archivo de Indias, Sevilla, Spain.Google Scholar
“Carta Del P. Agustín de Alburquerque Comunicando El Suceso Del Corsario Limahón, Que Había Ido Contra La Isla de Luzón Con 70 Navíos.” 1575. Patronato 24, r. 30. Archivo de Indias, Sevilla, Spain.Google Scholar
Chan, Albert. 1993. “Michele Ruggieri, S.J. (1543–1607) and His Chinese Poems.” Monumenta Serica 41(1): 129–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Tak-hung. 2003. One into Many: Translation and the Dissemination of Classical Chinese Literature. New York: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Martha, and Robert Neather, eds. 2016. An Anthology of Chinese Discourse on Translation: (From the Late Twelfth Century to 1800). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Martha, and Lin Wusun. 2014. An Anthology of Chinese Discourse on Translation. Volume One, From Earliest Times to the Buddhist Project. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elia, Pasquale M. D. 1942. Fonti Ricciane. Libreria dello Stato.Google Scholar
Ferrero, M. 2019. Il primo Confucio latino. Il grande studio. La dottrina del giusto mezzo. I dialoghi. LAS.Google Scholar
Findlen, Paula, ed. 2004. Athanasius Kircher: The Last Man Who Knew Everything. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folch Fornesa, Dolors. 2008. “Biografía de Fray Martín de Rada.” Huarte de San Juan. Geografía e historia 151: 33–63.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Walter. 1946. The “Mongol Atlas” of China. Beijing: Fu Jen University Press.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos. 1986. Theology and the Scientific Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Sixteenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gan, Gong. 1555. “Gu Jin Xing Sheng Zhi Tu [The Historical and Topographical Map of China].” Jinsha Shuyuan.Google Scholar
Gibson, Hannah. 2016. “Klaus Zimmerman & Birte Kellemeier-Rehbein (Eds.), Colonialism and Missionary Linguistics (Colonial and Postcolonial Linguistics 5). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2015. Pp. x + 266.” Journal of Linguistics 52(1): 236–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil, Juan. 2012. “Chinos in Sixteenth-Century Spain.” In Western Visions of the Far East in a Transpacific Age, 1522–1657, ed. by Christina H. Lee and Ann Rosalind Jones, 139–153. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
“Goana.” 1596. ARSI, Jap.-Sin. 13–1., f.46r. Archivum Romanun Societatis Iesu.Google Scholar
Harley, J. B. 1988. “Silences and secrecy: The hidden agenda of cartography in early modern Europe.” Imago Mundi 401: 57–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huigen, Siegfried, Jan L. de Jong, and Elmer Kolfin, eds. 2010. The Dutch Trading Companies as Knowledge Networks. Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hung, Eva, and Judy Wakabayashi, eds. 2005. Asian Translation Traditions. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Kamen, Henry. 2002. Spain’s Road to Empire: The Making of a World Power, 1492–1763. Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Kwan, Uganda Sze-pui, and Lawrence Wang-chi Wong, eds. 2014. Translation and Global Asia: Relocating Networks of Cultural Production. Vol. 1. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
“Legazpi al Virrey Marqués de Falces. Manila, 7 de Julio de 1569.” 1569. Filipinas, 6. Archivo de Indias, Sevilla, Spain.Google Scholar
Li, Xian. 1461. Da Ming yi tong zhi [Unified gazetteer of the Ming]. China: Nei fu. [URL]
Li, Yuzhong, and José Luis Caño Ortigosa, eds. 2017. Studies on the Map Ku Chin Hsing Sheng Chih Tu. Chu ban. Hsinchu: Research center for humanities and social sciences, National Tsing Hua University.Google Scholar
Liu, Yingsheng and Xiaochun Yang. 2011. “Da Ming hun yi tu” yu “Hun yi jiang li tu” yan jiu [Research on the maps Da Ming hun yi tu and Hun yi jiang li tu]. Nanjing: Feng huang chu ban she.Google Scholar
Liu, Yu. 2011. “The true pioneer of the Jesuit China mission: Michele Ruggieri.” History of Religions 50(4): 362–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luca, Dinu. 2016. The Chinese Language in European Texts: The Early Period. New York: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massini, Federico. 2005. “Chinese dictionaries prepared by Western missionaries in the seventeen and eighteen centuries.” In Encounters and Dialogues: Changing Perspectives on Chinese-Western Exchanges from the Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries, ed. by Xiaoxin Wu, 179–193. San Francisco: Monumenta Serica InstituteGoogle Scholar
Mungello, D. E. 1989. Curious Land: Jesuit Accommodation and the Origins of Sinology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Porter, David. 2001. Ideographia: The Chinese Cipher in Early Modern Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony. 1998. Method in Translation History. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Rada, Martín de. 1576. “Relacíon Verdadera de Las Cosas Del Reyno de Taibin, Por Otro Nombre China.” Fonds Espagnol, 325.9 (MF 13184). National Library of France, Paris.Google Scholar
Ramusio, Giovanni Battista. 1563. Primo volume, & terza editione delle navigationi et viaggi in molti lvoghi corretta, et ampliata, nella qvale si contengono la descrittione dell’Africa, & del paese del Prete Ianni, con varij viaggi etc. Venice: Givnti.Google Scholar
“Relación de Su Contenido Realizada a Través de Intérpretes Chinos y de Un Fraile Agustino.” 1574. FILIPINAS,6,R.2,N.21 5–6. Archivo de Indias, Sevilla, Spain.Google Scholar
“Relación de Una Pintura Ympresa de Molde Que Truxeron Los Chinos Este Ano de 1576.” 1576. Paris, France (Fonds Espagnol, 325, 8–9). National Library of France, Paris.Google Scholar
Ricci, Matteo. 1911. Opere storiche del P. Matteo Ricci, S. I. Macerata: Premiato.Google Scholar
Ruggieri, Michele. 2013. “Atlas da China de Michele Ruggieri.” Macao S.A.R. Cultural Affairs Bureau.Google Scholar
Sanson, Nicolas, and Jean Pruthenus Somer. 1656. “La Chine royaume.” Paris: Pierre Mariette. [URL]
Schreyer, Rüdiger. 1992. The European Discovery of Chinese (1550–1615) or the Mystery of Chinese Unveiled. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek VU.Google Scholar
Szczesniak, Boleslaw. 1952. “The origin of the Chinese language according to Athanasius Kircher’s theory.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 72(1): 21–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, Kaijian. 2012. “Ming Longwan Zhi Ji Yuedong Ju Dao Linfeng Shiji Xiang Kao: Yi Liu Yaohui ‘Dufu Shuyi’ Zhong Linfeng Shiliao Wei Zhongxin [An Investigation of the Activities of the Pirate Linfeng from the Materials of Collected in ‘Dufu Shuyi’ by Liu Yaohui].” Lishi Yanjiu [Historical Research] 61: 43–65.Google Scholar
Valdeón, Roberto A. 2014. Translation and the Spanish Empire in the Americas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Versteegh, Kees. 2018. “Language of empire, language of power.” Language Ecology 2(1–2): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Qian Jin. 2013. “Luo Mingjian Bianhui ‘Zhongguo ditu ji’ suoyiju zhongwen yuanshiziliao xintan [A new discussion of the original sources of Ruggieri’s Atlas of China].” Beijing Xingzheng Xueyuan xuebao 31: 120–28.Google Scholar
Wong, Lawrence Wang-chi, and Bernhard Fuehrer, eds. 2016. Sinologists as Translators in the Seventeenth to Nineteenth Centuries. Vol. 2. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Zhengtai. 1994. Ming Dai Yi Zhan Kao [Study of the Government Staging-Posts Network in the Ming Dynasty]. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe.Google Scholar